State | Marriage | Same-sex unions | Notes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Defined | Result | Civil Unions | Domestic Partnerships | |||||
Constitution | Statute | Licenses | Def. | Status | Def. | Status | ||
Alabama | Yes | Yes | Banned | Yes | Banned | No | None | |
Alaska | Yes | No | Banned | No | None | No | No |
State | Marriage Defined | Same-sex unions | Notes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statute | Constitution | Marriage Licenses | Civil Unions | Domestic Partnerships | ||
Arizona | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Arkansas | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
California | Yes | No | No | Sort of | Yes | Main article:
Same-sex marriage in California
Originally granting only hospital visitation rights, the scope of domestic partnerships was gradually expanded over a three-year period. Taking effect on January 1, 2005, A.B. 205 extended to domestic partnerships virtually all the legal rights and responsibilities of marriage in California. Thus, domestic partnership in California has been effectively transformed into a civil union status. |
Colorado | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Connecticut | Yes | No | No | Yes | Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Connecticut
Does not award marriage licenses to same-sex couples but the civil unions confer "all of the state-level spousal rights and responsibilities." [1] | |
Delaware | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
District of Columbia | No | No | No | No | Yes | Main article:
Domestic partnerships in District of Columbia
Enacted 1992; implemented 2002; expanded 2006 |
Florida | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Georgia | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Hawaii | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Minimal benefits, available to all adults, including relatives; official terminology is reciprocal beneficiary relationship. [1] |
Idaho | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Illinois | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Indiana | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Iowa | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Kansas | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Kentucky | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Louisiana | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Maine | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Main article:
Domestic partnership in Maine
The Maine Domestic Partnership act came into effect on July 30, 2004. [2] |
Maryland | Yes | No | No | No | No | Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Maryland
"The first state law defining marriage as a union between a man and woman was adopted by Maryland in 1973." [2] |
Massachusetts | No | No | Yes | Main article: Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts | ||
Michigan | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Minnesota | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Mississippi | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Missouri | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Montana | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Nebraska | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Nevada | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
New Hampshire | Yes | No | No | No | No | State law pre-dates DOMA. [2] |
New Jersey | Yes | No more but present valid ones allowed | Main article:
Same-sex marriage in New Jersey
The state of New Jersey has neither allowed nor recognized marriages between couples of the same-sex. However, the New Jersey Supreme Court, in Lewis v. Harris, required the New Jersey Legislature to change state law by April 24, 2007 to afford same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexual couples. [3] A bill now allows civil unions that will supersede domestic partnerships. These are no more applied but may remain for the present ones. | |||
New Mexico | No | No | No | No | No | Does not contain any public policy explicitly banning same-sex marriage nor defining marriage as between a man and a woman (effectively making the state neutral). |
New York | No | No | No | No | Main article: Same-sex marriage in New York | |
North Carolina | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
North Dakota | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Ohio | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Oklahoma | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Oregon | No | Yes | No | No | No | Main article: Same-sex unions in Oregon |
Pennsylvania | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Rhode Island | No | No | No | No | No | Does not contain any public policy explicitly banning same-sex marriage nor defining marriage as between a man and a woman (effectively making the state neutral). Does not award marriage licenses, nor provide any form of statewide recognition for same-sex couples but does extend limited rights to same-sex couples. [1] |
South Carolina | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
South Dakota | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Tennessee | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Texas | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Utah | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Vermont | Yes | No | No | Yes | Vermont civil unions provide same-sex couples access to state-level marriage benefits. [2] Parties to a civil union are entitled to all of the state-level spousal rights and responsibilities and only for couples who live in the state of Vermont. [1] | |
Virginia | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Washington | Yes | No | No | No | No | Main article: Same-sex marriage in Washington |
West Virginia | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Wisconsin | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Wyoming | Yes | No | No | No | No | State law pre-dates DOMA. [2] |