Hi there - I am curious why you reverted a bit from the Charles Jackson disambiguation page. I read the policy on red links, but the author I posted there was not red linked. The text was black. If a Wikipedia article is required for an entry, then we need to delete three additional entries on that page. I could have made the entry more concise admittedly. Regards Npd2983 ( talk) 16:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
It wasn't a red link, but MOS:DABRL covers it. If you read the policy there, it explains it better than I can, but basically an article is not requires but a WP article which mentions the person, and in more than a namecheck is necessary. The other entries which don't have their own articles meet this. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 18:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Boleyn. I directed discussion of your proposed merger (Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson -> Andrew Jackson, Early life and career) to Talk:Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson using the "discussion=" parameter in the {{ mergeto}} template. I did this because there are already two long-ish comments on the creation of a 'Family of Andrew Jackson' page on that talk page, and because there is no {{ mergefrom}} template on Andrew Jackson. If you think Talk:Andrew Jackson is a more appropriate place for the discussion, please change the discussion= parameter. If you make that change, you might also want to mention it on the E.H. Jackson talk page. Cnilep ( talk) 16:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, that seems fine. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 18:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ms. Boleyn, I recently re-arranged the ab initio articles(the company, the original term and the disambig page). I just saw that you removed the flying level class in aviation from the list on the dismbig page. I just wanted to point out that the original uses were based on your post in the talk pages (as boleyn2) for ab initio, I located your source and used it as reference in the ab initio article. I read through WP:DICT and I understand that wikipedia is not a dictionary but that post related to a possible usage of the term not its meaning, its meaning remains the same, only the context differs. Regardless I think someone should add the usage to wikitonary but the meaning would be more or less the same, ab initio means from the beginning in avaition just like in literature or education levels, I can cite the source if that would help. Ideally, the disambiguation page should mention all the uses in all related context especially if they are backed by a source. I have been working on fixing disambiguation links recently, there are a lot of aviation related articles that point to the main ab initio page, a mention of aviation on the disambig page as well would be very helpful, maybe you can check the pages that link to the main article and see what I mean, I urge you to re-consider. Thank you -- Theo10011 ( talk) 15:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm not an expert on Wiktionary, but you may want to add it's commonly used in aviation. As for adding it, and a source to the dab, I think you're misunderstanding what a dab is (see WP:DAB and MOS:DAB); it's essentially an index of Wikipedia articles. I saw that there is now a new article at the primary page; I haven't looked at it, but there may be room to mention aviation there. Links should never go to a dab ( WP:INTDABLINK is the only exception I can think of) and so it shouldn't be linked in aviation articles. I'm afraid adding this to the disambiguation page would go completely against the guidelines and the whole point of a dab. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 18:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
When you move a page to a new location (like you did here), it would be helpful if you checked the links to that page and performed the appropriate disambiguations. I've done this for the William Brandon page already. - Nunh-huh 17:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Nunh-huh, I was interested to get a message from you as I admire your work on here. However, I don't think this was an appropriate message to send - that edit was made more than a year and a half ago when I was quite new to WP. Boleyn ( talk) 19:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
If I've reformed? You contacted me to say I made an oversight 1 year and 8 months ago - and over 80,000 edits - ago, and you think that's helpful? It's that kind of attitude that puts people off editing at all. Boleyn ( talk) 20:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Just tried to find some links to bad edits by the user you reported but I was unable to do so. Any chance you can link edits that are vandalism?-- Gnowor Talk2Me did wha? 22:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Which vandal do you mean? I reported a few yesterday. I don't know how to link edits which are vandalism, but if it's one I reported recently that it will be that all their user contributions have been vandalism. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 08:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I merged them into Sarah Hall as both had the same information. Hope that's OK. Cheers TheRetroGuy ( talk) 18:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The Kenny Roberts and Kenneth Roberts disambig page merge was reverted because the disambig hatnotes after the merger had become dead links. I monitor the Kenny Roberts (musician) article. The latest merge though fixed the problem. Steelbeard1 ( talk) 22:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi....Well I wanted you to read the article Silkski over to see if it still sounds like an advertisement. I have made a lot of changes since you added that tag. I am hoping that its sounds more neutral. If it does, would you please so kindly remove that one tag...I would try to correct the other mistakes also.... I am still collecting strong resouces. (Have not added them yet) Also I kind of need help with citing. I have not figured that one out yet. I also made contributions to Silkski's father's page... Jerome Evans but do not know how to add the citation. I put the resource in the discussion portion of the page so that maybe one of you guys could add it. I hope I did not mess any thing up...so please help. I really want both pages to be right. Thanks so much!
