![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Wikipedia's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 16:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
To start it would to be as you are now. But if it were to be dismissed, it could be switched. I just think you are a great editor that should have the respect of a registered editor of your status. Wikipedia's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 02:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
dismissed as in treated as a joke and deleted. Wikipedia's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 02:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for redirecting my report- I wasn't sure where to post that. Hopefully some bans will at least slow the spammer down... -- Noren 18:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Please block me indefinitely or until the sun blows up, which ever one happens first, I make legal threats, personal attacks, insert penis pictures into articles, make zillions of sockpuppets, remove legitimate warnings from my talk page, TROLL, move pages to "X ON WHEELS!!!", think Wikipedia is Communism, live in North Carolina, am named "Johnny", try to impersonate and harass Hephaestos, am butt buddies with Bobby Boulders, sexually harrass female admins that I have no chance with, rape children, shoot cops, and hate GOD. 205.188.116.130 04:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Oddball Barnstar | |
You are awarded the Oddball Barnstar for ... well, for being you. -- Nlu ( talk) 04:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC) |
I was just curious about what numbers you've racked up as an anonymous contributor so I put you through User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js and here's what came out.
Username 68.39.174.238 Total edits 14606 Distinct pages edited 8855 Average edits/page 1.649 First edit 11:21, 26 September 2005 (main) 8603 Talk 685 User 623 User talk 2233 Image 367 Image talk 38 MediaWiki talk 6 Template 412 Template talk 42 Help 2 Category 14 Wikipedia 1388 Wikipedia talk 139 Portal 51 Portal talk 3
Most impressive indeed! It's nearly 3 times more than my count. = ) Once again I salute you. Cheers -- Netsnipe ► 13:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Woah! Simply south 22:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving. // Pilotguy ( Have your say) 01:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
They do look a bit suspicious, but Metal Archives confirms that Tundra [2] and Frostmoon [3] exist. I can't really say much about Domen, but it comes up on Google [4] and the author seems to be in good faith so I assume it's real. Thanks for your comments. Prolog 04:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
I will convert it to SVg while I'm at it, though I wish you would have told me on my talk page, I stumbled apon it by chance. Why is it that you do not have a main page? Do you value your anominimity to let your identity be only known as a string of numbers? Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 09:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this, a friend who found it hilarious posted at BJAODN with my permission. Right after it was posted, however, the user who wrote it originally vandalized it (at BJAODN) to make it seem more sympathetic to his/her position, and it remained that way until I fixed it just now. I think that's why it seemed a bit harsh. Thanks for the head's up. · j e r s y k o talk · 16:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Please verify the source for Image:EUTooManyStars.jpg - I got a notice on my talk page that it would be deleted for lack of source, so I put that it was made by you. If this is not the case, can you show where you got it? Cheers! bd2412 T 21:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and
create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to
sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it.
⇒
Bayerischermann
- 00:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 01:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my userpage. DVD+ R/W 01:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
In the future, please use {{subst:prod|reason}} instead of {{prod|reason}}. This assigns the date to the article, and ensures that the article is dealt with in a timely way. -- Roninbk t c # 23:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Worker's Barnstar | |
Congradulations for reaching 15000 edits in almost exactly one year. At this rate, you could reach 50000 edits by the start of 2009. Be proud of your high edit count! Scobell302 04:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC) |
Now who up and protected this page about 16 days after the last vandalization?! Now that's annoying! 68.39.174.238 13:29, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Protected pages are noxious, and that page has some formatting issues. However the protected prevents me yayaya (Old hat since you asked me about it 1st). There are an infuriating number of such subpages that are protected unendingly because of people who can't tell, or just don't care. EG. Roitr and Bonaparte. Anyway yes I want to be able to edit that page ;D! 68.39.174.238 02:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
If you want a real Primetime expert, talk to Connel MacKenzie over at Wiktionary wikt:User talk:Connel MacKenzie, where he is probably one of the best administrator there. He first brought notice of this plagiarist's activities here after fighting him over at Wiktionary. I just mostly catalog other user's work in fighting vandalism here, though I will report and clean up vandalism myself when I spot it. I also report vandals spotted by others when their reports are not put in the right place, like Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. The only two times I have tangled with this vandal is when someone reported one of his socks at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard and when I spotted a confession. My work on Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Primetime was mostly to tidy up the page and to add missing information, like his Jimbo Wales ban and an infobox. Jesse Viviano 05:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Where else are you supposed to list a massive Wikinews vandal? Wikinews does not have a long term abuse page.-- B&W Anime Fan 18:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
