|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello! Did you really think this was a good idea, removing the linked reference to her place of birth? You could at least have linked it in the info box. I am asking you now to do that. Please be more careful, and please (as requested above) leave edit summaries! SergeWoodzing ( talk) 13:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Please do not change any info-box names so that they do not correspond to (1) article names and (2) names as given in article text. If you want such name changes you need to request article moves (renaming). No other way. SergeWoodzing ( talk) 09:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richeza of Poland, Queen of Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helen of Hungary.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Векочел,
Why are you making massive, undiscussed changes, removing religion from Infoboxes where previous editors had added it in? Is there policy regarding this? I was going to revert all of your changes until I saw you were an experienced editor, not a new account, but it seems like you are making changes on a grand scale without discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
@ Векочел Would you mind helping User:CtasACT by going through all the references on the above mentioned article and also ensuring whether they meet Wikipedia's policy or not. The GA review is taking place at- Talk:Haile Selassie/GA2. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help. Regards MSincccc ( talk) 13:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop doing this! Nobility and royalty are not the same thing. I would think you knew that before going about all those faulty changes?! SergeWoodzing ( talk) 19:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
You are doing a lot of damage with changes like this. Unless you go back and fix those articles, we are heading for serious trouble. It is far more relevant that these people are the children of monarchs than any other less relevant titles. SergeWoodzing ( talk) 19:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
For the most part, I think the categories are, at least in theory, supposed to be limited to women who lived to see their children become monarchs. At the very least, that's the philosophy I was using when considering adding them to the category. 98.228.137.44 ( talk) 21:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Children of princesses regnant has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw ( talk) 01:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Your nominations are spurious. Being found disruptive months after creating categories is not a valid reason for deleting them. Please close your nominations immediately. I have commented on the first one, but frankly, a wholesale listing like that is also bordering on the disruptive. ——Serial Number 54129 17:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Sons of princesses regnant indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit 14:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Daughters of princesses regnant indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit 14:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Well caught! That was a truly egregious error... Amazing how long these things can go undetected. Haploidavey ( talk) 12:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove any more images of the Japanese Emperors without establishing a consensus to do so. In many cases there are no contemporary depictions in existance which is akin to Christopher Columbus where a visual is helpful to the reader when it's referenced by historians. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 16:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Tony Blair shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I'm EmilySarah99. Your recent edit(s) to the page Mary II appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mary was heir apparent during her joint reign. If her husband were to die, she would continue reigning as sole monarch. This is stated on the category page. EmilySarah99 ( talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingrid of Sweden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)