![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
Hey, thanks for the links. I plan to get my references in good order today. Much appreciated. Lvdflorence ( talk) 16:51, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Alan. Thanks for taking an interest in my article 1949 MacRobertson Miller Aviation DC-3 crash. (On 11 November you added 30em to the Reflist template - your diff.) I have made the same adjustment to the Reflist of a new article I am working up in my sandbox.
I have done some searching to find the function of 30em but without much success. Can you explain its purpose? Many thanks. Dolphin ( t) 03:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Although you say the names of the various units are not proper nouns, they are in fact names. It's like Ministry of Defence is capitalised. FunkyCanute ( talk) 19:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Evening Ahunt: You may well be right: I don't know these engines well but I was surprised when it redlinked. It is, though, what Janes's says. I've had a quick look for web sites that give the engine type and have only found this one, which also says IO-320. Mind, they might have got it from JAWA. Might be hard to tie it down. I guess WP policy would say follow the source, even if you are sure it's wrong! I'll poke around a bit more. TSRL ( talk) 20:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Morning Ahunt. Do you know if images on Flikr Commons like this one] are OK for uploading to to WP? Looks so at first sight, but I wondered if there had been a discusion somewhere that I'd missed. I was really looking for Crown Copyright stuff but have not found those yet. TSRL ( talk) 10:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
May I ask, why so much hatred towards a notable embedded development tool ( Flash memory emulator) ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anceurs ( talk • contribs)
Hello! I would appreciate Your input in Talk:Epiphany (web browser)/GA1. I'm working on it, but help is needed. The biggest problem for me is MOS:ENGVAR compliance, so Your help here is mission-critical. — —
Hi Ahunt, I noticed you deleted "Cloth-wing ultralight aircraft" and indeed I figured that there would be some objection to this category, however I still believe the categorisation (although not recognized by any authority) is still sound and hence I was wondering whether you could place the deleted article on my userspace (/KVDP) so that I can post the article somewhere else (ie Appropedia), and if it becomes good enough (referenced, ...) I can then perhaps repost it. KVDP ( talk) 13:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
We have had our differences in the past, and who knows what tomorrow will bring... But on the subject of requiring references for the numerous applications of the Rotax 912, I am all with you - you will remember I am not convinced of the relevance of mentioning these applications at all, far worse would be having to reference them! Kindly, Jan olieslagers ( talk) 22:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
for you at User talk:TSRL TSRL ( talk) 16:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Hello Ahunt/Archive11. Given your interest in
Flight simulation related articles, you are invited to participate in
WikiProject Flight Simulation, a project dedicated on improving Wikipedia's coverage of flight simulation related articles. |
I noticed your many contributions to Flight simulator and thought you might be interested, Oddbodz ( talk) 19:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Without Your priceless contribution the Epiphany article would never make it to WP:GA. Thank You! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk) 08:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC) |
Hello Ahunt, I'd like you to leave a comment at [1]. We have two separate articles for V Australia (now Virgin Australia International) and Virgin Australia. Their website states that the V Australia 777-300ER is now operating for Virgin Australia. Would you help shed some light on this? Thanks, → εϻαd ιν ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης 11:28, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Great pictures! I know I had some old ones I had to scan in, but these are much better. I wasn't sure if I should have merged all the SA series, considering the wide range of configurations, but the aircraft seems to have a common core. This aircraft deserves much more content, as do a lot of the early homebuilt's. I'll add more as I find material that can be cited. Thanks for all the cleanup on my stub articles, It's good to have a second set of eyes check the new stuff. FlugKerl ( talk) 23:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
Thank you for saying hello, it makes me feel more welcome. SeeTheInvisible ( talk) 20:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited List of aircraft engines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AFR and Aiello ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 02:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC).
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
you know that edit of mine that you reverted on the cessna 182 article, no sweat, i totally get why you did it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace10000 ( talk • contribs)
![]() | On 31 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Partenair Mystere, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Partenair Mystere, a homebuilt aircraft, had an estimated building time of 1000 hours? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Partenair Mystere.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 21:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Hovey Whing Ding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urethane ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cosmos ULM, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://cosmos.fr/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 15:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt ! see the link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Multirole_combat_aircraft#Promotion_of_Rafale.2C_you_say_.3F
I really don't understand, I can't see
NPOV in the page, please answer on the Multirole talk page.
AirCraft (
talk) 00:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ChiXlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 06:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I had tried to create the Parabola GNU/Linux reference back in October, but didn't find any reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. But if it helps, here are some of the most useful sources I was able to find through Google and Gbooks. I personally don't believe there's much there to establish the notability, but if there's something there that you're able to find, or a link within of those sites, maybe it might help. I use Arch Linux, and thing a free (as in FSF's definition) version is awesome, I just personally don't think the distro (from what I was able to find, and what is current in the article) meets Wikipedia's requirements, but if you're able to find something, that'd be great. - Sudo Ghost 16:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt....thanks for that distinction on the Commons vs Wikipedia. What I'm still not clear on is this business of an original work (i.e. my original photo) of copyrighted material. As far as the Commons goes, how far does a copyright extend? For example, what about a photo of an artwork, say, something hanging in a museum by a living artist? Barte ( talk) 19:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt,
My comment was: (This comment is not encyclopedic)
Nigel's answer does not address the comment. (Undid revision 471362470 by Stodieck (talk) - no it isn't - describes the nature of the noise of the aircraft)
Sorry but there is no COI, I actually think your editing is biased. I do not fly and I have no connect to Piaggio or any related entity. Stodieck — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stodieck ( talk • contribs) 00:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Promotional sounding language creeps in on occasion, and you are welcome to edit that out. The P180 happens to be my interest at the moment. Editing the Wiki is not. If you are editing more than say, 100 pages, I suspect that it is you who are, in effect, vandalizing those pages. Your actual knowledge in depth of that many subjects is not likely and you are actually just dumbing these pages down to your level. A person who is actually focused on a particular subject, is the person who is more likely to be an actual expert on that subject. Your editing is aggressive enough that you are altering the content, not just maintaining the form of the entries. If you are editing 1000 Wiki pages, you are an expert on Wiki from not on a subjects of content. If the Wiki does not have a limit on the number of pages a person can edit, it should establish one. -- Stodieck ( talk) 01:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
The "odd edit" was an attempt to fix a broken link to a Flying article. Instead of deleting it, I suggest you fix it. -- Stodieck ( talk) 03:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
The reference you removed from the page for the Linux Kernel on December 2nd was an easily verifiable log of calculations based on a previous reference's numbers adjusted for the present date at that time. It is my opinion that those numbers should not even need another citation beyond the original calculations from 2008 listed and a citation of the new LOC numbers for that point in time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.6.129 ( talk) 12:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice on browser selection. I agree that all browsers should have spelling correction, (with aviation terms!). It should also be a feature put into the wikipedia editing tools. Due to Configuration management, software licensing, and security choices, not all editors have access to these features at all terminals they edit from. In my case, when spell check is available, I go back through articles I have created en masse for fixes, if bot's have not already completed the task. I recognize poor spelling, and bad copyedit lessen the credibility of an article, but the articles are also living documents that will be peer reviewed and improved up to FA class. A con of Crowdsourcing content is that people with a expertise or interest in a subject willing to contribute, may not be the best at writing encylopedic style content as well. I appreciate the ability to add shared content, and the editor's who give quality to the content. FlugKerl ( talk) 03:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I made this edit to GNU General Public License, and it got me wondering where I got it in my head that Linux being the WP:COMMONNAME is a consensus, or if that was just something I incorrectly inferred from certain talk page discussions. Is this use of Linux as opposed to GNU/Linux a Wikipedia consensus that can be found somewhere, or am I just making an incorrect assumption? - Sudo Ghost 00:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey, don't you think that referring to someone as "GNU spammer" just because of two very minor good-faith edits is not right? Thanks. -- Lonwolve ( talk) 20:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the translation; with my few words of German I'd guessed it meant "wind play" or something similar and not bothered to look in the dictionary. A little knowledge ... !
BTW, an editor has repeated one of the refs in that article as an external source. Didn't feel quite right to me - what do you think? TSRL ( talk) 11:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Hu-Go Craft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dihedral ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello again!
Below is a section that I have copied from my user page. I have "cheated" a little, in that I have taken the photograph from the Wikipedia Land Rover Series article, but, apart from the fact that mine has the old-style (grey metal symbols on black metal) numberplates, and does not have those rather modern-looking overtaking mirrors on the doors, one would swear that it is an image of mine.
After making the two MGB userboxes for me earlier this month, you very kindly offered to help me again. I would be thrilled if you were to make one indicating that same message as shown on the MGB GT.
Obviously, I imagine you may wish to use a different image, should you know of a more suitable one.
Image:1963.landrover.s2a.arp.jpg
I look forward to hearing from you. With kindest regards, Gareth Griffith-Jones ( talk) 15:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Code | Result | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{ User:Ahunt/LandRover}} |
|
Usage |
I've attempted to clean up the "electric" section, but the rest of this page has a lot of errors. Some of it is a bit comical (ie "drive-belts must not be twisted", adjacent to a picture of the Schleicher drive-train that twists the belt) ! Some it it is a bit crazy, for example the bit I corrected about "electric drive for environmental reasons".
