Hi FDRMRZUSA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 03:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Williamsburg Union order of battle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages III Corps and IV Corps ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi FDRMRZUSA! Battle of Pea Ridge falls under the scope of WikiProject Military History and their content guide specifies that the section headings for battles refer to the background, the prelude, a description of the battle, and the aftermath. For consistency's sake, I think that the section heading should be simply ¨Background¨, especially considering that the belligerents are listed in the infobox already. Thanks, Thesixthstaff ( talk) 17:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC) reply

I have just reverted your edits to Battle of the Bulge order of battle. There is no need to remove redlinks from articles. They are there to encourage editors to write the missing articles. Hamish59 ( talk) 19:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Please leave edit summaries? Drmies ( talk) 17:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Lookout Mountain may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | casualties1 = '''671''' total<ref>''Return of casualties in the Union forces: XI and XII Corps)'': Official Records, Series I, Volume XXXI, Part 2, [http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

First Battle of Bull Run

added a link pointing to Army of the Shenandoah

Second Battle of Bull Run

added a link pointing to John Pope

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC) reply

My first impulse was to revert but you seem to know about the Civil War. I know that Battle of Mobile Bay is listed in the Western Theater category but how is Alabama in the Western Theatre? Slight Smile 17:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Okay I see it. btw You should make an effort to reply to your talk page messages. This is a community effort - you're not alone here. Slight Smile 18:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hey, as you most likely already know lots of your stuff gets removed from various Orders of Battle by Kitt1987 as he is extremely strict regarding unsourced content. I´m seldomly posting anything in this domain without sources because of that anymore and mostly limit myself to wikification and corrections. Just a reminder for you to include sources, otherwise it doubles your work and can be rather frustrating. Please keep up your contributions, they´re appreciated at least by some of us. .... GELongstreet ( talk) 07:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Savannah Campaign Union order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cavalry Corps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as First Battle of Bull Run. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, FDRMRZUSA. I saw your recent edits such as this one and I must say I don't get what you're trying to do here. Adding this general section doesn't really seem right for those battle articles, and the formatting is sort of nonstandard. Would you please explain what the intent of these edits is? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I'm equally confused by these edits. After more than a month of encountering these non-wiki sections, and no response here, I've moved the link they contain to the "See also" section in all such articles ( example). You can comment here if needed. (Pinging Howicus, just in case.) -- A D Monroe III ( talk) 19:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Many of your recent image insertions have broken the article formatting. You should not insert an image in the middle of a paragraph, because images always produce a paragraph break. And you should certainly not insert an image between text and the citation that supports that text, as you did here [1] [2]. And please don't use fixed pixel sizes for images, as this disregards the reader's image size preference. Use the upright= parameter instead. Kendall-K1 ( talk) 15:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from United States presidential election, 1956 into Dwight D. Eisenhower. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Please do not add books to reference sections unless they are long citations to support short citations ( WP:CITE). If the book is really useful (and not just another edition) then if it meets the requirements of "Further reading" then add it to that section instead.

I also noticed with this edit you removed an attribution template {{ source-attribution}}. Please do not do this (see the section WP:FREECOPYING in the Plagiarism Guideline) -- PBS ( talk) 00:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Do you have a reliable source for this edit? Note that the article already contains similar information based on Bureau of Indian Standards' specification, but if there have been updates that will, of course, be useful addition. Abecedare ( talk) 16:31, 7 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, FDRMRZUSA. I have reverted your various edits to the files of the previous flag of Ethiopia. I have done so because the heraldic lion you used, while a valid option for the coat of arms, does not accurately reflect the lion as was most commonly depicted on the flag. While it'd be wrong for me to say that I have never seen the lion depicted in yellow, the most common color I have seen, by far, is brown. Furthermore, the sinewy, muscular lion as used on the SVG version does not match the more filled-out depiction again most commonly seen. Also, I have never seen the lion depicted roaring on the flag. If you can provide sources to support your choice of depiction, please do share, but otherwise I think it best that the existing depiction be allowed to remain.

Also, thanks for creating a file for the Imperial Standard-- although you've used the Swedish Order of the Seraphim instead of the Order of Solomon!-- Varavour ( talk) 23:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Template:Chronology of military events in the American Civil War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann ( ^{Talk to me}/ _{What I been doing}) 21:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chronology of military events in the American Civil War, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, FDRMRZUSA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Chronology of military events in the American Civil War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot ( talk) 04:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ptolemaic dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ptolemais ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Battle of Gettysburg has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 18:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC) reply