{{ helpme}} I just decided to start this account so that I can help improve aquarium fish related articles. So, please forgive any initial unfamiliarity with wikis. Is there anyway my signature can have the “Sunshine” be in yellow? Also, can anyone help to make my user page look more aquarium-esque? I see other users have these user boxes. Are there any fish related ones I can use? Finally, are there any tropical fish editing groups or anything like that I can join on this site? Thanks! A Pocket Full of Sunshine ( talk) 13:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
[[User:A Pocket Full of Sunshine|A Pocket Full of]] [[User talk:A Pocket Full of Sunshine|<span style="color:gold;">Sunshine</span>]]
There is a wikiproject --> Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes and its talk page - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes, where you can ask questions. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 14:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
PS: I am in Australia and am about to go to sleep. A little bit larger and an interesting fact and it can go on DYK suggestion list. I'll check in tomorrow. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 14:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
I saw that you also joined WP:AQF, and I just wanted to also welcome you to Wikipedia. I'm not much of an expert on custom signatures, but I'm generally happy to try to answer questions. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 18:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
I have uploaded some aquarium photographs for possible future use in articles. Could someone please make these into a gallery on my user page? Thanks!
A Pocket Full of
Sunshine 14:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ helpme}} Can someone please help to line my userboxes up the right side of the screen as other users seem to have? Thanks! A Pocket Full of Sunshine 16:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I've just seen the photos posted under Fire Belly Newts and think you might want to remove them and take clearer photos. I'm having a hard time visuallizing the animal because your photo is really out of focus. Do learn to use the macro function on your camera before you take a close up photo, ok? Cheers sehsuan ( talk)
![]() Issue XII - August 2010 | |
|
|
Hello fellow project member. You've expressed that you're good with uploading images...I'm working on the Painted turtle article and it could really use a dist. map. I have one saved on my desktop as a screenshot (it's from a google book that requires some money to look at). Anyway, if you're interested in helping me, I would need your e-mail address, and would much appreciate it.-- NYMFan69-86 ( talk) 15:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
At WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, in which you are listed as a member, we're working on a pretty massive backlog (1000+ articles!) of unassessed articles. We would appreciate it greatly if you would help assess the articles in the link. It's simple to do!
It's not a difficult task, but there's a lot to get done. Our hope is that we can chip through the backlog and assess every article within the auspices of the project. Thanks, bibliomaniac 1 5 00:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() Issue XII - January 2011 | |
|
|
A notification that the Templates for Discussion discussion (oy, repetition) has been taken to a deletion review discussion. The Article Rescue Squadron was notified, and as notifications to previous involved parties isn't normal practise, I and a few ARS members agreed that, in the interests of transparency and fairness, we should let everyone know...hence this talkpage message ;).
If anyone has an issue with me sending these out, do drop me a note on my talkpage. Regards, Ironholds ( talk) 10:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WR Reader. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Reyk (
talk •
contribs)
A Pocket Full of Sunshine ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am making this request per checkuser and administrator HelloAnnoying's comment here. I have not done anything since his post that justified a different admin ignoring his decision. I apologize if I did anything wrong, but I am an article creator with good contributions and request another chance. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Decline reason:
OK, here's what I see...
I'd need to see you address all of those problems before I'd even consider the possibility of an unblock -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A Pocket Full of Sunshine ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Okay. As you can see at here, there is next to no similarity between myself and the other account. There is ONE discussion in which we both commented. I did not count exactly, but it appears that dozens of different editors commented in that same discussion. We share no other overlapping or similar edits. That other account has commented in several other discussions, none of which I ever participated in. Heck, I would not have even commented in that one discussion had it not been brought to my attention. I use a major ISP that perhaps millions use. It would not surprise me that in any discussion with so many participants, at least a few editors have IPs from that company. I see the checkuser did not even say "Confirmed", which is hardly a shocker, because I am guessing the only similarities was having an IP from the same company and commenting in one discussion together. I may not be able to persuade that you that that other account is not mine and heck, it might even seem wise to just pretend it is so I could offer some bogus apology or something, but I am not willing to lie just to get unblocked, because I refuse to have such an account as that other one associated with me. The other guy/gal may well be someone's sock account, but nope, it is not mine. My edit history is making contributions to fish articles. There is nothing really similar about me and the other account. I commented in one discussion with dozens of others. I wouldn't be surprised if several people in that discussion, including those who voted the other way use the same ISP as I do. I should not be railroaded on a possible hunch by some that someone else who is not in fact confirmed to be me and cannot possibly be because it isn't. I can tell you one thing, I will not get duped into commenting in any discussions from off site guys again!
Decline reason:
Enough with this. The disruption you've caused lately is really quite astonishing. You know where to go to request an unban, in 6 months per WP:OFFER. Amalthea 00:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.