From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ancemy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Little Red Riding Hood talk 23:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Please read WP:RS. You haven't yet provided a source which discusses Grey Legacy's notability. Little Red Riding Hood talk 23:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm having difficulty getting a source other than the foundation itself that confirms the comic won it (likely due to the age of the award). I may have to let someone more research savvy than I uncover it. In the meantime, the notability of the comic itself meets WP:WEB's second condition about major award, so it should survive an AfD until the article can be improved. Ancemy ( talk) 19:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Note that I haven't listed it for deletion, it does sort of meet notability requirements, just better sourcing.  :) Little Red Riding Hood talk 22:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Oh, okay. Thanks. I've heard the stories about how harsh Wiki can be to webcomic pages, so I was worried. Since Wayne is in Pittsburgh, I'm hoping the local papers there might have something about his win. They don't seem to have their 1992 archives online, though. Someone will need to get their hands on the physical archives. Ancemy ( talk) 22:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Your webcomic

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics/Webcomics_work_group#Web_Cartoonists.27_Choice_Awards_-_does_this_confer_notability - I put a PROD on your page. If you remove the PROD, I will start an AFD discussion. WhisperToMe ( talk) 02:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC) reply

SGVY

I made some changes to the actual SGVY article, if you want to take a look. Thanks for starting it! -- Darkmanfan ( talk) 05:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC) reply

  • Thanks for the help. I'll start back into it once the AfD is resolved. Ancemy ( talk) 00:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

OO Article

I noticed you've been working on the Okashina Okashi article. To save yourself a lot of work, you can just revert back to this version: [1]. It has character and plot summaries, plus an important section on references in other websites. Thanks for the help! Buspar ( talk) 10:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Your version is a lot better than mine. Thank you for pointing that out! Ancemy ( talk) 21:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi Ancemy, Sorry I was unaware of what you were doing with the Hugh Atkin article :) Marek.69 talk 03:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply

  • Phew, thanks. It scared me when you used the "last warning" message. Ancemy ( talk) 03:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
(Messages withdrawn) - You should have mentioned it earlier. Happy editing :) Marek.69 talk 03:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
I posted here. I should have posted to your talk page, instead. I'll do that in the future. Ancemy ( talk) 03:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your bold edits in good faith redirecting this article. I agree with you that that will be the likely outcome of the deletion debate. However, you should not do this until the deletion debate has ended with the outcome of redirecting. If you feel that it is completely uncontroversial, you can go ahead and close the debate yourself through the non-admin closure process. I'm not completely convinced that it is uncontroversial, but almost, so I'm not doing it myself. Just letting you know that I've reverted your redirect, and that I totally consider your redirect to be done in good faith. Cheers! - Lilac Soul ( talk contribs Soul}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en count)I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here! 08:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Third Opinion on Okashina Okashi

Sorry, my mistake. People forgetting to remove the articles from the list is not uncommon, so I was just trying to clean up. Regards, ƒingersonRoids 23:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC) reply

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Okashina Okashi - Strange Candy. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okashina Okashi - Strange Candy (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply

[[David Willis (cartoonist) 2nd AFD

David Willis (cartoonist) is up at AFD again, since you participated in the last discussion I thought I'd drop you a line. IncinerateAfterThoroughExamination ( talk) 13:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply