Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome! ~
Junior5a
(Talk)
Cont 03:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Just saw you add a vandalism tag on an IP users page. Just out of interest, why is it that you don't have and account? Uamaol ( talk) 23:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
I replied on my talk. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 23:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Gluons12 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Thanks for removing vandalism on my Talk page. I greatly appreciate it.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 00:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
What are you doing? User talk:Yoyostorm23 had already been reverted and warned, and had made no new edits after the warning, so why did you give the account a final warning? It's not your place to come along and leave extra warnings ten minutes after he has already been reverted and warned. Stop doing this. Meters ( talk) 01:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
And here's something else you should never do: [1] Overwriting someone else's vandalism report with yours. You replaced the IP that another editor had listed at AIV with one you wanted to report, and left it looking like the other editor had made your report. If you don't know how to make an AIV report then I suggest that you don't use the board until you have more experience. Meters ( talk) 01:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I am at a loss to figure out how/why your report to AIV was apparently deleted by me here. It was a good report and I have changed my password just in case my account may have been compromised. Apologies, Aloha27 talk 23:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. When I reverted you, I provided an explanation. You chose not to extend me the same courtesy. Why? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 00:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I know why you posted a note and I understand why you did it, I have nothing against you for doing that. It's just that I'm not sure what to do with this user, they don't listen to anything I say, I called for protection for the affected page but they managed to slip through the crack and make their edits despite being protected, they were subsequently reverted but I know they will be back to make those same edits again, which include removing sources, names of countries and calling me a racist. Aren't removing sources and information vandalism? ( 101.160.170.49 ( talk) 02:46, 18 October 2016 (UTC))
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Keep up the good work! Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 03:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
You seem to be doing great with anti-vandalism, and I have a great suggestion for you: Twinke. It's a program to help you automatically revert vandalism, and warn/report vandals. However, in order to use it, you need to make an account. All you need is a pseudonym and password.
Red
Panda
25 20:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism about the editor "Spike2960". You were, of course, perfectly right, and I have blocked the account. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 12:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Please register an account; it makes checking edits like this one much easier! Have a nice day and thanks in advance, ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 23:12, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for this revert, much appreciated. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:57 on October 23, 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 2601:1C0:4401:F360:E136:8F9E:9ACF:27BB. In the future, please refrain from editing others' talk page comments without their permission, as you did here. I have not reverted your edits because I am fine with it being a cautionary note rather than a warning. Please take a look at WP:TPO to avoid any future problems, thank you! — Skyllfully ( talk | contribs) 00:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I see that you often mark your edit summaries "rvv". But many of these do not seem to be vandalism at all, but rather a good faith mistake. It is very important that editors here assume that others' mistakes are made in good faith. Instead of "rvv", how about "reverted unreferenced addition", or "reverted error". Then, I saw you give a very, very harsh level 3 warning to a person who had merely noted that a new version of an album was available at Sia Furler. Don't worry, I replaced it with a kinder level 2 warning. Please be more careful. Such a harsh warning could discourage a promising new editor from participating in the Wikipedia project. All the best, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. In this edit you said you were withdrawing reports, yet you left a report for 203.100.6.222 there, while removing the comment from User:Jayron32 declining the report. This has the appearance of admin shopping, as you seem to be aware that there are some admins that will block school IPs more aggressively than other admins will. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 02:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
I appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism here. I do wish you would register an account, but that's not a requirement of course. The guidance at Wikipedia:IPBLENGTH provides little to guide us when it comes to school IPs, and this might be worth a wider discussion at WT:AIV or at Wikipedia talk:Blocking IP addresses, maybe building on the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Blocking IP addresses#IP block length or other times this might have been brought up. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
From one 2601 to another, cheers. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Donner60 ( talk) 02:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. I think I reverted his latest blanking and that no previous blankings had removed any active reports. Unfortunately, I think he will keep popping up at AIV or elsewhere until he is blocked. Donner60 ( talk) 03:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks! Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:46, 30 October 2016 (UTC) |
Hello,
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia talk pages belonging to public IP addresses, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:27.99.68.124&oldid=746890541&diff=cur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and target random members of the public who do not edit Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 27.99.68.124 ( talk) 16:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |