This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 28 sections are present. |
I've mentioned you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Workshop#28bytes_already_admonished_Delicious_carbuncle_for_leaking_the_Email. -- Michaeldsuarez ( talk) 17:47, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikihounding |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I see you archived here without answering my question. Your rationale seems to imply that Demiurge's baits and insults should be overlooked, and yet you fail to give credence to fact that baiting, as per the recent arbcom case, is as uncivil as any incivility it causes. I've not been incivil, and I am insulted. Demiurge told me multiple times I was a liar, made fun of my user name, was condescending, and seemed to imply what? That according to ScottyWong's tool I'm a meatpuppet or something? From where I'm sitting none of this behavior is acceptable. Yet no one dropped him word on his user page about it. Can you please explain why not? I'm very curious about the rationale behind this. Thanks. Truthkeeper ( talk) 12:10, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Wikihounding, a dull history continues |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
After reading up on policy a little more, I discovered that the first part of this was not just your opinion, but was also, technically speaking, correct as per the definition of WP:WHEELWAR. I was distracted from paying more attention to such details because I was dealing with a rather more important WP-related matter at the same time as all that nonsense. The rest of your suggestion, I did manage to follow. Also technically speaking, your close here was materially incorrect. After Nikkimaria succeeded in gaining consensus for a 2-week block by arbitrarily reducing the block to 9 days, she did not then increase the block to 2 weeks, as you stated in your close, but instead changed it to 13 days. Assuming good faith, we could suppose that was merely a careless mistake. After being informed of it on her talk page, she has declined to correct it to follow consensus. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 12:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
|
If Demiurge1000 posts more insults towards me, would you please alert me.
Thanks, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 21:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome. -- Michaeldsuarez ( talk) 11:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I don´t know for sure if this is the right way this messge can get to ya. I´m a little bit lost up here, first time I found a way to communicate with someone through Wikipedia.org. My issue is next and I hope you can help me or advice me which other user in the game portal might help. I´m in a dilemma in choosin´ which video card is better (HD 5770 v.s GTX 550Ti) and (HD 6850 v.s GTX 560)...for general purposes like gaming(Battlefield 3, Alan Wake, Assassin´s Creed: Ravelations) and 3D design programs (SketchUp, Artlantis, Archicad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.13 ( talk) 21:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Can you delete File:Ariesurania.jpg on en wiki? It's clearly PD and was tagged for move to Commons and I did so and tagged the en copy with nowcommons. I came across this while reviewing Keilana's Aries FAC. I'll improve the formatting on the commons copy now. PumpkinSky talk 21:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice...need more info...would ya tell of someone else who really, really is stuck in the matter and in fact works with this type of hardware? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcap0000 ( talk • contribs) 01:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
So, just how did Merridew manage to get permission to edit again and then go right for an editor's jugular?
As regards our reaction to vandals and other useless editors, the thing is, "taunting" may give thm an excuse to vandalize, but a lack of "taunting" won't stop them, either. Mindful of that problem, though, when I revert a drive-by's vandalism, I usually say almost nothing. I just wait to see if he does it again. If not, fine. If so, then I issue a warning. It seldom does any good, but it least it lays some groundwork for sending them to the phantom zone eventually. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 05:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
FYI, I'd previously closed this thread and left Dave a note ( diff), but the closure was reverted by one of the editors involved in the discussion ( diff), who didn't have the courtesy to note that in the thread, much less explain their action. I agree with your closure (which is much sterner than mine!), but its unfortunate that we doubled up like this. Regards, Nick-D ( talk) 07:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
What part of "quit poking at each other" did y'all not understand? 28bytes ( talk) 00:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
There was nothing strange about reverting the closure. A participant in the discussion went and canvassed another editor contrary to our canvass guideline; the least inflammatory way of addressing it seemed to be to revert the closing with an explanatory edit summary, including a diff of the canvassing. As your closure of the incident was vastly superior to the previous one, the situation is improved. Unfortunately the saga may be continuing Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance#Using names of Editors while giving Barnstars. Nobody Ent 14:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
I ignored the Run to Mommy thread, but didn't ignore this one. And Bugs really should stop the mocking plays on user names. ;) Br'er Rabbit ( talk) 16:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)