--L. E. Evans 09:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diamondthadimepiece ( talk • contribs)
I added a number of sources for Silkski under his discussion page regarding the input on the article. I do not know how to properly incert the sources into the article...if you would be kind enought to do it for me I would be very grateful. I would follow your lead and do the rest of the sources I add the same. Thanks :)
--L. E. Evans 12:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diamondthadimepiece ( talk • contribs)
I've added the ref to his father's page and some to Silkski's page. You've put refs in the right places, you just need to add [1] after it. The Scene references could also do with a month or date in 2003 added to them. It doesn't sound like an advert now, but doesn't sound at all like an encyclopedia either. Some of the language, in particular the introduction, is difficult to understand if you don't know his style of music, but that can easily be rectified. Notability and orphan tags are now removed - I'm sure by the end of this, it'll be a great article and a credit to yo and all your hard work. Boleyn ( talk) 15:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you have recently deleted most entries from the disamb Arthur Roberts. I can't understand the motive. The purpose of a disambiguation page is to help readers find the article they want; not to fit some abstract aesthetic canon. We cannot assume that readers who are looking for one of those people have the full name; and often the name that is cited elsewhere is second+last or first+second, rather than first+last. So it is better to include all those possibilities than to send many readers off to a wild goose chase.
Besides, discarding the useful work of other editors is not a positive contribution to Wikipedia. Those entries took a lot of work to assemble; if you thought that they didn't belong there, you should have moved them to other appropriate disamb pages — such as the still-missing Arthur Robert disamb. All the best, -- Jorge Stolfi ( talk) 03:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
According to WP:DAB, A disambiguation page is not a search index. Do not add a link that merely contains part of the page title, or a link that includes the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion. I don't know of any encyclopedias who would list people on an Arthur Roberts page if their full name was Neil Arthur Andrew Roberts, and very few people would know what someone's middle names were. If they were commonly known as Arthur Roberts, that can be put next to the entry and mentioned in the article. It isn't a case of trying to fit fit some abstract aesthetic canon, the information made the page confusing and difficult to navigate, and very unlikely to aid anyone. I didn't see that there were people with the personal name Arthur Robert (and a dab isn't the place for partial matches - adding {lookfrom} or {intitle} in the see also does that, which I think I did for the Arthur Roberts dab). Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 11:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- please note what MOS:DABRL actually says:
Red links should not be the only link in a given entry; link also to an existing article, so that a reader (as opposed to a contributing editor) will have somewhere to navigate to for additional information.
The main reason for a dab page (as opposed to an article) is to route the reader to where content really lives, so the rationale for redlinks is different than for an article. In an article, you place a redlink to encourage new articles; in a dab page they're considered clutter that distract from their main purpose. Regards, NapoliRoma ( talk) 20:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I've no idea which page you're referring to, I'm well aware of what MOS:DABRL says. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 21:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
My apologies re: my "blanking" comment. There was no edit summary, and as the previous edits were vandalism-like ("the best person who ever lived", "a legened"), I erroneously assumed your edit was a continuation. My bad. SpecMode ( talk) 23:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Boleyn, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Hello Boleyn: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Polyamorph ( talk) 22:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year 2019! |
Boleyn, thank you for all the hard work and effort you put into Wikipedia. And welcome back to NPP, you were sorely missed. God bless! Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Boleyn, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Thanks for the message, i added a reference and will move it back (Not my first article or edit ;)). Kante4 ( talk) 15:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm JC7V7DC5768. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 1968 Drexel Dragons football team, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
JC7V ( talk) 18:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm JC7V7DC5768. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 1967 Drexel Dragons football team, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
JC7V ( talk) 18:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice! As per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#School_districts (Outcomes of AFD) school districts in the US are universally notable since they are in effect local governments (like municipalities are). Of course it's better to start off with secondary sourcing right off the bat, but I can do this at a later point!
As per the label, AFAIK "refimprove" is used if a school district page links to the official website (verification that it actually exists) but does not yet link to secondary sources. WhisperToMe ( talk) 11:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
I've realised why the 17th November AWB tagging didn't work. AWB recognises stuff like external links as references e.g. Special:Diff/875416923. I'll see if I can get around it with regex for the time being but I'll probably ask the developers if there's a way of choosing the tags per citation style. Many thanks for your help on this. SITH (talk) 15:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey, it's 7 years old. You can add the Draws from the subarticles as References. Kante4 ( talk) 09:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
As previously noted: "Please do not modify the test result articles as they will be used at WP:BOTREQ to demonstrate what it does". I need the test results to remain as-is. -- Green C 22:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Please don't welcome me to Wikipedia. I have been working on Wikipedia since 2006.-- Grahame ( talk) 08:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Please see the article. Removed ads, added footnotes. Thank you very much ! Namerst ( talk) 18:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey Boleyn! Happy New Year! Angela Maureen ( talk) 19:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm UnitedStatesian. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Amirul Shafik Che Soh, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
UnitedStatesian ( talk) 00:54, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've been working on the Maude Gillette Phillips article for 12 minutes and promise I'll get to adding more categories within the first hour. Thanks for your patience. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Toli Chiefdom, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Onel5969 TT me 22:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Re 1862 City of Dunedin by-elections it is now finished (but still a stub) as have worked out that there was no March poll for Dick & Richardson: Called for after a show of hands on Tuesday 18 March (ODT 18 March, OW 22 March) but then scrubbed Wednesday 19 March as Richardson’s nominator was not on the local roll. And Dick had resigned as he did not want to go to the session in Auckland. NB: the OW 22 March article did not have what happened on the 19th when the poll was scrubbed (a local paper but not up to date!). By combining two or three by-elections in one year into one article, it simplifies checking by-election templates (two separate types of template) and articles which can have a redirect to the one article if necessary. Some distinguished the two in one year with “April 1862” and ”July 1862” in the title, some has (1st) and(2nd), but they can all be given a redirect to the one article. And there are sometimes both “City of Dunedin by-election” and “Dunedin by-election”. NB: never thought of removing the last part (after ?) from Papers Past URLs. Hugo999 ( talk) 10:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Is there a way to move Draft:2019 in the United States into the main space, replacing the less completed 2019 in the United States article? GoodDay ( talk) 07:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I want to make some updates to the Microland page on wiki. How do I go about this? I have the new content ready. Can I send it to you for review? And if yes, how? Regards UshaMicroland ( talk) 05:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
I've been here awhile. I'm not going to debate notability anymore. I just wanted that junk off Quiller without (necessarily) losing it entirely. If it gets deleted, so be it. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 08:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Boleyn, thanks for your email, the article will shortly gain references as soon as the first competition is finished. If you look at the 2018 edition you will see that the article was updated every week throughout the year. The same is planned for this year. Many thanks Racingmanager ( talk) 16:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello Boleyn, is there a way to disable your Wikipedia tool thingy so it doesn't write on my talk page? I've created over 500 articles, so it's kinda silly that they my new articles are getting reviewed, it didn't use to be like that before. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 22:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Sharaf al-Din Harun Juvayni is only three lines long (as it appears on my computer, but has several pieces of information within it and several sources used, but it isn't clear at the moment where each bit comes from, so readers can't easily check information. Again, there are worse flaws in an article, but its right that it's tagged as a needed improvement. I also tagged it as a stub. There are no huge issues with the articles I've seen created by you, I've enjoyed reading them. Boleyn ( talk) 20:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Molly White (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. wumbolo ^^^ 20:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:16th-century academics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 21:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for the review! |
Many thanks for your due diligence on Saint John Newland. I'm brushing up my Wikipedia skills, and this was my first shot. I mostly fix typos and make other minor page edits. I want to highlight some of the history from my home town and link everything together. It was the 2017 European City of Culture. Who knows? Someone may be interested!!! sugarfish ( talk) 00:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC) |
Greetings, you are invited to join Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Clash of Civilizations in Wikipedia. To join the association, add your name to the list here. To indicate your membership of the association, you may care to add the following template on your userpage |
| ||||||
|
-- PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 14:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chloe Jones (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Jones (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 23:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Have completed all 19c by-elections with 1878 Waipa by-election Hugo999 ( talk) 10:55, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
You just left a tag on NCAA Division I Indoor Track and Field Championships – Men's 60 meter dash complaining about inline citations. You did not detail your complaint on talk. Normally I regard such incomplete messages as vandalism, see my talk page, but since this is so recent, lets try to address this AGF. This is a list article. The sources of the list, two of them, are listed at the bottom. All of the information of this article comes from those two sources. All of the disambiguation is done through my knowledge of these individuals and is backed by the contents of their individual articles. What other inline citations are possible? Just what do you expect? Do you understand the subject you are commenting on? Trackinfo ( talk) 20:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Britishfinance. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Bernardo de Iriarte, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Britishfinance ( talk) 01:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Boleyn,
Yes, I already know you, nice to meet you! The article was only redirected by me, for the continuation you must talk with Herodotptlomeu. Christina
Catherine Pole is not a major player but in the context of the genealogical situation in the Tudor period, she has importance. I have never seen a circular link before. If you are going to do that, you ma as well give her her own article. Trahelliven ( talk) 05:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Boleyn. I had the idea to start the Tribunal de Paris article when it was the "Featured Tall Building" on SkyscraperCenter.com for December 2018. Also, the French Wikipedia has an article on the Tribunal de Paris, and so does the German Wikipedia. Jim856796 ( talk) 03:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Could you provide a reason why you unreviewed Dylan Connolly? I'm guessing you regard it as unsourced, however there are three external links which clearly reference everything in the article. Kosack ( talk) 15:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
I was unaware that I was going to be notified when I didn't communicate for a lengthy period of time. As with most Wikipedia users my goal is to fix mistakes and add missing information on pages. Thanks!