..Hope your not off the charts mad :-), but your talk page was just way too long. I couldn't help myself. If you really want to revert me, go ahead. - Mike | trick or treat 03:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Would you object to having your userpage automatically redirect here? I really wouldn't call that a userpage, just convenience. *Chaos ensues* :-) - Mike | trick or treat 03:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Please email me in private at alau.wiki at Gmail com. I'm exercising WP:DENY since I know exactly who was responsible. -- Netsnipe ► 10:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
You posted on my talk page. Was it meant for another user? I can't make sense of it. Shin'ou's TTV ( Futaba| Masago| Kotobuki) 14:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
"Suggestion" won't work under WP:U (see archive). Simply south 16:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
The "debate" over using your IP adress as a username. Simply south 20:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate that he doesn't need to be listed on LTA anymore (Since that was just notorious trolling), but do you have to remove every possibly reference to that vandal? 68.39.174.238 20:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I haven't seen you on Wiktionary in a while, so I forgot your numeric IP when I rolled back your changes to WP:'T. I haven't checked all of your edits there yet, but the one that triggered my rollback was your removal of Rickyboy as a sock.
Perhaps you could discuss it with WillBeBack before removing that (or any others) again.
(I wish I knew what I did with that javascriptlet that applied your username to you. I never should have deleted it.)
-- Connel MacKenzie - wikt 01:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Your speedy-spam tag on Raritan Computer was removed by another editor because the article has already survived an AfD. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raritan Computer. The article can still probably be improved, though. -- TruthbringerToronto ( Talk | contribs) 04:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Deregulation of the Texas Electricity Market on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AAA! 03:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, my mistake... -- AAA! 03:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi anonymous user, I saw your last edits and reverted them here. I guess you had deleted the links because someone was trying to advertise for products (see definition of what´s spam under Wikipedia:Spam). I have no advertising interest at all: I inserted them there because I think that if there are only few manufacturers, then this is relevant to the topic. If I´m wrong about this, please tell me, but please also giving a precise reference to which criterion on Wikipedia:Spam would be infringed. The links really look okay to me. Cheers, -- Chris Howard 22:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
... to say thanks for this. That's one big flower, and one warm & fuzzy feeling. I appreciate it, but as always, did not find a moment to say thanks. Renata 11:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't recall giving that one...and generally ONLY give them now to ppl who have contributed positively, at least once. My bad, I guess. Kukini 07:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
How did you get those tools on the top of your user talk page? I want them on mine as well. Best, Kukini 07:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I moved it from user talk to your userspace - hopefully this is a bit better. Anything you want created in userspace, I'll make for you! -- SunStar Net 23:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Speaking of that page, I want to tell you that Flexiwire ( talk · contribs) made a post today claiming to be behind both WoW (original) and WiC. I think you should probably examine this info and, if necessary, incorporate it into the Newgatery page. Scobell302 02:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
I strongly suspect that Shultz ( talk · contribs) (aka Shultz III ( talk · contribs), Shultz IV ( talk · contribs), 68.102.193.78 ( talk · contribs)) is the Juche vandal on the Korean Wikipedia. Shultz (and his IP) has been known to create redirects of "Kim Il Sung city" to "Seoul" and "Roh Moo Hyun city" to "Pyongyang" across several different Wikis (en, ko, ru to name a few), and one major theme of the Juche vandal was to redirect "Seoul" to "Kim Il Sung City", "Busan" to "Kim Jong Il City", and (less frequently) "Pyongyang" to "Roh Moo Hyun City". In addition, Shultz's IP has made a substantial amount of edits on the Korean Wikipedia related to the WiC template and marking socks. Finally, the Juche vandal announced its retirement on September 11, the same day as Shultz (as Shultz IV)'s last known edit. For more information, please check the contributions for the accounts listed above, as well as the contribs/talk pages of 68.102.193.78 on the Korean and Russian Wikipedias (possible other Wikis as well). (Please note that I'm about to sign off for tonight, so you don't need to respond on my talk page.) Scobell302 03:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Question and reply copied here from my talk page:
"In this edit, isn't 4 still a majority of 6, or is there some supermajority requirement for closing a case? 68.39.174.238 19:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Just a quick note to thank you for de-SPAMMING Validation (drug manufacture). It has been on my watchlist for sometime, as I have been awaiting a new growth of thick skin. -- DO11.10 02:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi 68!
Thanks for your many contributions to Wikipedia. Is there a reason you keep adding banned-user templates to CoolKatt's userpage? This user, as far as I can tell, has not been banned, and may return after his block expires. He may not edit US TV station articles, but may edit other articles. Adding a banned user template to a user who is not permabanned is a bad idea, per the policy at WP:BAN: Wikipedia's hope for banned users is that they will leave Wikipedia with their pride and dignity intact, whether permanently or for the duration of their ban. As such, it is inappropriate to bait banned users or take advantage of their ban to mock them. While your edit may have not been intended to mock this user, adding a banned user template for a user who has not been banned from editing will only add fuel to the fire, and will not allow this user to make a dignified exit. Firsfron of Ronchester 22:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Wow your Newgatery subpage is great. I recently had a run-in with an unusual vandal that created several random pages, and replaced a talk page and subsequently my user page and talk page, with the Denver International Airport article. The block log refers to them as "the airport vandal". Do you know anything about this vandal? Might it be an appropriate addition to your wall of shame? I certainly consider them unusual but I'm not sure if they're notable :) Dylan Lake ( t· c· ε) 00:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
First of all, I must admit my initial "anon-biggotry." I feel ashamed. :) You have a longer history here then I do.
I appreciate your offer... I think RFCU would reject my request since there is no community/arbcom ban and there hasn't been any "votestacking". If you can help me start a Puppet case that would be great. --- J.S ( t| c) 23:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Posted on WP:ANI already. No responce yet. I'll give it till monday then I'll... ummm no idea. lol --- J.S ( t| c) 22:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Several months ago you inserted a template indicating a tonal problem with the article, but never explained what the problem was. Could you leave a comment on its talk page explaining your complaint so that it can be corrected? -- VGF11 00:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it looks like most of the articles/edits by this user are legit, although the notability of at least one , Clement John Tranter is questionable at best. I get the idea someone may have Wikijacked his user account, maybe he saved his password and his kid is playing with his 'pooter when he ain't around. Just a WAG. Tubezone 20:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I like the changes... but we've shifted gears to just removing the links. (Shooting first, asking questions latter... :)) Most of the articles we run across don't really have active editing going on. --- J.S ( t| c) 07:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I wish there was a username barnstar... 68.39.174.238 17:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
I forgot already. =( It had something to do with Esperanza, an organization that I am a member of. Perhaps you commented just recently during an MfD against Esperanza or during the Overhaul.-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 03:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Well then, it would appear my joke has failed. Thanks for the info. Wavy G 02:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
As far as the copyvio on this article is concerned, I have no way of knowing whether the content was used without permission or not. Either way, I am glad that we are rid of it. Thanks. --- Charles 04:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
yes, that's right. User:Pedant 02:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Yes I'd spotted 83.146.0.146 isn't 68.39.174 and I also agree with the clean-up flags etc although it is always nice to have help as well as flags...best wishes -- BozMo talk 07:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
BTW I think you need to move your new site listings to Public_domain_image_resources rather than the Public Domain talk pages -- BozMo talk 11:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind deleting the revision of my talk page that you reverted? It was loaded with personal infos and while I may not like the uzers mentioned, I don't think that level of "4th wall breaking" is justified by anything I've seen them do. 68.39.174.238 02:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
It appears to be a database glitch. I get a message he is blocked when I try to block him, it's just not showing properly. (see User_talk:HighInBC/Archive_14#User:Sword_of_Christ). - Mgm| (talk) 09:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
The article text was written when the article was in its present location but the page history was lost when it was moved and the incorrectly move-reverted. Some more article history but not all is on the corresponding Wikipedia space page. That make sense? -- BozMo talk 06:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
New Section —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.156.81.187 ( talk) 18:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC).
