Im me my friend would like to speak to you.
Hi Atelaes, nice work on those ancient Greek wiktionary articles. Thanks for that, Colin MacLaurin ( talk) 01:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Done. MAG1 ( talk) 08:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
That's annoying I'm taking a look. If I can't fix it, I'll revert. - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 21:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, Atelaes. Somehow, I felt that blocking me was wrong, anyway, and someone may need to talk to Connel, the admin responsible for blocking me on wiktionary, I forgot his last name, but he still needs to be talked to. I mean, by blocking me there, he was just biting a newcomer. Kitty53 ( talk) 21:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey! Im back and very anxious to work with you im also eager to get my newly found desire for linguistic knolege fulfilled which i can see you can be a powerfull aid! I would like some feedback and some info on whats going on that you think id be interested in. so hit me up! Randy6767 ( talk) 22:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. I have corrected my error. Happy editing, Kukini háblame aquí 13:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
You must be right about the fonts. Sorry, but I couldn't tell - also, you don't seem to have been logged in, right? So I saw an IP address doing something I couldn't understand, and made a false assumption. Thanks for the explanation. By the way, I might not have done it if there had been an edit summary. dougweller ( talk) 07:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your contribution on A-Cai's talk page!! As I'm getting physically tired right now [it's past three in the morning here], I hope to be able to reply to your nice, constructive and broad-minded post over the weekend. Most appreciated and a sincere Thank You for now!-- 219.69.81.128 ( talk) 20:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
PS, I wasn't too happy with the adjectives nice and broad-minded yesterday. I shouldn't have been anal perhaps about my "three adjectives rule", and instead have gone by just constructive, which is for sure pertaining and suitable in describing your commentary!-- 219.69.81.128 ( talk) 09:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay, the ""rile up" entry is already deleted by semperblotto, which I found out when I was trying to go back to copy and paste the source I gave in, just in case. There doesn't seem to have been left any comments on the discussion page. I don't seem to have gotten any remark as to why deleted on my IP address I have for now. I didn't readily see how to access the deletion log. Can you imagine that this is slightly off putting? I mean as far as I know it's a kosher English word. I had rather a long and hard look yesterday at entries formatting English verbs. My shorthand I don't think is an excuse now for misunderstandings. I try to be constructive here as you were in above mentioned post. In this follow-up message, having had a look at the "personal attack" Guidelines/policy page, I am rather carefully wording the previous as well as the following, which is that I really don't understand that the deletor's guiding principles and find actions like this one for instance, with no communication ensuing a tad upsetting, which is an actual understatement. [And I am sure, having had a read about what newcomers feel about first time out- of-the-blue deletions and blocks, I am certainly not the only one who perceives this in such way, which in the end cannot be good for the dictionary project]. I'm looking forward to your feedback Sven 70-- 219.69.81.128 ( talk) 09:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
So the only thing missing was {{en-verb}} below the level two header, which would have put the content box in place? Why delete an entry for that, especially without comment?-- 219.69.81.128 ( talk) 11:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)