to my off-wiki confederates, who have fed references to me or helped with translations.
Mamelsberg
HrcAK47
TacError
The volunteer fan translators of the
Hololive community
Wisdom
SuperHamster: "I'm proposing a new adage: the longer a response is proportional to the original post, the more ridiculous that response will be. If the response to an 80 word message is 500 words it ain't gonna be good."
Johnbod: "5 refs on a line is almost always a sure sign of trouble."
Tamzin: "The breadth of an
SNG is directly proportional to the relevant topic's prevalence as a special interest among autistic people."
Abraham van Hellsing, Dracula: "We learn from failure, not from success!"
Simón Bolívar: "The art of victory is learned in defeat."
Krisgabwoosh: "I edit by the philosophy that there's no reason to create an article that isn't a good article. I don't believe in stubs or adding new entries that will never be expanded upon. Perhaps this limits my output or my article creation count, etc., but I don't mind. It means that every article I contribute to the encyclopedia merits being included."
===Preamble from Vami===
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. My name is Vami, and I will be your reviewer. During this review I may make small edits such as spelling corrections, but I will only suggest substantive content changes in comments here. For responding to my comments, please use {{Done}}, {{Fixed}}, {{Added}}, {{Not Done}}, {{Doing}}, or {{Removed}}, followed by any comment you'd like to make. As my comments are addressed or rebutted, I will cross them out, and only my comments.<p>My goal as your reviewer is to assess the quality of your work and offer suggestions for its improvement; I want to help you write a truly good article. To this end, I intend to be collaborative and work with a collegial attitude. If I have demonstrated incompetence or caused offense, [[User talk:Vami_IV|please let me know]]. ~~~~
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
for FAC
Source reviewing and spot-checking
;Spotcheck
Rationale for method used
Format:
* All good.
* Ditto
* Does not support... [quotation] (for single-use citation)
* Errors detected, noted below. All other instances good. (for citations used multiple times)
* Complete fabrication.
Committed identity: ac5ed4745743e218e2bb034d7bc7c7260a83946617a55cf4f6e427b8918384f8f155d73bb6e7ed38f72c78c50f1ae796841c1e56109ca7f351085ec31196a0ac is a
SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.