Welcome!
Hello, A Kit Agore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -
Ahunt (
talk) 23:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Smith & Wesson M&P15 may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | unit_cost = $839–1,949 ([[Suggested retail price|MSRP]])<ref name="Product listinghttp://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Category4_750001_
- 1%26storeId%3D750001%26filterResults%3D%26useFilter%3D%26identifier%3D1387578858186 Product listing</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi A Kit Agore! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hi. I hope you enjoyed the coal that (no doubt) the Santa of Wikimedia left in your stocking. Your place on the naughty list seems fated, but (glutton that I am) here is yet another reminder about the ills of abusing multiple accounts, refusing to engage in CON, ignoring the basic VER tenets of the project, and generally being a disruptive so-and-so.
I might as well also point out (for the umpteenth time) that your flat refusal to use edit summaries makes it IMPOSSIBLE to AGF for ANYTHING you do. (Bluntly most of your edits are indefensible under any project norms, so I am not really surprised, but at least if you TRIED then other contributors could consider what to do with your edits).
As I've said about a dozen times before, if you had half a notion to actually behave yourself within the established norms of the project, then you might actually have something positive to contribute. But this ludicrous multiple-user-hopping garbage is NOT the way to behave. Happy.... ah whats the point .... Guliolopez ( talk) 16:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I've been avoiding it for months (years even), but I've (re)opened an SPI request. It's not fair that you continue to make changes outside the bounds of the project tenets. I (and others) have given you enough chances, and you keep spurning them. Previous SPIs I've allowed to die or lapse (just as an exercise in warning or reminder), but I'll pursue this one. Enough. Guliolopez ( talk) 18:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- (Oh, and I'm going to excise that COPYVIO stuff as well. It shouldn't stand. Guliolopez ( talk) 18:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC))
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
MFIreland (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Mark Arsten (
talk) 06:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC) |