Thanx for whacking Primetime's latest round of sockpuppetry and trolling. Can I ask for some help? He's trying to save his reputation by attacking me on Commons. See commons:User:HQCentral and commons:User:Temp. Thanx for whatever happens. 68.39.174.238 07:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Wow, thanks! I never heard of Primetime. Naturally, I filed an RFCU as I would have done to another user I'm watching. (see Cute 1 4 u). However, when I saw WP:'T, I was appalled by the blatant violations this user has committed! Academic honesty is enforced in all high schools and universities, and that user should know better!-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 04:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for the Speedy tags on those two nonsense articles by Lord Tortiville II ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who also twice added nonsense to Back to the Future about time travel by head trauma. The first time for that vandal edit was as Bluechevylover ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on 12/11. I didn't quite know what to do other than put a test4 on the new name and (after some research) a hoax tag on the new articles. Speedy? Suspected Sock? I haven't done either of those templates to date, so I was nervous about trying that. Thank you for rushing in where I feared to tread! I'll have to memorize your IP now. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 08:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to George Schlatter. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Lcarsdata 20:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
When
editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "
Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the
Recent changes page, in the
page revision history, on the
diff page, and in the
watchlists of users who are watching that article. See
m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
Lcarsdata 20:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I think this has happened in a lot of cases, and I'm going to (hopefully) have Carnildo run Orphanbot on all the untagged images to see which have no licence (as the licence on a coat of arms is dubious at the best of times). Thanks, M a rtinp23 23:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Would you mind if this were deleted? Have you seen WP:DENY? User:Zoe| (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
I understand your reasoning, but how do you reconcile it with DENY? User:Zoe| (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, I'm not too sure how I feel about DENY myself, so I'm not going to do anything about it, but don't be surprised if somebody doesn't list it for MfD some day. User:Zoe| (talk) 00:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Cheers. :) User:Zoe| (talk) 00:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance ( diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as using a shared IP address to edit a page that experiences malicious edits by users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges or open proxies. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of server or shared IP ranges and new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. // VoABot II 04:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Warning removed
Thanks for your suggestions about security on the Swahili wikipedia. Could you please get in contact with the sysop for the site, http://sw.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Matt_Crypto , since he is the person who would need to implement? Thanks, Malangali 22:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Increase_Mather#Screw_it_screw_it_screw_it_screw_it. -- Fl e x ( talk| contribs) 02:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. Any chance you could make some specific requests on remaining changes to 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection to get the clean up tag removed? I have had a go but am a bit blind to it now. -- BozMo talk 09:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
it just seems like the article has been copied from some Fans website and pasted here , which is against the copyrights conditions , review the edits History to make sure it haven't been copied and pasted and then remove the template {{ copypasted }} from the article , and thanks for co-operation :) , such singers and actors articles usually been copied from somewhere , sorry friend :) Ammar 03:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Hiya. :) I can completely understand why you'd think all that information was copied and pasted from somewhere, but it was actually all information I got by digging around, asking friends, asking Steve himself (or being around when Steve was asked certain things), etc. Back when Steve was still pretty new to OLP, I was going to make a fansite for him, but didn't end up doing it... so that's why I went and gathered together a lot of that info (just in case you were wondering haha). Sadly, I can't really cite my sources, because it's impossible to cite a conversation you had with a person in real life.-- Nikki4982 06:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Don Blandford, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. --// >|< Shablog 23:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Microfluidics ( diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this copyright violation & tips for the future. Tafkam 11:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
