Thanks for your contributions to
Aneeqa Bashir. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at
Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.
Thilsebatti (
talk) 14:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)reply
In addition, you are required by the
Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See
Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
Thilsebatti (
talk) 14:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Hello Thilsebatti,
Thank you for your feedback regarding the Aneeqa Bashir article. I appreciate your efforts in maintaining Wikipedia's content quality.
I'd like to clarify that I do not have any personal or professional relationship with Aneeqa Bashir. My intention in creating this article was to highlight the environmental efforts of an individual whose work I found noteworthy. I understand and respect Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest and have endeavored to contribute in an unbiased manner.
Regarding the additional sources needed to establish notability, I have utilized credible sources like Dawn, The News International, and Geo News. If there are specific types of sources or particular information you believe would enhance the article's notability and reliability, I would be grateful for your suggestions.
I acknowledge the concerns about language and grammatical issues in the article and will focus on improving these aspects. As a relatively new Wikipedia contributor, I am keen to learn and adhere to the platform's content policies. Any guidance or advice you can provide to help me refine the draft would be greatly appreciated.
Looking forward to your suggestions and further advice.
Afshaaan.ahmed (
talk) 05:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
If you do not have any personal or professional relationship, how were you able to take a picture of her earlier this month? —C.Fred (
talk) 05:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Thank you for raising your concern. I want to clarify that the photo of Aneeqa Bashir used in the article wasn’t personally taken by me. It was sourced from publicly available images, similar to those found in a
Google Images search. I’m dedicated to complying with Wikipedia’s guidelines and have no personal or professional relationship with the subject. My aim is to contribute constructively based on verifiable and publicly accessible information.
If there are specific aspects of the article that need improvement, I'm open to feedback and willing to make necessary changes.
Afshaaan.ahmed (
talk) 05:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Just checking in to see if you had a chance to look over my last message about the Aneeqa Bashir article. I explained about the photo and how it was sourced. I'm really trying to make sure everything in the article is up to Wikipedia standards and would love any advice or feedback you have.
Thanks for helping out, I'm still learning the ropes here.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Aneeqa Bashir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, Afshaaan.ahmed!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 141Pr {
contribs} 08:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Ahmad Rafay Alam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Thanks for reviewing the draft for Ahmad Rafay Alam. I see your point about needing more coverage from independent sources.
Could you maybe point me to a few examples of similar Pakistani profiles on Wikipedia? It'd help me understand what kind of sources I should be looking for. Alam's got quite a bit of coverage in big newspapers and journals, both in Pakistan and internationally, so I thought that might be enough, but I get that Wikipedia has its own way of doing things.
Any tips or examples you can share would be super helpful. I want to make sure I get this right.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Aneeqa Bashir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, Afshaaan.ahmed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Ahmad Rafay Alam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
FireflyBot (
talk) 11:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I have moved the article back to draft space, as it has not been improved since it was last refused at
WP:Articles for creation. Please do not return it to mainspace. Thank you -
Arjayay (
talk) 11:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply