Done. See Image:FireFox-edits.png. Your use of edit summaries is 85% overall, 97.4% over last 500 edits. Your average # of edits per day is 40.48. If you stopped using Wikipedia, I estimate it would take 8.3 days for the uncontrollable urges and tremors to go away, assuming appropriate treatment. Without treatment, you're likely to end up being a homeless bag man sitting just outside the property line of your local Wal-Mart with a sign that reads "will code xhtml for food". -- Durin 20:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks! Tedernst | Talk 22:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
I want to make template looks like this->. Named Infobox television black, a black version of Infobox television
Sorry it was honestly an accident >_< if you look at this link, near the bottom, you'll see I actually added new content as well as deleting the rest -What I actually did was click to edit one section.... but i have no idea why it deleted everything BUT that section :/ browser problem i guess...
again please see http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Batman_comics&diff=prev&oldid=30110008 and think of WP good faith as you can see my edit was actualyl constructive near the bottom :/ -- 65.98.21.69 19:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
There is one who uses at least 3 IPs until now. 81.182.104.136 & 81.182.195.63 & 81.182.20.159. He is just a vandal who promotes fascism. -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 20:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi there FireFox, it's Moe Epsilon. I hope you didn't take anything personally on the Esperanza talk page earlier today when we were talking about the Stressbusters and everything. Sorry if you did. — Moe ε 02:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for removing vandalism from my user page. -- A dam1213 Talk + 05:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks a ton for your support on my rfa, the final tally was 50-0-0; I'll try and live up to the expectations of others and do my best in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. btw, your signature is really cool. -- Gurubrahma 14:34, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you, FireFox, for your support in my RfA - I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality of Wikipedia rise to the level of the dream. BD2412 T 02:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC) <--note new "admin gold" sig :-D
FireFox, thanks for your support on my RfA. The final count was 46/0/0. I hope I'll live up to your faith in me in my use of the mop and bucket. Please accept this wikithanks as a token of my gratitude ;) Kudos on all those worthy projects you're involved in. -- bainer ( talk) 23:52, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Dear FireFox,
I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. Even though it failed with a with the final tally of 55/22/6, I want to thank you anyways. I don't want to be one a admin anymore until I reach 10,000 edits now that it's over with. Thanks -- Jaranda wat's sup 03:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)FireFox:
Just writing a quick note to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. My goal as an admin is to never give you a reason to regret supporting my RFA. And thanks for the compliment on my sig. I think it's pretty spiffy myself. =)
All the best.
→
Ξxtreme Unction {
yakł
blah} 15:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. ^_^ (I do intend on giving better support thanks, but since I dislike copy-and-paste messages it'll take me a while to get down to your page.) On a related note, my tally should be 23/0/0 since Izehar voted twice. ;) // Pathoschild 08:14, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello, FireFox. Thanks for your help with the blocking. Things seem to be working okay now. -- PFHLai 10:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
I've been trying to clear out the issues with npov from humanism for a few days now and there is some resistance in the form of one person. why have you intervened on behalf of the only person? if you follow his edit trail, you'll come to see that although that several of us, 3 people, have agreed that we need to be inclusive of Catholic humanists, and other forms of humanism. there is a long discussion of the changes and their justification in the talk section. I need an accurate and neutral article on humanism for my class to read in the spring, and currently, the article isn't accurate. -- Buridan 13:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
As the Coast Guard lists them as lights rather than lighthouses, and most other articles on the subject use light rather than lighthouse, I was trying to keep things consistent. If there is a consensus on always using lighthouse, please point me to it. Otherwise, I would appreciate it if you did not move articles I have just created without checking with me. -- Dalbury( Talk) 13:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
I don't quite understand why you reverted my changes. I actually spent a great deal of time rewriting the article. I'm trying to improve many of the article related to Oregon Politicans. Please explain why you reverted. Davidpdx 14:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello FireFox. I do not know whether this is the kind of question I should be asking, but what kind of things do you have to do to become an administrator? I have been told that administrator privileges can be very useful to an active CVU member, like me (and you). Please reply -- The Neokid 19:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC).
Response to your message on User talk:Theneokid: Thanks for the advice FireFox. I am sure it will be useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theneokid ( talk • contribs)
I have been looking at what you have done on Wikipedia and have decided to award you this Barnstar for your great effort!
..not Easter! Thanks for the birthday greetings. All the best Ban e s 21:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
This is mainly concerning your edits. Im not bitching at you, snarling, being aggressive or cold, but the edits your making to Alternative Metal are leading me, and several others watching them, further down the path of believing the article needs to be merged. Might i recommend to you, that even though you have been here a long time, that you not let your passion for the article take over your sense of writing. Many of the edits your making are filling out the history. Thats good, really good, except its the history of Nu Metal in general. Also, many of the edits are coming off as unencylopedic, or POV. Things such as 'metallish alternativish bands' over 'sungenre'? That some what says unecnyclopedic and POV.
I do seriously think you could make this article better. In the mean time, i suggest you chalk up a temp page and make revisions there, or, do it on a word document before you save anything direct to the article, so things like this can be discussed and a consensus reached.
Otherwise, go for it, but seriously, you need to start correcting the problems with the article, as at the minute, you seem to be furthering them. Leyasu 08:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
You have been awarded these balloons for no apperant reason. -- Cool Cat Talk| @ 20:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello, fellow Esperanzians! This is just a friendly reminder that elections for Administrator General and two advisory council positions have just begun. Voting will last until Friday, December 30, so make sure you exercise your right to vote! Also, I'm pleased to announce the creation of the Esperanza mailing list. I urge all members to join; see Wikipedia:Esperanza/Contact for more information. All you need to do is email me and I will activate your account. This will be a great way to relax, stay in touch, and hear important announcements. Thanks! Flcelloguy ( A note?)
This message was delivered to all Esperanza members by our acting messenger, Redvers. If you do not wish to receive further messages, please list yourself at WP:ESP/S. Thanks.
I ask your help Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Doom127_accusing_me_to_be_a_Sock_puppet Thanks. -- Quackshot 22:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
This message is regarding the page User:Celestianpower. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Cel e stianpower háblame 15:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
This message is regarding the page User:Celestianpower. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Cel e stianpower háblame 15:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
This message is regarding the page User:Celestianpower. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Cel e stianpower háblame 15:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Gee. Thanks. Now that I have a Barnstar, can I ask a little favor? Could you ask User:Geni to unlock the User:Amorrow page? I am Andrew Morrow. The Elizabeth Morgan article, which I wrote, was a very upsetting thing to create and in late July it was hijacked and butchered and I wrote the some message I should not have.
When I was boy in Boy Scouts, I once left my tag on the board at the lake at Boy Scout camp. You know, the one to show that you are swimming there. Of course, they started to search the lake and the camp, looking for me. When they found me, the punishment was several hours of cleaning seaweed out of the roped off swimming area. I had to do my punishment in public, but once punishment was over, that was it.
My ex-wife, a physician, took my only child, my daughter, away from me when she was only three weeks old. Needless to say, that kind of punishment never really ends. That is part of the reason why I care so much about the Elizabeth Morgan story. I was hoping it would only take up one page, but I now see that it is better that it take up the full three pages at Wikipedia that it deserves. Of course, nobody involved in the July indicent thought that way: they just butchered the article of all of its references, and then I got upset and wrote a bad thing. Also, my daughter's name is also A. Morrow and I would like to think that if she ever Google'd "amorrow", that Geni's narrow characterization of me would not be the first thing she sees.
I would like User:Amorrow page unlocked. Not the account, just the user page. -- Fplay 17:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Congratulations!!! You've earned yourself a barnstar! Fir e Fox 17:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Gee thanks! In 1.5 years of daily edits this is the first.No reason needed, just nice to be recognized. Positive way to start off my new blank talk page also. -- Stbalbach 18:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Can you delete this article? It was created by Smigger1989, a new user who probably didn't realize what it was doing. -- Violin G irl ♪ 20:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Apparently your user page has been vandalised 42 times. That is a very large number! Is it the wikipedia record? J.J.Sagnella 20:08, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AMistress_Selina_Kyle&diff=31892234&oldid=31892067 - I recently received this edit from User:Automnial - my talk page history - I think it may be a "sockpuppet" of User:Kiand and would like you to check this out or get someone to check please if possible?
Thank you for any help. The message left was "blocked indefinitely because it is either inappropriate or too similar to an existing username" with a fake "signed" by yourself.
Do you think I should maybe bring this up with the administrators as a group on the special board thing or can you handle this yourself? I'm not sure on the procedures - This didn't fool me but I am angry that people are doing this kind of thing.. -- Mistress Selina Kyle 22:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.114.77.175 ( talk • contribs)
I've had enough of your threats mr. Sort yourself out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.125.153 ( talk • contribs)
and no of course it doesn't work, anyone can just use a proxy to evade the ban, your a fcking dumbass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.125.153 ( talk • contribs)
Lol that ban was real effective. Get a life you jackass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.211.141.65 ( talk • contribs)
PLEASE HELP: User talk:193.123.228.22 -- Wikicrusader 14:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Here is another guy 209.236.158.250 Wikicrusader 14:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
You may want to block User:Burps2006...he obviously [1] doesn't like you, either. I told another administrator because I thought they would get to it sooner, but they didn't, so here you are. -- Violin G irl ♪ 16:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I made a mistake at the admin intervention page, and noticed immediately. To my surprise, you happened to notice faster than I did, and fixed it even faster.
Are you Superman? ;-) Kareeser| Talk! 16:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Fir e Fox 17:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Since Angelina has claimed to be an atheist, I've included her under that category. For reasons unknown, you've seen fit to reverse my edit and to accuse me of vandalism. http://www.nndb.com/people/493/000023424/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.15.23 ( talk • contribs)
No problem, you're a popular guy tonight. ;-) Leithp (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Seen your reference about your sig. having problems. I have found a bug that does indeed mess up your sig., causing people to be falsely accused of being sockpuppets, and have reported this matter. Cheers. Martial Law 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC) :)
I have found some kind of glitch that can mess up your online signature, causing someone to be falsely declared to be a sockpuppet. This has been posted on WP:AN as well. Other people has also reported the existance of this bug. This is the glitch: You sign on as Martial Law, the sig looks like this: 123.233.567.45. Have been told that this is a known bug. You enable Cookies, clean out your browser caches, which I've done, and yet this bug still exists. Martial Law 22:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Is this the problem you're experiencing ? Martial Law 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
any administrators who are involved in the dispute must not edit this page whilst it is protected
Reminds me of you...
![]() | This user avoids insults for vandalism, moving straight to actual bodily harm |
Benon 14:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Eeeeehehehehe, here I am vandalizing FireFox's talk page! What a wicked, wicked fool I am! Eeeehehehehe!!!!!
Search
4
Lancer
17:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
You deleted Kung hei fat choi simply because someone put a speedy tag on it without looking at the discussions around it. The criteria for speedy deletes on redirects [2] didn't apply to that article. Please verify speedy deletes. SchmuckyTheCat 20:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah so someone already told this to me... I'm just a dumb slashdotter trying out the Wikipedia. Didn't realize it was so territorial what with y'all peeing all over my carpet. Don't get your skirt out of whack, settle down, have a beer. We're just here from Slashdot to look around. Judging by the number of hilarious edits on the page in question... I'd say my comment ain't far off the mark.
What does rvs mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 ( talk • contribs)
So are you saying you think my dialog with you is Strawberries?
That seems awfully rude. I thought you weren't supposed to "bite the n00bs"?
I asked a legitmate question, your rules and regulations don't permit you to just ignore me as such, or revert my comments. How am I supposed to learn the ropes if y'all revert me instead of talk to me?
I guess this means n00bs aren't welcome on Wikipedia.
While I care nothing for the article Boppers Cafe and it would have been deleted in any case, I see nothing in WP:CSD justifying its speedy deletion. CSD A7 (non-notable individuals or groups) does not cover instututions, corporations, businesses, buildings, or the like. Please be careful not to assume A7 covers more than it does. — Matthew Brown ( T: C) 01:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Why did you remove Ashida Kim's photo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felbeast ( talk • contribs)
soo, Firefox, what are your plans for Rajput? We cannot wait for peace to break out in South Asia before unprotecting. My take on the situation is that we have several users prepared for civil debate, viz. Taaoo ( talk · contribs), ImpuMozhi ( talk · contribs), AMbroodEY ( talk · contribs), Wisesabre ( talk · contribs), with varying grasp of civility, but they represent both camps and I think they could work together. The only users showing complete obstinance are DPSingh ( talk · contribs), Ss india ( talk · contribs), Shivraj Singh ( talk · contribs) plus their assorted IPs. SS and DP are hopeless cases, but Shivraj has his light moments, and he could possibly reform if the environment was better. If we can agree on a zero tolerance policy for trolling, PA and removal of sourced statements (immediate blocks), I do think the users mentioned could get some work done. You would, however, have to babysit the article, and take the abuse from the trolls you block. dab (ᛏ) 09:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I note that you have blocked wisesabre for 24 hrs -- certainly deserved; but is nothing to be said about Those Others who revert the page a dozen times a day without self-declaring those actions to be reverts?? Your promptness in acting on that complaint will only reinforce their apparent belief of you being their comrade-in-arms. In this connection, may I bring to your attention the following message, which I had left on some other admin's page a few days ago? No action then ensued, but I am hoping for some further promptness from you. Perhaps I should also clarify, given the state of matters here, that I am actually of the same broad "identity group" as Bachmann's opponents, but cannot abide them....here is my message, dealing with your recent correspondent:
Could you take a view on this, this and the Talk:Rajput page in general? That user's discourse is in general informed by this orientation; the futility of engaging with him is arguably indicated by this, this and other such. I am anxious to see something done, since I hold the views expressed by him in the second paragraph here!! The said gentleman (sic), whose ascertainable contributions to WP began on 08/Dec/05, has filed a complaint alleging bias and incivility by Dbachmann ( talk · contribs); do you think you could express a view on that complaint page? In that connection, reference to the contribution records of Shivraj Singh ( talk · contribs) and Ss india ( talk · contribs) may be useful. Regards, ImpuMozhi 05:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Furthermore, I will call your attention to this, addressed to a lady editor -- that user, another of the same group, was banned permanently; however, his edits continue under 210.187.49.65 ( talk · contribs). Regards, ImpuMozhi 15:00, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
I managed to add and correct some of the styles on the list of styles incorporated into Jeet Kune DO but Only 20 of the 26+4 styles are given,please can you help me find the remaining styles.
Thanks, Felbeast
Sorry man,I keep confusing you with Firestar WHY do admins keep such similar names???
You guy are crazy???? Felbeast 11:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Ashida Kim page is constantly vandalised by someone named John PEterson Lloyd who keeps changing IP addresses he claimed that the image was copyright removed on 14:32, 18 December 2005 by 220.247.231.218 (Image is copyright) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felbeast ( talk • contribs)
Greetings:
I just noticed, through a coincidental circumstance, that you deleted I Like Anime as a speedy delete, and cited A7 as your criteria.
Thing is, A7 only applies to biographical articles about individual people (or, now, quasi-biographical articles about bands and clubs). Even with the new expansion of its scope, it still does not cover "things". And as near as I can figure I Like Anime was an article about a "thing" rather than a person or a group of persons.
You may wish to restore the article and list it on AfD. There is a group of folks out there who seek any erroneous speedy deletion as a justification to cry for the complete dismantling of the speedy deletion process. AfD is generally the safer route.
All the best.
→
Ξxtreme Unction|
yakkity yak 13:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
User:Jan123 remade the article BXML again. Can you please have a look? -- Perfecto 15:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
This is a sockpuppet I just created
Is the username allowed? If not I will simply not log on it again
I☺☻♠♣☻♣♦likeicecream 20:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Re-instated previous page deletion (nn-bio). Notable author, another editor and myself have done substantial work in creating a viable article. Dunno who the anon editor is, but the work is excellent & verifiable. Just FYI - Ali-oops ✍ 00:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
For both removing and readding my name!
ε
γκυκλοπ
αίδεια
* 18:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. I think I've figured out what I was doing wrong; I was putting the username in the User box at the block log, which doesn't show anything (versus the Title box). Crazy stuff, eh? Anyway, thanks again for setting me straight (and for not being too harsh about it). Happy edits! Deltabeignet 20:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I HAVE QUESTION!!!! IF WIKI IS IN THE NOW THEN WHAT WHEN IF NEVER?? I MEAN ARE WE IN THE ARTICLE OF THE EDIT OR DO WE JUST TAKE A TROUBLE IN??? I DON'T GET THE SCREEN WITH ERASE IF...BUT YES, NO???? PLEASE GIVE ME SOME ADVICE THX!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 172.139.71.52 21:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
If you are unsure of something, search for it on Wikipedia's help section. Wikipedia is also in other languages, so maybe contributing to the Wikipedia in your native language would be the most helpfull of you. Leyasu 01:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Macintosh User 16:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi. Can you explain why you used your admin rollback tools on this edit? If you can avoid using admin tools except for fighting vandalism, that would be appreciated. Cheers, [[Sam Korn]] 20:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for quickly reverting the vandalism over at TV.com. I noticed on your user page that you live near Maidstone. Well, I live in Ashford and so I will just mention that you are probably the nearest Wikipedian to me and near the same age. -- Thorpe 22:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, FireFox! I hope you have an enjoyable and relaxing winter break. :) Take care, Sango 123 (talk) 00:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
It seems to have an extraneous white line in it. What happened? Doovinator 04:39, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Wisesabre
-- DPSingh 11:42, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
MERRY CHRISTMAS, 49TL/Archive/December 2005! Hope it's a wonderful one! (happy New Year, too!)-- Violin G irl ♪ 15:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
And a pressy
--
Santa on Sleigh 21:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
--
Thorpe |
talk 11:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year. -- Bhadani 17:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
regarding the unrelated junk (anons chanting Sanskrit battle hymns and the like), may I suggest you run a tight ship and roll it back? It is impossible have a discussion in this hubbub. Thank you for looking after the page, in any case. dab (ᛏ) 14:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry about adding an already blocked user to Administrator Intervention against Vandalism. I'll be sure to check the user's block log from now on; I was simply thrown off because the Willy on Wheels template hadn't been added to the user page, nor had the name been added to the list at Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Willy on Wheels. I've since done both of these things. Let me know if I should post such suspected sockpuppets somewhere else next time, and thanks for your diligent watching of the Admin. intervention page. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 17:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The name that Raja called Suryabandhu was an abuse, so is what DPS has called Raja in his recent post. DPS' addition can easily be deleted, but what would you do with Raja's comments which is repeated more than once. Tintin 17:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
FireFox, We are all watching what action do you take againt user Raja. Also, trolls are vandalizing DPS talk page; even making fun of him now that he can't defend himself. I still have faith in you, but watching warily. -- sisodia 211.226.231.244 21:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Since I can't vote, can I at least ask questions to the possible canidates? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikizach ( talk • contribs) 12:56, 27 December 2005
Hey just dropping by to say hi... its really great work you are doing on the Rajput article. So you live at Maidstone.. i've lived at Rochester. Best luck for your GCSEs man! अमेय आरयन AMbroodEY 18:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
just to let you know the irc bot computer2 has gone belly up ;-) Benon 19:13, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
this is a test -- Doc ask? 21:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey, you're an admin I know :) There's a big and nasty backlog at WP:RM, do you think you could find an admin to take care of it? Ashibaka tock 21:49, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
For the reminder of my birth anniversary. ℬastique▼ parℓer♥ voir♑ 15:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
On Wikipedia:WikiProject Userboxes/Delete requests you listed a couple of entries as "Not redundant". Although their "What links here" did show one or two entries, they were actually already fixed. The "What links here" is a little dodgey, to get rid of the entries they needed a blank save (null edit, where you save a page without changing it). -- Commander Keane 22:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
You have been awarded these balloons for no apperant reason. -- Cool Cat Talk| @ 13:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
I have researched and edited before on Wikipedia not using a username. I have had a lot of expierence with computers, and that helps with these kinds of programs. I also get this stuff much faster than many others. So my awnser is no, but I have used this site many times before.
Wikizach 16:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
When voting on WP:FAC and supporting articles please remember to include a reason for your vote. Just saying 'Support' will probably mean your vote will be discounted or ignored when the final decision is made on wether an article becomes featured or not. Thanks! — Wackymacs 16:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Thats what we all get for me trying to be friendly and warning people about 3rr instead of just reporting it. :( -- Syrthiss 19:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I owe you one.
JHMM13 (
T |
C)
21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
This page is about the Rajput people - the valiant people of the region which today is called Rajasthan, who gained their popularity and respect, because of their bravery, opposition to invaders and upholding of Dharma. The discussion on whether only these people are Kshatriyas or whether the space can be shared with other fighter communities of Hindu fold like Yadavs, Jats, Gurjars etc. is of religious domain. Here, we should consider only Hindu Rajput community, as commonly understood, and leave out other people.
Discussion of Rajputs as a 'race' or 'tribe' etc. is futile. There is no scholarly agreed view on the descent of the these people. It is assumed that they were feudatories of Gurjara-Prathihara kingdom, and started on their own upon the disintegration of the kingdom. Their great saga begins only in mid-late first millenium CE and their military accomplishments have been covered in detail.
I understand that there might be some Mohamedans today, who were once Rajput, but post-conversion they are just Mohamedans. They've lost their caste on account of their failure to defend the dharma and capitulating in front of the enemy (Sufi conversion and other tales, notwithstanding). Even if we skip the religious angle, the argument of Muslim Rajput does not have any credibility from practical POV also. The children born to converts were not known as Rajputs but as Muslims. People who insist on putting Mohamedans in this space should provide reference of some great king, feudatory etc. who went about as Rajput even after conversion. Going by the slippery logic, even Jehangir would be Rajput, since he was born to Rajput mother. But, History as told by Mughal chroniclers, records him as only Turk (or Tork, as it goes in Persian).
My request to you is not to allow this page to be vandalized by these people. Especially, when now there is a Wiki page on Muslim Rajputs ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Rajputs). People are welcome to post their blinkered History there.
Hoping for justice :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indologist ( talk • contribs)
Dear Firefox,
Thanks for your encouraging welcome message and kind words! I'm still new to the forum, still finding my way around :-) I would like to apologise for the oversight of not signing my name, will take care next time. I just saw the arbitration issue and jumped to the conclusion that there is a jury oput there to decide the Historicity of Muslim claims to Rajputhood, and more importantly, whether such claims will be entertained on the page. I believe, you are looking at the dispute in some other capacity, so please ignore my earlier comment. I have no intention of influencing you, one way or the other :-)
Anyways, nice interacting with you. Take care!
indologist 11:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC) Indologist
Dont' RV User Talk pages, it is against the rules. Battlefield 16:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Looks like they will make any Tom, Dick or Firefox an admin these days....Read the rulez Holmes!
Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators
Battlefield 17:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi FireFox. I was just going to ask if you could block:
The_Jiggler ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
for me as he is a sockpuppet of a vandal that has been vandalizing all day and yesterday at my talk page and Chadbryant's user page. — Moe ε 17:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
First, let me congratulate you on becaoming a member of the new Advisory Council. I would like to arrange a meeting with the Advisory Council in IRC either on Saturday or Sunday and wondered when it would be possible (taking time zones into account). Please could you respond on my talk page as soon as possible. Thank you. -- Cel e stianpower háblame 20:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in the Esperanza Election. I was unsuccessful in the end of the election but I would like to thank you for having confidence in me to be a future admin general/ advisory council member. — Moe ε 23:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Here you go:
Main (articles): 1975
Article talk: 137
User: 1144
User talk: 2917
Project: 640
Project talk: 42
Image: 13
Image talk: 1
MediaWiki talk: 3
Template: 20
Help: 5
Category: 129
Portal: 1
Overall statistics: Total edits: 7032
Minor edits: 2184
Percentage of minor edits: 31%
Tito xd( ?!? - help us) 23:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for voting for me in the Esperanza elections. I've been appointed to the Advisory Committee, thanks to your show of confidence in me. I'll do my best to make you proud, but please feel free to ask me for help at any time or to give me tips as to what you would like to do. Thanks for being an active member of Esperanza! I'll see you around. Tito xd( ?!? - help us) 00:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
_... o_.-"` `\ .--. _ `'-._.-'""-; _ .' \`_\_ {_.-a"a-} _ / \ _/ .-' '. {c-._o_.){\|` | (@`-._ / \{ ^ } \\ _/ `~\ '-._ /'. } \} .-. |>:< '-.__/ '._,} \_/ / ()) | >:< `'---. ____'-.|(`"` \ >:< \\_\\_\ | ; \ \\-{}-\/ \ \ '._\\' /) '. /( `-._ _____ _ _____ __.'\ \ / \ / \ / \ \ \ _.'/^\'._.'/^\'._.'/^\'.__) \ ,==' `---` '---' '---' ) ` S a n t a o n S l e i g h ` ` " " " " " " " " " " " " `
-- Santa on Sleigh II 00:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
I look forward to working with you on the advisory council! karmafist 00:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello 49TL/Archive/December 2005,
I wish to thank you for your vote on my RfA. It has passed with a final tally of 59/0/0. If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! KnowledgeOf Self | talk 04:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)uhh sorry to disturbe you again FireFox but could you block another....
StefanDam ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
— Moe ε 06:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Congratulations, and you're very welcome! I'm sure you'll do a fine job. -- King of All the Franks 15:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Congratulations on being elected on esperanza advisory committee! Since I am now a member I thought I should congratulate our small government for being elected. :) -- a.n.o.n.y.m t 18:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi ,when you use AWB can you make sure you check every edit, as I dont think you meant to make this edit. thanks Martin 16:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Please don't use a bot to remove spaces from heading wikitext; eg don't change "== AWB ==" to "==AWB==". The former form is much more readable for editors; there is no reason to expend resources making this change. — Michael Z. 2005-12-31 19:30 Z
It only does that on "see also" and "external links" sections, as it makes it easier to fix other minor problems in these sections, I'll make it so it doesnt do that soon. thanks Martin 11:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)