Welcome!
|
Hello, I'm
Nairspecht. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Banjo (2016 film), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Nairspecht
(talk)
(work) 08:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, re: this edit, please don't remove the {{ Estimation}} template from Indian film article grosses. As the very obvious note indicated, this is there by consensus per a discussion held at WT:ICTF. Check the archives if you're interested in the rationale. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Shivaay. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Diffs: [1] There is an obvious discrepancy in the financial figures as reported by the various sources. Changing the values to fit your worldview is disruptive. There is an open discussion on the article's talk page. You are urged to discuss, but please do not change the values again, as it will be considered disruptive. Also, please stop removing {{ estimation}} templates. These are present as the result of consensus at WT:ICTF. Check the discussion archives if you are curious. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, re: this edit, per Indian cinema task force consensus, we no longer use {{ INRConvert}} in the Infobox, as it 1) arbitrarily converts rupees to US dollars. 2) Creates problems with inflation, for instance when 2009 rupees are converted to 2016 US dollars, and 3) creates a jumbled mess of information in the infobox when people attempt to use the inflation features of the template. Please see this discussion if you're interested in the rationale behind the decision. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Koimoi is not considered a sufficient reference. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources
Hi there, re: this, Koimoi is not considered a reliable source per WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. It would be appreciated if you'd please familiarise yourself with this list to get a sense of what is and isn't considered sufficient sourcing. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 13:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, re: this, as previously explained, the {{ Estimation}} template belongs in the gross parameter of Indian film infoboxes per consensus at WT:ICTF. You are welcome to research the discussion archives, but please don't remove the template. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Boparae97. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Are you sure about box office74crore I THINK IT'S JUST 43,...CRORE Salma.mastani ( talk) 23:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you made this edit in the 102 Not Out article. According to the tweet, Rs. 34 crore is the cost of production + P&A. Template:Infobox film says the budget should be only the cost of production. So, is that allowed, adding promotional figures in the infobox? Thanks Vivek Ray ( talk) 04:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey there! Thank you for this edit of yours but Koimoi is not considered reliable. See WP:ICTFFAQ and Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Guidelines on sources for more about it. You can change the figure back to 35cr with proper, reliable citation. Thanks again! Vivek Ray ( talk) 14:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Also, if you want to discuss/challenge the reliability of Koimoi you can start a discussion over here. Thanks Vivek Ray ( talk) 14:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
You have added it again. Please don't add Koimoi as a source when a more reliable source is already there. If you can find any other reliable source claiming the budget to be 30 crore, feel free to change it! Thanks Vivek Ray ( talk) 06:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Boparae97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please see the budget parameter in Template:Infobox film: "This is the cost of the actual filming, and does not include marketing/promotional costs (e.g. advertisements, commercials, posters)." Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 07:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |