From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fram related content
Location Type Link Shortcut Comments Size (18 June)
Current information
On wiki En WP Community response... (CR) WP:Fram Main page (see also numbered archives and named archives listed below) 693k
WP Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5 152k, 142k, 127k, 200k, 205k
En Talk CR...Talk 237k
WP CR.../Summary WP:FRAMSUM Useful timelines 14k
WP CR.../Proposals Proposals about WMF Office 34k
WP CR.../Fram's response Originally on Commons and copied over 22k
WP CR...Jan Eissfeldt 10k
WP CR.../Community Conduct An essay on civility 11k
En WP AN Several proposals, all closed without action
En WP ANI twitter Brief kerfuffle related to Twitter issue
En WP:VP Proposed 'crat power Proposed, but quickly closed without action
En WP:BN Fram Banned Original notice, subsequently moved to WP:Fram
En WP:BN Desysop BU Rob13 User request–granted
En WP:BN Desysop Floquenbeam Notice of action
En WP:BN Desysop Nick User request–granted
En WP:BN Resysop Floquenbeam User request–granted by WJBscribe (review by ArbCom requested)
En WP:BN Desysop The DJ User request–granted
En U Talk Fram Banned, Board meeting? Two threads on Jimbos talk page
En U Talk Notice to Fram Only the notice at the top of the page is relevant
En WP:Arb Arbcom WJBscribe Self report regarding the resysop of Floquenbeam 168k
En WT:Arb Precipitating edit? Claimed to be the edit which led to the ban
En WT:Arb Request for a comment Request that Arbcom comment on the ban issue
En WP Office actions [1] WP:OA Office actions Policy 46k
Meta Meta Office Actions [1] Office actions Policy (on Meta) 51k
Meta Meta Community health initiative/User reporting system consultation 2019 [2] User reporting system consultation 2019 21K since 13 June 2019
Off wiki Email lists Wikipedia Mailing lists
Historic information
  1. ^ a b Although this page does not directly reference Fram, it the basis for the ban
  2. ^ No reference to Fram, but many editors have discussed how we ought to move forward in this page is very relevant to that discussion