![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hi, I have removed the PROD tag you placed on DDRUK, as it has been kept at AfD twice and therefore cannot be nominated for PROD. I have no opinion one way or the other on the merits of deletion, but if you still wish to pursue deletion please feel free to open another AfD. — KuyaBriBri Talk 14:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have also removed the prod tag you placed on You Are Under Surveillance, as it was prodded back in 2006 ( [1]). Again I have no objection to taking it to AfD. — KuyaBriBri Talk 03:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 19:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Reb1981. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Amazon.com without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please discuss in talk page before remove such a large amount of cited material.
Reb1981 (
talk) 00:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Power~enwiki. Sorry for the late reply. There was indeed a recent proposal to remove the presidents. Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Expanded/Archive_51 contains the most recent proposals to add, remove and swap from the list in the last month or two. Thanks for joining the vital articles project. It is always good to get a new perspective on vitality even if nobody agrees 100% of the time. :) Gizza ( t)( c) 23:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:APPNOTE I am drawing attention to two current AfD discussions regarding YouTube:
Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 12:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I am waiting for the final report, or at least an initial report
Not how things are done around here. But I suspect you knew that.
I would also note the repeated warnings about revert wars on that page.
So you're not gonna touch it again? Cool. -- Calton | Talk 05:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Just fyi, iVotes at AfD only become useful when they include an explanation of why an editor thinks that topic should be kept or deleted. And they are most persuasive if they cite a policy-based reason for keeping or deleting. Cheers. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for contributing to the Third Opinion dispute resolution process. Please remember however in future to indicate which disputes you're removing and how many disputes remain afterwards in your edit summary. More details can be found at: ' Providing Third Opinions' on the Third Opinion page. Thanks! -=Troop=- ( talk) 19:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Godsy's minor edits are not the issue, it's the long term aggressive harassment and hounding behavior. We all specialize to some extent. There are thousands of active editors doing minor edits, categorization and so on in mainspace, but very few cleaning up spam in userspace. I often work here [2] and its a triage job. There is no requirement for any editor to do everything possible to better an article and I've found that articles promoted into the NPP cue get tagged and cleaned up pretty quickly by editors that specialize in that. I also watch and revisit these pages in the days to follow to ensure they get required attention. Also, respectfully, Pacific Premier Bancorp is a NASDAQ listed $6 Billion in assets bank, and nearly all listed companies meet WP:N Legacypac ( talk) 04:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.-- NeilN talk to me 12:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Removing on-their-face credible sources from articles in AfD is discouraged
...as is citing to a book as a whole, making a single cite of two cobbled-together URLs, using cites which are quite likely copyright violations in the long term, and leaving a simple reversion tag when substantially editing a page. All of those are discouraged, I'd say; I'm curious why you'd support them. Anmccaff ( talk) 21:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subuey ( talk • contribs) 05:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Discussions should be closed by uninvolved editors. I've reverted your closure here, which was improper. See Wikipedia:Closing_discussions#Closure_procedure. James J. Lambden ( talk) 05:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I really hate that page, I don't know why I do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subuey ( talk • contribs) 05:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me out on my talk page! Costatitanica ( talk) 18:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Power, thanks for acknowledging my hours upon hours of research that brought the page Whataboutism to over 100 sources on the article.
I really appreciate your acknowledgement of my extensive research on this topic.
Thank you !
Sagecandor (
talk) 03:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
That section came from Presidency of Donald Trump, and was stated by someone else. I just expanded based on the Wikipedia consensus, although I don't consider Trump one.
PerfectlyIrrational ( talk) 21:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
As you know, this means the pre-edit-warring status should be restored. Please undo your revert. The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
FYI I removed the PROD. It's a famous tearoom. Established in 1893. It is also a very well-known tourist attraction in Rome, which is why I had no trouble adding six sources. 104.163.153.14 ( talk) 04:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Please do tell me why you think my edits are disruptive. I have checked what your contributions were to those articles, and they are to delete some very useful information in the mathematics section. Tell me why you think that information is "irrelevant", because in my mathematics department, checking the mathematical properties of a number on Wikipedia is commonplace. Thank you. Johnny3887 ( talk) 03:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions on the Afd page. Any ideas how to recreate the Omero article to reflect the base in knowledge she brings to Sunday morning TV? I would be happy to research, cite, and write about that. MaynardClark ( talk) 20:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
As you participated in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive957#Proposal: One-way IBAN on Godsy towards Legacypac, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposing IBAN between Godsy and Legacypac. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 03:14, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
"no independent claim of notability"? You don't think a whole section of The Cambridge History of English and American Literature is indepndent enough? (See the Further Reading). Pam D 22:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
A user posted a comment for you there. North America 1000 03:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi - Talk:2017 Qatar diplomatic crisis - please open a chat if you want to change the archive time for stale discussions to one year, such a change is imho ridiculous, as you have tried to do that and been reverted, please seek a consensus on the talkpage for your changes, thanks Govindaharihari ( talk) 21:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello Power~enwiki. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Alex Shih Talk 00:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Is entirely self-promotional (unsigned comment from IP 2602:306:3485:e0f0:c1c0:b5ad:c9fd:35d4 )
But first person quotes about obscure court cases from over ten years ago are ok?
If someone wants to clean up that page and restore even a nominal amount of objectivity I would happily step away. It is obvious that the page is being written by either Mr Drury himself or someone in his office in order to create a favorable impression of him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3485:E0F0:C1C0:B5AD:C9FD:35D4 ( talk) 04:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kindly show me where it says I'm only allowed to post in my own section, and if I don't, you're allowed to remove my edit. If you can't do both of those things restore my edit to where it was. No More Mr Nice Guy ( talk) 03:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
@ No More Mr Nice Guy: You are only allowed to post in your own section. It says so at the top of the page.
And Power-enwiki, maintaining decorum at arbitration enforcement is the responsibility of the administrators working there, not yours.
Both of you: Don't disrupt the AE board. Doing so can be a short trip to a long block. GoldenRing ( talk) 08:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you added 'main article' templates to most subheadings of the article entertainment - ( diff). I appreciate what you're trying to achieve with that contribution, but I feel that there is now quite a lot of repetition in the lead of each subheading. For example, this is what the "Games" subsection looks like:
=== Games ===
Main article: [[Game]]
[[Game|Games]] are played for entertainment...
In effect, we have the same word repeated thrice - and this is the case for most of the others (banquests, music, comedy, circus, parades etc. etc.) Perhaps the only one that is different is "children" where the main-article is "play (activity)", although that is also linked in the first sentence of that section.
What I'm trying to say is that I'm not sure these new templates add information to the reader given that their linked article is the immediately following word (like Games) or in a couple of cases just a few words later (like, "Dance: The many forms of
dance..."). At the very least if we keep these 'main article' templates we should remove the links in the first word of the prose for that paragraph, or perhaps remove the templates to return it to how it was when approved for Good Article? Your thoughts?
Witty
lama 09:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I was leaving neutrally worded notices, specifically only using the {{ Afd notice}} template, on WikiProject talk pages.
Zero user talk pages. Sagecandor ( talk) 21:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You stated that asking for four admins is canvassing. If that's it, may I modify my post and then request just the third closer instead? If that's not it, why saying "canvassing"? -- George Ho ( talk) 16:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps canvassing isn't the right word. My point stands that it's ridiculous that you should need additional admins to close the RfC. If you are trying to do so because the WMF feels it will be helpful, I will gladly argue with them about it. If you feel on your own that it is helpful, I will gladly argue with you about it. Power~enwiki ( talk) 22:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
@ Guy Macon: I can close this and move my comments to your talk page, if you prefer. Power~enwiki ( talk) 22:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I think if there's going to be a section on DevOps maybe go over the industry evolution of how typically IT Operations (ops) was considered separate from Engineering (devs) and now DevOps emphasizes the need for closer collaboration. Otherwise I think the wiki page stands on it's own without reference to DevOps. Or in other words, I'm thinking: "the structure of Wikipedia page don't have to mirror a particular view of how businesses should be structured". Anyway, just thoughts I'm not married to.
Sp00nfeeder —Preceding undated comment added 14:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
You're somewhat right, in that talk page is different than main article space.
But about WP:No original research, I think, unfortunately, you are confused about that policy on Wikipedia.
It means we can't do our own research.
It means we can't make up our own assumptions and then put that in Wikipedia article mainspace.
Hope the above is helpful to you. Sagecandor ( talk) 03:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello User:Power~enwiki, I apologize for the revert here. I was scrolling through my watchlist and accidentally clicked 'rollback'! Cheers, Anupam Talk 06:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Power,
Can you please stop following me to pages unrelated to previous areas of interaction, as you did, at DIFF ?
Thank you for respecting this request,
Sagecandor ( talk) 05:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hidden Tempo (
talk) 07:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:47, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Power~enwiki, you removed inner source from the Software Development Process template. I am not sure why you did it. Would please explain your decision? I think the open source software development process is completely different from all other processes. And so it is inner source, which is the use of open source best practices.
And you removed the inner source benefits from the inner source article. The benefits are reported in scientific articles, published in reputable journals and conferences, such as ACM or IEEE (see references). So why do you want to have this scientific results removed from the wikipedia page? There is no advertising the benefits, because I did also mention the challenges. I also do not think it makes sense to add the info box about software development process to this article, when you want to have inner source on this template (see above). What do you think?
Michaeldorner ( talk) 12:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I've written a new lede section for Newspaper. Any comments are requested. The old one is in the "overview" section. Power~enwiki ( talk) 00:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Would be great to have your contribution to the DRN, since you've been very civil and collaborative on other pages. Hidden Tempo ( talk) 01:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Behavioral disputes belong at ANI or AE, or you can ping an uninvolved Admin. SPECIFICO talk 02:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Just a note, Power (and feel free to ignore), but it may be helpful to provide some further background of O-3000's persistent uncivil behavior and disruptions. At the NPOV noticeboard for instance, he repeatedly tried to derail the discussion and demanded its closure. I know it doesn't concern you per se, but at AN/I you really want to make sure you have a strong case to make sure you don't get boomerang'd. If an admin requests or is open to it, I can add a statement as well since I have had numerous unpleasant interactions with this editor and this isn't his first time heading to AN/I for poor behavior. Thanks. Hidden Tempo ( talk) 03:05, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Any further attempts to post on my talk page may result in you being blocked. I intend this to be the last post I make on your talk page. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 16:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
You just reported an IP to AIV---could you report it again? There is an edit war going on there, and I accidentally reverted you. Thanks! RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 00:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Heh, they actually used my IP address geolocation to threaten me after I reverted them... what a joke... 2601:1C0:10B:7D6D:19FC:80A1:3B49:6D26 ( talk) 00:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen. Power~enwiki ( talk) 01:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The article Previous has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There's no reason to have this Wiktionary redirect here. The redirection tag was added by someone who moved the previous content to another title, but there's no reason to keep this title.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Largoplazo (
talk) 02:28, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Hey, Power. Did you want to discuss your reversion a bit? The critical piece of information that you reverted is necessary to maintain NPOV on that article. Without it, the narrative to the reader is basically "Listen. Trump fired Comey cause of Russia. It was about Russia." Do you feel that Comey's bombshell testimony is not just as relevant as the allegation that Trump asked Comey to let the Flynn investigation go? Hidden Tempo ( talk) 21:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Since many people (mainly Democrats and certain media outlets) immediately began speculating that Trump was trying to get rid of the Russia investigation and "protect" himself, it's highly relevant that James Comey refuted that speculation and very directly said that this wasn't the case. Hidden Tempo ( talk) 22:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)"I had understood the President to be requesting that we drop any investigation of Flynn in connection with false statements about his conversations with the Russian ambassador in December. I did not understand the President to be talking about the broader investigation into Russia or possible links to his campaign."
This kitten defies your instructions not to post him and appreciates your Cogman input
‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia
ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
I think the page needs to be locked temporarily, it's just becoming a hotbed for IP vandalism now CaribbeanTruth ( talk) 15:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Please, do not use html code in a latex environment. It will produce errors. I fixed it [3]. -- Boehm ( talk) 09:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
We don't always agree, but I always appreciate your desire to work towards the ideals of Wikipedia. For that, you get this barnstar. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC) |
More editors/authors would be useful on the Government article. Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I am Matthew Tee Kai Woon's personal assistant from Bina Puri Holdings Bhd. The profile i posted on wiki is actually a standard corporate profile and is drafted by me. You may check all the corporate websites linked under references. There isn't any plagiarism in this case. I have also created another page for my Group Managing Director Tee Hock Seng, his profile posted by me is also more or less the same as our corporate website. Should you need any clarification/details from Bina Puri Holdings Bhd, do let me know. Thanks. ( Chucarmen.bp ( talk) 04:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC))
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Instead of arguing that there were references, you went out and found some. You are a hero.. Rhadow ( talk) 01:30, 3 September 2017 (UTC) |
I actually agree with your point in principal, but I can also picture what some of the people on that page are going to do with your post, in particular the word "compromise". I also agree with your closing comment on the reliable sources notice board. Thanks for your contribution. Edaham ( talk) 03:44, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
The other day I overheard some of my friends saying that they paid as much as $275 CAD for a pair of shoes. This is an outrageous price. Nike and other shoe companies have tens of millions of dollars, truckloads of money are paid out in "endorsement deals". In the Global South, people can't even afford shoes. The story doesn't add up.
And also: why is the foundation hiding Jimbo Wales' shoe size? This demonstrates a lack of transparency and general malaise of character that doesn't meet the impossibly-high standards that I and many other contributors hold the foundation to. Perhaps members of the foundation should consider primarily wearing sandals, a more transparent type of shoe.
I, for one, am willing to state on the record that I am extremely concerned by these developments and wish for them to be discussed further at the correct forum.
</sarcasm> Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Not suggesting anything. Awaiting coroner's report and trial outcomes. See WP:BLPCRIME, can't simply make declarations like that while investigation is in process.
It seems probable, sure, but we need to be neutral here. ScratchMarshall ( talk) 23:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
I've removed this page from my Watchlist, and do not intend to edit it on 16 August 2017 UTC. Power~enwiki ( talk) 23:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello Power~enwiki, while that is not the formal way to close a merge proposal, I have redirected the article to your suggested target without any merging (really no sourced content to merge). I hope that's OK for you - of course any future sourced content can be added to Comparison of Kanban software or a stand-alone product article. Just a short notice to avoid misunderstandings :), thank you for your suggestion to get this improvement going. GermanJoe ( talk) 03:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
Simply stating "I disagree" in a summary and requesting to talk without having first created a conversation on the particular rings hollow.
You created a section about the fatality count, but you did not create one to express your disagreement with the section titling.
I explained my reasons in my summary and you did not explain yours. It shows a lack of good faith. ScratchMarshall ( talk) 16:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Did you read WP:Edit warring before you closed the thread? Do you agree that it states that the talk page is the place for discussion? Unscintillating ( talk) 19:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I removed the deletion tag because you left a message in my talk to do so and then justify why. This is my first time editing- just a bit confused?
What specifically can I fix in the article? Because someone shared an article with me about Wikipedia trying to expand it's pages about women so I thought I'd start there.
Thanks, Jacobbailer ( talk) 22:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This is a brand new page, only a few hours old. Please give Wikipedians a chance to improve this article before flagging it as inadequate.
I have added a paragraph pointing out that KW Linuxfest is the only remaining GNU/Linux conference in Ontario, while Wikipedia continues to maintain pages for defunct conferences. --Bob ( talk) 02:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
I have contested the deletion. Please see talk page speednat ( talk)
Hello. Regarding your proposal for deletion of the article Uruk GNU/Linux, I've deleted the proposal and explained in the talk page why I did so. I do believe that Uruk GNU/Linux is used widely enough to have an article on wikipedia, and it feels weird to find certain articles and videos in different langauges but no Wikipedia article about it! Mustafa Wahhudi ( talk) 13:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Lua error in mw.wikibase.entity.lua at line 34: The entity data must be a table obtained via mw.wikibase.getEntityObject
. This problem happens on pages with a
Lua module that use Wikidata. This has now been fixed and no new pages will get this problem. You still need to fix pages that were broken before and still show the error message. You can see how
on this page.
[7]Changes later this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Robert McClenon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Prionus laticollis, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Not misclick, it was a misread, I seem to have missed your signature when I was cleaning up after the sock that posted right after you. Apologies for the trouble. — Spaceman Spiff 23:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
G'day, just letting you know I upgraded your WP:PROD to a WP:AfD at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Guild_Home_Video_and_Pathé_releases. — IVORK Discuss 23:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I am so frustrated that AfD discussions get so little contributions, that they can become dominated by people who have not reviewed the sources, and have the audacity to attack others because they have failed to even put forth the minimum of review of a subject. I am also amazed that people could even think that short mention in a local paper article on a protest could make anyone notable. The whole process is hard to deal with, especially the false claims that I had violated the limitations put on me, which very clearly say once per 24-hours, which I had not come close to violating. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Kaiser San Francisco, maybe we should move it to San Francisco Medical Center but we should keep much as we do with articles on other individual hospitals such as Richmond Medical Center or other kaiser hospitals on the KP template. Wikigirl97 ( talk) 22:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Meetings
#wikimedia-office
on
Freenode. You can use the
web chat.
[15]Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim O'Shaughnessy (businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim O'Shaughnessy (businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder ( talk) 21:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
[16]. To you it may be waste of time (why exactly?). To me, and others who have commented it's not. Don't. Let the matter be resolved. Volunteer Marek 21:55, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apple & Onion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple & Onion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.-- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 03:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Did you receive the ping for a merger discussion? I forgot to sign my username before I saved the edit and I am unsure if that affected the ping. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 02:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)