The userboxes came from the Wikipedia Apple (or was it Macintosh ... one of the two) and Windows pages, and I'm pretty sure they didn't have a fair use on them, meaning that they couldn't be copyright boxes - I think, however if you would kindly direct me to a simmilar microsoft/mac userbox I'd gladly change. Danielfolsom 13:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Can you clarify the reason for deleting Image:Erdferkel-drawing.jp]? I wasn't sure what exactly the problem was, and since it's linked to an article, I didn't want to delete it just yet. Let me knoq. See, Pilotguy can remain anonymous too. -- 66.56.158.36 20:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey 68.39.174.238! Thought I'd let you have the latest updates. However, don't let this let you have editcountitis! SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 22:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Category talk | 2 |
Category | 19 |
Help | 2 |
Image talk | 46 |
Image | 403 |
Mainspace | 9820 |
MediaWiki talk | 6 |
Portal talk | 3 |
Portal | 71 |
Talk | 918 |
Template talk | 64 |
Template | 524 |
User talk | 2445 |
User | 508 |
Wikipedia talk | 253 |
Wikipedia | 2055 |
avg edits per article | 1.71 |
earliest | 01:21, 26 September 2005 |
number of unique articles | 10006 |
total | 17139 |
Wow, you've got a lot! Simply south 23:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Nope, it's not the same or comparable to the deleted version. The deleted version was three paragraphs long and did not assert the nobility of the article in any meaningful way. -→ Buchanan-Hermit™/ ?! 00:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Please note that Canderous ( talk · contribs) has recently added information on the North Carolina Vandal and Bobby Boulders into your Newgatery page. I'm not sure whether you were ready to document these vandals, but if you are, feel free to expand/modify his writing; if not, you can delete those sections and drop Canderous a note about this. Scob e ll302 08:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for remaining anonymous and showing those irritating template-posters that anonymous IP does not automatically equal vandal. I have been searching for someone like you for ages.
Then again, since you gained notoriety as a vandal-fighter and would therefore be an admin by now if you had an account, I don't know if you're actually a tosser. But for now, I love you. -- 90.240.34.177 01:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I took a look at the page, and I think that while it's a good idea, what we have is a source problem, not a spam problem. Even if we account for socks being multiple users, we're not going to get any more than maybe 10 articles it shows up in. Furthermore, there has to be rationale for blocking, and it can always be unblocked later. However, it gives me an interesting idea, which I will have to think on a bit. MSJapan 17:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for giving the PNG crusade bot a star. I'm glad to know someone appreciates my work!
I noticed that you recently made an edit to your userpage with the comment "Added text to force update". Did you know that you can force an update to the page just by adding &action=purge
to the end of the URI? Take a look at
Wikipedia:Purge, it might be helpful to you in the future. —
Remember the dot (
t) 04:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
That rarely works, especially when Primetime decides to perpetrate some malicious page moves. 68.39.174.238 14:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Ah, okay. — Remember the dot ( t) 00:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and thanks for the info about Primetime. I didn't know that anyone took vandalism to such an extreme. — Remember the dot ( t) 00:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, it's a shweet name. I'll make me sig more interesting, hang on a tick... -- Wikify me, captain! 05:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
There we go! Thanks for the award, by the way. ;) -- Captain Wikify Argh! 05:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Check this out: [12]. Apparently the guy reads the image talk page and thinks I'm Jimbo Wales. - Will Beback · † · 01:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, what? The Fish 19:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Are any of the following IPs related (or even identical) to you?
Scob e ll302 12:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, i noticed you changed many parts of the Electricity Meter article, and I reverted them. I see you are not a vandal, let me know if you would like them reverted. DUBJAY04 00:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind note about hoax-fighting. I like the humor in Kevanbd's hoaxes, and I just wish he devoted his writing skills to fact instead of fiction. He's capable of genuine contributions, but the UBS hoaxes did get a little tedious after a while. Thanks again! Casey Abell 18:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I guess that was a very good suggestion, then, given the current circumstances. Thanks for keeping up with it, too. MSJapan 20:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)