From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

A tag has been placed on Crimson Interactive Pvt. Ltd., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:


I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk 17:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC) reply

License tagging for Image:InfocusRenucover book.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:InfocusRenucover book.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Diary_of_a_Housewife_Poorva_Naresh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Diary_of_a_Housewife_Poorva_Naresh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Crimson Interactive Pvt. Ltd.. Please use the {{ hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. DarkSaber2k 12:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Mehnaaz - LIFW-Gayatri2.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mehnaaz - LIFW-Gayatri2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shinerunner ( talk) 22:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Yu3438.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Yu3438.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 ( talk) 05:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Laila - A Mystery, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rediff.com/movies/2005/apr/01laila.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 07:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Bhookailas.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bhookailas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 ( talk) 20:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Picture karwar 720.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Picture karwar 720.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 05:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Proposed deletion of Laila - A Mystery

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Laila - A Mystery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no sources, no content

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Adrian 1001 ( talk) 17:00, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Athiran! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 939 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Vinod Sukumaran - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 23:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Rajiv Anchal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajiv Anchal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Anchal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Noopur28 ( talk) 19:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Non-free rationale for File:Poorva Naresh.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Poorva Naresh.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC) reply