I know that the article Max Leo Keller is under-cited, however I don't have any more citations. It was a direct(ish) translation from the German wiki. I copied over the one citation from that article, and checked today to see if there more more. Unfortunately, that's all I have. Mailman9 (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Please tell me how can I convert Draft into a page. I have created this draft. You can see. Bilal190023 ( talk) 05:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Cheers! I made an update to the Diego Hernández page but I wanted you to look at it, just in case. The disamb... page was for people's names but now it also includes a place. Are the templates correct? Thanks! -- the eloquent peasant ( talk) 13:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Boleyn, I saw the Wikipedia:BLPPROD tags on the Ghanaian parliamentarians articles I created but didn't get time to deal with them yet. The reference section completely escaped me when I was creating them. Thanks for getting to them earlier than me to fix them. Regards -Masssly ( talk) 10:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
user User:Frank marine is edit the page due to translate from thai article with no english grammar knowledge. I tired to help him prove the article why Wikipeida doen't has a countermeasure to stop this guy edit any page in Wikipedia. Every article that he edit is non-sense and all translate from Thai language from Google Translate with no re-check. I need your help to block him and please check every article that he make which is bullshit article and bullshit action. Thank You 58.8.169.80 ( talk) 07:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Boylyn, I was wondering if you could spare some time to help me with my draft? I got a bizarre message from another person on my page which I see you answered- I looked you up- and wow- you are the ULTIMATE wiki editor. I have worked hard on the new draft- any help, when you have time would be appreciated. /info/en/?search=Draft:Laura_Liguori I got some help from the teahouse which was great and appreciated!
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilviaTRE388 ( talk • contribs) 06:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
I really appreciate the help! Thank you for your time! Any changes please make! I totally trust your decisions and will learn from what you do for my next update! I am learning as I go this is my second article and I have much to learn still! Thank you for your work and for making wiki what is today!
An even more bizarre tag is the fact that you felt a need to leave a reply on User talk:SilviaTRE388 about something I was speaking to a Wikipedia member about. This post is in response to a message you left on their talk page. I was merely expressing to them how I felt about this ongoing experience with draftspace with someone else. I assumed it might be the same feelings for them. Why would you criticize ("Quite a bizarre tag, PeaceShield5" and "passive aggressive and irrelevant...") or comment on something I said to someone else other than you? Also, you didn't leave the message on my talk page. That make it feels like a roundabout and indirect way of critiquing someone without actually confronting them about something, maybe it could even be considered by some as "passive aggressive and irrelevant". Also, other than expressing myself, I stated facts about my experience. I have read some of the comments and messages on your talk page, and whether you accept it or not, Wikipedia members have had problems with some of your actions. Also, thanks for moving the Draft:The Black Dahlia (graphic novel) to draftspace before I even had time to work on it. It has not been a pleasant experience. I'm fighting for a book to have an article. You may not find it "noteworthy," but it is. So thanks. PeaceShield5 ( talk) 03:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
It wasn't deliberate. At least I didn't see it that way. Nor was it intentional. Again, I did not see it in that way. If it came across that way, Boleyn, I honestly apologize. It wasn't nice, polite, or the right thing to do, no matter how I describe or phrase it. Again, truthfully, I just want to say I'm sorry. PeaceShield5 ( talk) 08:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Boleyn, I'll try to find some more references in English to back my translation of the Russian article on the Ural Army. This is not easy, but i do believe that the Russian article is based on sufficient references in Russian. In general, i'm convinced that the knowledge in the Western World about this important period in the history of Russia, should be increased. And i hope translating articles on the English Wikipedia can help, IF the articles are correct of course. Regards, Filiep ( talk) 11:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Can you help me with adding beatport references to each row of tracks that I did? If there is a remix that comes along with it, add the link along with the other. DJAlexander408 19:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)DJAlexander408DJAlexander408 19:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Well after a while I came back from a break after not logging in for months. Anyway here is one I found on the new page feed, Jerry Miller (I found one earlier today that had about 4 or 5 names come up, but I can't remember what the name was) Wgolf ( talk) 00:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Apologies for not responding to your message earlier, I have had limited time on here recently. The external links added on the articles are enough to serve as citations for the mentioned articles, I just wanted to find something stronger than that. Unfortunately I was not able to, so will use them as citations, and should have it done within the day. Kaiser matias ( talk) 20:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Is there any way to get like a list of articles I have created that have been tagged so that I can work on improving them? Like is there a way to search for that info somewhere or would an admin possibly know? Adamtt9 ( talk) 19:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Horsemonden-Turner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whig ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
The article John Mulroy (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Footballer who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
BlameRuiner (
talk) 15:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)