Anyway, last time I tried to clean up a page I ended up having edits removed by those with more conviction than knowledge. How do I avoid that ? I'd like to improve the material but I don't want to just waste my time...
Thanks in advance, Best Regards, Dave
I have given multiple presentations on this topic (Soaring Society of America conventions, EAA conventions, etc) as I am a recognized expert in this field. Should I put the slide decks from some of these presentations on my web site and cite that ? Unfortunately the slides don't include all the detail material. Also, you've added "citation needed" for information already available in existing citations (ie Lange web site) - should I just post a duplicate citation in these cases ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave Nadler ( talk • contribs) 20:33, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
OK, should I get one or more of SSA, ASA, or other organizations to publish the material (thus its nominally reviewed and endorsed as expert) ? Though in reality if anyone wanted to publish materials on this topic they would likely ask me to review it... For example the lecture I'm giving Thursday (Electric Gliders at SSA convention) will likely be published on SSA and/or SoaringCafe web sites ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave Nadler ( talk • contribs) 14:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey this is Uhlan, you might know me as OKelly but I have since changed my username. I'm not really a barnstar-giving-user but I would like to say thanks for your help with the UN related userboxes. So thanks! Uhlan ( talk) 20:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for the friendly e-mail, it is not my intention to spam, but can see why it looks like it - will reference without the linking. Out of interest can I recommend additions to the specifications for the jets? Leybourneboy ( talk) 18:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikiwings | |
For launching an astonishing 56 articles in January, almost half of the record 120 in the month. Tremendous! And for somehow finding time amongst all that to edit many of the other new article, continuously tidying and improving. TSRL ( talk) 11:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hello, youmight be interested in a discussion I have started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft#Flexible winged aircraft Petebutt ( talk) 05:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Sudo Ghost 02:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I was looking for something else in the article and skipped right over that :-) -- Lyncs ( talk) 20:18, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Not sure how it fits into the big scheme of things but 2004/5 Leisure Aviation says the Flugschule Wings Alfa is actually made by Europe Sails and appears to be related to the Europe Sails Alfa as they were both designed by Norbert Brodnig of Flugschule Wings! MilborneOne ( talk) 22:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Hegy Propellers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Corvair and Continental Motors ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for creating the new article Airborne Climax. Your efforts to improve Wikipedia are appreciated. Northamerica1000 (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC) |
Adam, I was just popping in to have a look at the new Bell 525 article, and I noticed that it is in the same size/weight range as the old Bell 214ST (which had only about 500 lb less MTOW), with the same basic engine type no less! Anyway, while glancing through the 214 article, I noticed this line: "The 214ST was replaced in production by the Bell 230. [1]" You added that back in 2009 per this diff, so I just wanted to check with you about it insted of deleting it outright. It seems a bit off given that the 214ST is more than double the MTOW of the 230. Any thoughts? Was this perhaps referring to their place in the production/assembly line itself, rather than the product line-up as the text implies? Thanks. BilCat ( talk) 01:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Notes: Developed originally for Iran and flown as a prototype for the first time in February 1977, the Model 214ST is a significantly improved derivative of the Model 214B BigLifter, customer deliveries having commenced early in 1982. The current production version has dual controls and standard seating for pilot, co-pilot and up to 18 passengers in three rows across the cabin plus a two-place bench seat on each side of the rotor mast. A non-retractable tubular skid-type or tricycle wheel-type undercarriage may be fitted, and a variety of special mission equipment has been developed and certified to suit the SuperTransport for service with the offshore oil industry. Military transport models have been delivered to Brunei (one), Iraq (45), Peru (11), Thailand (nine) and Venezuela (four). The Model 214ST is being replaced by the Model 230 (see page 230).
Notes: The Model 230 is a derivative of the Model 222 which it is intended to replace, production of the latter having ended with 184 built. Two of these were transferred to Bell's Canadian company in 1990 for conversion to prototypes of the Bell Model 230 and the first of these flew at Mirabel, Quebec, on 12 August 1991.
Thank you for helping on my edits on Antivirus software. I added the info just because I accidentally arrived at this page. I don't know how soon will I go back there. If you review that page systematically, you might also want to move my edits tagged as needing reference to the talk page, if no further clarification is made after a decent amount of time. I consider the information I provided to be correct, but my way of explaining it may be biased or fallacious. Also, I'm not a native English speaker. I hope that the "citation needed" tag will attract people to work on it and improve it. 79.119.11.171 ( talk) 16:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm a former programmer employee of a reputable AV company. I'm subject to a non-disclosure agreement. I'm not sure how much of the information I have, is trade secret. I can only provide some tiny, abstract notes. From my experience, the really hardcore programing is done in the AV companies. There are lots of very smart guys there. I hope some of them will join to provide the info they are legally able. I quit my job to switch to research in automated theorem proving. That's why I needed Cohen's result. All I can say, you might not imagine how useful are Wikipedia's articles about Maths and theoretical Computer Science for a researcher. Paradoxically, in the academic field, Wikipedia is not regarded as a reliable source. I told you this just to understand from what perspective I made my edits. However, I don't intend to exercise proof by authority. That's why I welcome your reviews and I hope more smart people will join and review my edits. 79.113.46.76 ( talk) 09:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
I've restarted my router. My IP has changed. Former 79.119.11.171 79.113.46.76 ( talk) 10:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your official "Welcome" message. About the bug: clear all your history and than visit www.wikipedia.org. Type in "antivirus". Do this again but type in "antivirus software". Something similar happens when I visit the page "The Maid Freed From The Gallows" through the link Gallows Pole Mv Cristi ( talk) 12:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
The edit I made about the "statistical heuristic" really needs a citation or, at least, some mathematical description. I'm not an experienced editor, but I think that it might have gained enough attention and is still not referenced. I doubt any one will find a reference, so it should be moved to the talk page. I can work on it on the talk page too and other people might not be afraid to tell their subjective opinions. The other unreferenced edits might be subject to consensus, so they may be moved to the talk page or may stay with the citation needed tag. What do you think? Mv Cristi ( talk) 14:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for referencing my small addition to the Cessna 310 article. I've always had a small difficulty with that function (referencing). Could probably contribute more if I mastered it myself. Dr. Dan ( talk) 02:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Impuls 17, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Impuls 14. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot ( talk) 20:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Lacey M-10, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slot ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I see you've reverted my change that removed the infobox. Wikipedia:AIRMOS#Infobox says "the infobox is purely optional". In this case the infobox serves no purpose and does not match similar articles e.g. Civil aviation. Is there any reason why this article should have a 1-picture infobox ? DexDor ( talk) 15:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moyes Litespeed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moyes Litespeed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Bejnar ( talk) 20:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Ahunt. I dispute your recent edit to this article. Both the template you quote and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Aircraft) state that the manufacturer name should be included in an infobox if the title otherwise contains only a model number or is ambiguous. PeterWD ( talk) 16:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I have to say it is always a pleasure to see the quality edits you make. You were right about removing <free software>. I added some licencing categories and to Chromium. Chrome is still inconsistent as it has the <Free and open source software> template. As always, depends on how strict the "Free Software" applies (cf Firefox branding). I added some thoughts Talk:Google Chrome. Widefox ( talk) 16:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Turner T-40, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page X-2 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, I posted some questions at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Andy_Dingley#Airplane_flight_controls If you could give some additional advice on this it would be appreciated. Thanks, KVDP ( talk) 14:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.182.171.25 ( talk)
Hmmm, I wanted to purvey the information for specific protest locations, at least for the next 24 hours. I thought adding all that info in text to the article or adding text stating "info can be found in this ref" was ungainly. How it is now there is no sign that the details for each protest are located in the ref. I can think of no better way than the way I had it. As wikipedia's foremost purpose is to disseminate information, and EL is getting in the way, could we not ignore WP:EL for the moment? Please revert if you agree, or change to something else if you have a better solution. Thanks, Canadian Spring ( talk) 00:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Canadian procurement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Ubuntu (operating system). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Elizium23 (
talk) 23:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. I have only now discovered the Category:Aviation articles needing images. I noticed quite a few entries where images have already been added to the articles, a few by me, but some by members of aircraft project. The category is too large for me to individually check and apply corrections. Perhaps templates should be re-checked via the same processes as originally. Heads-up - No reply expected. PeterWD ( talk) 19:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Why did you recreate talk:Epiphany (web browser)? To my knowledge we don't normally redirect talk pages of redirects. AFAIK, this practice is only followed in case of overly disputed names (after move wars, POV fork recreation, etc.). Instead we use them to discuss the merits of redirects or even for explaining the rationale behind the redirect's name and existence. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk) 18:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar |
For this and this edits! -- Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 10:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hello! You tagged the last paragraph of lead with {{ citation needed}}. I failed to identify the claims that are exclusive to lead and not supported in the rest of article, so I removed the tag. Could you please help me identify the problematic claim? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk) 20:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Diemech TP 100, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specific fuel consumption ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)