Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Meir Kahane, you may be
blocked from editing.
Please
do not attack other editors, as you did here:
User talk:Vicky Ng. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Ijtihad, you may be
blocked from editing. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.237.250.25 (
talk) 14:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Meir Kahane. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Magog the Ogre (
talk) 22:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
♠ TomasBat 20:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The Judean Mountains range in both Israel and Palestine. The contributing photographer, however, specified this one is in Israel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lupinus_pilosus_1.JPG That is why I reverted and am reverting again. We can ask an administrator to cast final judgement if you disagree. MartinezMD ( talk) 03:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. There are several issues here. If your only concern is including the Arabic name, then you should only edit that aspect of the article -- blanket reverts (reverting both things you disagree with and anything else that has been changed in the meantime) are not productive. What's more, all edits should include an edit summary explaining the rationale for the edit. As for the particular issue here, the Arabic name is discussed in the article Greater Syria, and mentioned in the lead as "the historic area called Syria, Greater Syria, or the Bilad al-Sham". Thanks, -- Macrakis ( talk) 15:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Meir Kahane. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
كيف الحال؟ If I may be so presumptuous as to offer a bit of advice. Do not get in to personal discussion at AN/I. There are users who mindlessly interject with some inane comment that they think is either incredibly clever or stunningly hilarious. Those comments are often best ignored. nableezy - 01:12, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Another bit of presumptuous advice: on your user page you have several quotations taken from other users' user pages. It is good practice to acknowledge where you got them from, firstly because technically Wikipedia's copyright licence requires it, and secondly because it's just good manners to thank people who've helped you. You could do this between <small> ... </small> tags. -- NSH001 ( talk) 02:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Please note that your userpage appears to be in contravention of WP:USERPAGE. Specifically, WP:UPNOT states that userpages should not include substantial content unrelated to Wikipedia. The guideline goes on to state that this includes, but is not limited to:
You appear to be using your userpage to host a substantial list of quotes to make a political point about the Middle East conflict, which is not what Wikipedia is for. Please consider removing the content in question. Singularity42 ( talk) 03:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
اهلان يا عمرو بن كلثوم, regarding Singularity42's message above,
WP:USERPAGE does allow a limited amount of material stating a user's political opinion, and there are plenty of user pages which state such opinions and are allowed, not least those pages from which you have drawn some of your quotations. So in principle, I would support your right to keep your user page. There is one very important proviso, however, and that concerns the very first section of your page, headed "Master Race and Chosen People", because it is anti-Semitic. Any statement of the form "all Jews are <some unfavourable description>" is, in my view, anti-Semitic (as well as being untrue and a logical fallacy). The fact that you have taken these alleged quotations from Jews does not negate their anti-Semitic nature. You then draw all these alleged quotations together into a single section, so as to emphasise the same unfavourable impression about all Jews. Fortunately there are many Jews who oppose Zionism, not least
User:RolandR here on Wikipedia. If you remove this section from your user page, then I will happily support your right to keep the rest of it. --
NSH001 (
talk) 11:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
User:عمرو بن كلثوم, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:عمرو بن كلثوم and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:عمرو بن كلثوم during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Singularity42 ( talk) 14:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Damascus Eyalet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saida ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Inside (1996 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — KuyaBriBri Talk 21:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Look to the talk page! Sero1988 16:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
عمرو بن كلثوم ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
No 3 edit violation, just reverted vandalism, like other users on that page. You should have checked page history before taking your decision
Decline reason:
I see several reverts you made on Arabs in Turkey. Edit warring is not permitted on Wikipedia. Changes must be discussed, instead of playing of tug-of-war on an article. TN X Man 17:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your recent editing history at Al-Jazari shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Scopecreep ( talk) 14:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
im gone undo any page you change arabic iq is about 40!! every time they block me im gone use my magic to kick your arabic butt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.100.178.69 ( talk) 14:39, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Would you please stop lying?
I am truly hurt by the way you're claiming city's that are, and have always been Kurdish were Arabic. You've got no proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.109.78.28 ( talk) 10:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)