![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
Adamstom.97,
I hope you have a great 2024 and hope to see you around when editing!
Dcdiehardfan (
talk) 01:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Dcdiehardfan ( talk) 01:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BigLordFlash --
BigLordFlash (
talk) 16:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings and
Talk:Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BigLordFlash --
BigLordFlash (
talk) 18:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! |
Hello Adamstom.97: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary
blisters. |
The article
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings for comments about the article, and
Talk:Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BigLordFlash --
BigLordFlash (
talk) 13:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
On 4 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a bus-chase sequence in Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings took more than a year to plan and was revised more than twenty times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Ganesha811 ( talk) 12:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hook update | |
Your hook reached 7,660 views (638.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2024 – nice work! |
GalliumBot ( talk • contribs) (he/ it) 03:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
With all due respect, I am only reverting one user. The other one meant to remove the name parameter entirely and mistakenly went back to the nowrap version. Learn to read the descriptions. GalaxyFighter55 ( talk) 00:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Star Trek: Lower Decks (season 1) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Cambalachero --
Cambalachero (
talk) 18:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey! Sorry if my last edit in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever troubled you for a bit. I had an automatic curly quote extension turned on and didn't realise until I looked at the bytes changed. Whoops!
Thanks for reverting it back, though :)
Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 06:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
The article
Star Trek: Lower Decks (season 1) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Star Trek: Lower Decks (season 1) for comments about the article, and
Talk:Star Trek: Lower Decks (season 1)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Cambalachero --
Cambalachero (
talk) 17:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Adamstom.97. I'm just posting to let you know that
List of Marvel Cinematic Universe film actors (The Infinity Saga) – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been submitted as a candidate to be featured on the Main Page as
Today's featured list. The proposed content can be seen
here. You are more than welcome to post your thoughts on the nomination. Regards, --
Zoo
Blazer 09:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the wikipedia page and for clarifying any mishaps! Arodroe25 ( talk) 23:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey, if you have a little free wiki time soon, would you want to do an image review for my first FAC? The prose and source reviews are pretty well covered, so I'm mostly just looking for an experienced editor to do the image review even though it's probably the easiest part of the FAC review process. No worries if you're too busy or uninterested. -- Zoo Blazer 03:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
People read that page first and will think "oh hey Blu Del Barrio was a main in all of the seasons they appear", this could cause confusion because the other page says something different. Your logic of it being clutter makes no sense. ACase0000 ( talk) 03:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey, do you have any ideas of potential hooks for Phase One? All I'm coming up with are options that would fit individual films better as opposed to the Phase. -- Zoo Blazer 16:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Star Trek: Lower Decks season 2 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Cambalachero --
Cambalachero (
talk) 02:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The article
Star Trek: Lower Decks season 2 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Star Trek: Lower Decks season 2 for comments about the article, and
Talk:Star Trek: Lower Decks season 2/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Cambalachero --
Cambalachero (
talk) 17:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For some of your recent copy edits to Star Wars articles.
![]() |
I don't actually oppose your intent at bold redirecting episode summaries of a show to a page that treats them all encyclopaedically, but you are doing it wrong. If you move the page to draft space and then redirect, this is a backdoor deletion, that would - unchecked - see deletion of the contributer's edit history in those pages when they fall out of draft. The correct way to have done this boldly is simply to redirect the pages. Also, moving to draft boldly is ineligible on pages over 90 days old. These have been around for over a decade. Draftify should not be used. Now you have done this, and considering some or all of these have been to AfD before, the only route open for cleanup is AfD. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
that would - unchecked - ...Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Callisto is also in that scene btw 122.171.22.227 ( talk) 20:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
On 24 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Edgar Wright's pitch for an Ant-Man film in 2006 helped to shape the early films of Phase One of the Marvel Cinematic Universe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I agree, there was no reason for me to change the case of that piped link. My bad. But why did you change it, before and after me? Dicklyon ( talk) 18:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
On 7 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Star-Spangled Man, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the production team of the TV series The Falcon and the Winter Soldier created a highway more than five miles (8 km) long to capture visual effects for a truck action sequence for the episode " The Star-Spangled Man"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Star-Spangled Man. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Star-Spangled Man), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect formatting changes in what way? All I did was remove a word. SummeRStorM79 ( talk) 03:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Adamstom.97, you wrote "...recently given unnecessary disambiguation..." in your notice. That presupposes what the discussion is about, i.e. it is taking sides, the one thing that is absolutely not ok in notices. I'd be very grateful if you could remove the word "unnecessary" to preserve strict neutrality. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 20:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for discussing. However you should never use adjectives, especially those that have a strong pejorative meaning like redundant or unnecessary, in any notice. Notices must be strictly and unequivocally neutral in everybody's eyes, which that one certainly was not. Any editor taking upon themselves to issue a notice is responsible for ensuring they are seen not to be trying to influence or canvass in any way, however subtle. I do hope this is clear as it is enforced by policy. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 22:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey Adamstom.97! I've been seeing your additions to X-Men '97, overall great work. So I'm also somewhat surprised, with your contributions and experience here, that you reverted again the unsourced claim about Karliak also voicing the Hulk. WP:BURDEN means that anyone that it is up to the person who restores previously unsourced information to add a source. A "citation needed" isn't suitable a placeholder. I'm confident you'll find a source quickly, and I won't remove the bit again to make a point, but like you said so yourself ( #Deadpool & Wolverine): all information needs to be supported by a reliable source. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 04:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)