This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
I have reverted your edit, for which you gave no explanation or the required summary. Please see my comment on the talk page. Tom Reedy ( talk) 12:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Bertaud,
Just wanted to drop you a note to let you know I've done the re-assessment of
1H6,
2H6,
3H6 that you requested an age or so ago. Apologies for letting it sit so long, but as you've probably inferred by now the
Shakespeare WikiProject is a bit unfocussed and lacking in manpower (which makes your wonderful contributions all the more appreciated!). As I noted in the edit summary, I think the three Henry's, as well as
The Taming of the Shrew and
The Two Gentlemen of Verona, are pretty darn near to [[WP:GA|Good Article]] quality. Almost all of these articles are mostly too long (a rare problem here), so a lot of the work in progressing them would be in paring them down, figuring out what to cut, what to express more succinctly, and what would benefit from being spun out into a {{
main article}} using
summary style.
If you are still interested in working on them (and I would quite understand if you didn't, given the lack of response and contributions from the rest of us), I would suggest picking the one you're most happy with and either requesting a
peer review of it or just nominating it as a
Good Article candidate (be prepared for a delay, there are backlogs in both processes). Both processes are designed to help improve an article by reviews from uninvolved editors. I'd be happy to provide what little help or advice I can, but I'm terribly pressed for available WikiTime and I'm not very familiar with either of these plays.
PS. The Shakespeare project's current collaboration (still) is
The Tempest, which we've recently nominated for GA; and I'm sure everyone would appreciate your involvement on that article as well. There are some remaining tasks on the Talk page, and every article is usually in need of more copy-editing for better prose quality.
Anyways, just a quick note to let you know. --
Xover (
talk) 13:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. You were mentioned here [ [3]]. I hope you can take part. Best Regards, Smatprt ( talk) 23:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Dear user,
This is a quick message to inform you that I have taken the Shakespeare authorship question request for mediation. I will be spending a day or so trying to get an understanding of the dispute and create a framework to take the discussion forward.
Please understand that mediation is not a quick process and that a fair amount of patience is required. If any of you have any question feel free to contact me by email through the wiki interface.
Many Thanks
Your Mediator - Seddon talk| WikimediaUK 01:17, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Shakespeare_authorship_question. I have archived the rest of the page and this page will be the main page for this mediation Seddon talk| WikimediaUK 11:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |