This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).
|
|
FYI, in response to your question at WP:RFPP about the notability of Julianne Benzel, I have nominated the article for deletion. Peacock ( talk) 14:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Malcolmxl5,
I have a question and would appreciate your advice. I have a concern that an editor with a possible COI is editing an article by adding non NPOV and OR material, removing cited criticism, criticizing the outlets/organizations that published the criticism, and presenting the article in a white light, per say. What suspects me of a COI is the user's username, small contribution history, as well as the edits performed. I have not attempted to edit the article, discuss with the editor, or engage in any reverting edits or edit wars. I've simply observed the users edits from afar. I did edit the article previously though. The editor has performed huge edits to the article and I don't feel experienced enough to revert all his contributions or open a COI notice board. I don't want to accuse someone of a COI or non constructive edits without proof and I don't feel very experienced to discuss or revert their edits. I would appreciate your advice if this is truly COI/non constructive edits or if I am totally wrong. The article of interest is Middle East Eye. Please let me know if my concern is valid or if I am wrong, I would appreciate to understand more about wiki's editing policies without going around throwing accusations on people or engaging in edit wars. Thank you. Wikiemirati ( talk) 21:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, You deleted and redirected Inou Tsukai. Would you mind undoing the delete? I'd like to SMERGE a bit to the target article and I'd need the article history to exist for citation purposes. Hobit ( talk) 06:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you have deleted Arindam Sharma. I request you kindly undone it. I have many other e-links, and news articles to represent this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Im955 ( talk • contribs) 05:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
On today, I’ve created article 2019 Delhi Temple attack and user Edward Zigma has completely vandalised article by removing some of the selective contents. I don’t know much about Wikipedia but I know that he must be given citations of Wiki policy to remove content but he provided none. He is undoing my every edits which mentions religion.
Please help me to come out with this edit war and make this as my personal request. And help me to block him, I’m facing doxxing on Twitter. Also, Some unknown IP addresses are coming out in my support which maybe considered as sock puppetry. I don’t know what’s happening, I’m using Wikipedia for four years and this never happened.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshil169 ( talk • contribs) 14:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Bl sorry to say. You are using wikipedia as spreading hate propaganda. In India thousands of people lose their life beacuse of fake news and in your article you clearly use the term muslim with mob and all that relgious hate is clearly shown in your article. I just saw you had posted your wiki page as a tweet too. You need help. You cant use wikipedia as relgious propaganda. You article was clearly directed to defame muslims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward Zigma ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
The thing I want to point out is this article is made to direct against muslims. You can check the tweets. I just checked them. He said if muslims got article why shouldn't we. This was just a minor tiff nothing else. But propaganda is spreaded by such people that no one is safe. This article uses relgious slogans so as to direct hate against relgion. I dont have any problem with the article, bit we still need to keep in mind that we cant make wiki page on any law n order issue. If I leave that the problem still persists. If the moderator agree to remove the relgious hate, And cite it properly from proper sources. He literally use small local news blogs which are anti muslims. If he agree to remove all this without lynching, I will agree on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward Zigma ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•@ Malcolmxl5: You can check my edit log to see which was my original content. Article was written with NPOV, verifiablility and No original research. No citation from black listed websites were used. If person don’t like website then it doesn’t mean that website becomes anti-Muslim; it should be black listed on Wikipedia. Also, person has said that I used communal and racial slurs. One can check article and Wikipedia provided list whether I used it or not. What I do on Twitter is not business of any user, users should refrain from doxxing. — Harshil169 ( talk) 16:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
●@ Harshil169: Do I need to show you how these site spread hate against muslims. I has requested the adminitrators to black list them. And let them check these propaganda sites themselves@ Malcolmxl5:.
If she/he finds anything out of the way, he will decide wether to black list or not. If I start using all the hinduphobic sites showing hindu Terrorism in every wikipags and start citing them, i dont think you will last long here. Its better to keep your article in line with the wikipedia policiee and dont use it to provoke hate between communities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zigma ( talk • contribs) 16:43, 2 July 2019 Edward (UTC)
●@ Malcolmxl5: This is the new way to spread hate between communities after fake videos and messages. This is just a daily news , just the issue got bigger. Even if you think this needed a wikipedia I have no problem as far as the content is moderated and no communal allegations are put on any religion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward Zigma ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Kudos for taking the time & trouble to document and block that sockpuppet. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 17:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you for blocking the sockpuppet on the Waekerlé deletion page. I sometimes feel like I’m discussing with an army of trolls and it’s heartening when someone looks in and whacks the more egregious accounts. TheMusicExperimental ( talk) 04:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
user:2600:1001:B106:9BAC:AD6F:75B:E193:CFA is abusing her talkpage. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello @ Malcolmxl5: Thank you so much for helping me with that I guess when they say anything can happen to any one it can Jack90s15 ( talk) 12:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Please, would you be so kind and spare just a few moments to take a look at this case ( History and Talk page), so that you could give me advice regarding protection, as Talk page engagement failed ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santasa9 ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.
Hey ! welcome back to Wiki ! Hope you had fun during your break ! Cheers.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 14:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello @ Malcolmxl5:
Not sure whether I'm in the right place, but could apply some protection to the page titled Mar Thoma Syrian Church? If you check the edit history, it would be clear that this page was continuously subject to multiple disruptive edits by various anonymous user's for the last 6 months. Named user's have largely intervened only to revert those edits. In the talk page of that article, one more user @ Chad The Goatman: has placed the same request as he is fed up of persistent disruptive edits by various Anons who prevent any improvement to that page. Thanks and regards -- Monitor37 ( talk) 14:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pantea Rahmani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Farhikht ( talk) 15:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I randomly came across James Leasor today, which you created not long after he died. The biographical section as it now stands is well-written and cogent, but appears to have been gradually lifted in its entirety from this web page by user:Kipperx during a number of edits, without any attribution. I prefer to make positive contributions to WP, and dislike invoking rules like WP:COPYVIO followed by wholesale deletion. I wonder if you could make the necessary changes, perhaps reverting to something like your original bio section with a ref to the above web page. PS I came across Passport to Peril when I was a teenager, and only today realised how talented Leasor was, although I would never be seen dead in a Cord. Cheers, MinorProphet ( talk) 01:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw this IP 218.234.27.64 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) and I was wondering how do you know it was a proxy? Just curious. Thanks.-- SharabSalam ( talk) 17:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.
focus[ing] on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future, there is currently a global community consultation on partial and temporary office actions in response to the incident. It will be open until October 30th.
Hello, you deleted Michele Martinez in 2016 following AFD. It's just been re-created by the same editor, but doesn't mention anything happening to her post-2016. Is it substantially different from when you deleted it? Thanks, Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 04:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Orlando's Summer of Love. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Johnvr4 ( talk) 18:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure how this should be handled. But the reference here to the deletion discussion that you closed is to a different person's bio. -- 2604:2000:E010:1100:C593:9124:B2F8:CCB5 ( talk) 06:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Malcolmxl5, I just came back to wikipedia editing and noticed that Orlando's Summer of Love stub had been deleted.
(01:03, 27 February 2018 Malcolmxl5 deleted page Orlando's Summer of Love ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlando's Summer of Love)
It's not the end of the world as Beacham Theater covers a small portion of the subject. However it's getting quite large and cannot capture the rest of the material that a well written article on the subject would need to have. Florida breaks in the long term would probably not be appropriate for all of it either.
To the point, I found the supporting assertions of responding editors-some administrators very highly dubious. I have dealt with at least one them numerous times and in my experiences, he does it nearly every interaction I have with him. Can this be resolved without making a big deal out of it or is deletion review the only option here?
After the stub was made, an editor moving to merge in March 2017 questioned whether the subject term was used by only one author. More sources were offered to the editor, and a second move to merge was made. More sources were added for the pending notability discussion as shown below (apologies for the formatting error):
Talk:Orlando,_Florida#Merger_proposal
2017-03-01 Term coined by a single reporter is not notable enough for its own article. Merged to Orlando, Florida#Local culture
2017-03-01 Undid revision 768073072 by Ahecht more sources can be added outside of Orlando
2017-03-01 merge to|Orlando, Florida#Local culture|discuss=Talk:Orlando, Florida#Merger proposal|date=March 2017
2017-03-01 Sources added for notability discussion
Per WP:FAILN this editor requested that the author provide additional sources (I suppose I am the default "subject expert" too but there may be others or better subject experts on WP). That edior was offered and then received many additional sources that should have easily satisfied any WP:FAILN concern. Despite the additional reliable sources added to demonstrate WP:N and WP:GNG for the requesting editor, the merge discussion was opened at Talk:Orlando.
It appears that the original question of WP:FAILN was the only concern put forth to continue the merge discussion and then AfD discussion continued following that.
However, the specific WP:FAILN complaint was that the term "Orlando Summer of Love" was coined by only one author in 1998. However, there is a 2017 source from a different author which was published between the two WP discussions (as discussed below). This source new shows that this concern of the term being used by only one author is unfounded and that there is also WP:SUSTAINED coverage of this subject.
I didn't oppose that merge and a (ridiculous) line now in a sea of garbage was added to Orlando,_Florida#Local_culture while it was decided (recently corrected).
This merge action put the first merge editor into the delete camp when it was re-nominated on 12 February 2018.
In sum, upon renomination, the first editor found that there was (uncontested) reliable and verifiable evidence that the subject existed. But next they complained that there were then fifteen separate references describing the specific time period in Orlando and its impact on local, state, national and international culture where they could read a quote from many sources to know its relevance in establishing this subject was a real thing.
He observed that "references, each directly quoting enough of the source's content that it's dancing right on the edge of the line dividing "fair use" quotation from outright copyright violation," Clearly, this editor was unwilling to read the numerous references he complained about. This editor claimed and summed his complaint as "the biggest reference bomb they'd ever seen". However the WP:OVERCITE accusation was actually a Notibility bomb accusation per the link he supplied. Yet this editor was apparently unable read any of the quoted citation text that established the relationship of the reference to the subject. The implication of his accusation is that "the sources were deceptively added to support notability without regard to whether they actually support substantive or noteworthy content about the topic." However, the editor acknowledged the alleged reference bomb "is a lot more than we need to support a one-sentence substub which just says "this topic existed, the end".
Following a relisting one year later on 19 February 2018, A second editor, who wanted redirection, found the current stub "worse than useless" but that the links would be useful to someone writing a history of music in Orlando. The Irony should not be lost on wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, where any editor could somehow expand a tiny stub into a larger well-referenced article on this period of electronic music history in Orlando--which this article was intended to do someday. This editor found the mention at Orlando# Local culture sufficient for this subject.
A third editor claimed that some of the one sentence might be useful but had "tried to search for this umteen ways, there's just no such thing, not under this name at any rate. This is just something someone made up one day."
Assuming good faith, here, any English reader can establish that this subject exists and is not made up by reading the unchallenged assertion of the first editor or any of the quotations in the alleged "reference bomb". What reasonable person makes the claim of it's just made up in the face of a real or imagined reference bomb and is it actually a reference bomb if two separate editor/administrators are going to come in and make such an unfounded and offensive claim of just making it up?
The other irony here is that not even one of the umpteen super through searches of the internet by this editor apparently included a search engine (or specifically Google). After ten seconds, (eight of those typing the search term and one to press enter) I was able to find new source from November 2017 that was not even included in the aforementioned "reference bomb". There may be more. I stopped here with this one :
The last thing on DJ and Orlando dance music linchpin Kimball Collins' mind back during the fabled Orlando Summer of Love in the early 1990s was that he would someday be responsible for preserving the legacy of Florida Breaks. Fast-forward to 2017 and he is doing just that, but in the form of gigantic parties. It's an extremely rare event that can mix a local history lesson with nonstop ecstatic dancing, but AAHZ nights are just that...Collins explains that this is a party with a purpose, a celebration of an era when Orlando was ground zero for a new type of dance music, and a survey of how that music has changed over the years: "Florida, and Central Florida in particular, gravitated heavily to all types of genres that relied on a type of break-beat from electro, techno, freestyle, Miami bass to straight-up U.K. rave breaks. Those influences went on to develop what would soon become the signature 'Florida break-beat sound.'
The fourth editor for delete echoed the completely and totally absurd assertion of the third editor--if true--which it very obviously was not.
The last editor offered comment that notability of the subject was an issue and that references outweighing the body were problematic (a rule or guideline was not specified) and uploaded a screenshot-- apparently to make this stub into some sort of example. see here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Example_of_article_with_excessive_citation_compared_to_content.png
I submit that the citations may need to merge, but it does not make any sense to merge them in a stub that needs further expansion. Some large quotes may not be entirely necessary (if still online) and the two sources submitted to date that specifically name the subject of the article are both local sources. The sources provided verify the name and reliably describe this subject and show how the subject fits into eight or more different subject articles already established on wikipedia.
Is this something you are able to sort out? Thank you, Johnvr4 ( talk) 23:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Please remove talk page access on User talk:81.155.171.8. Chris Troutman ( talk) 00:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting Daniel A. Dailey. I understand why you waited until now, and I was afraid the disruption would continue... James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 23:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
The Technical Barnstar | |
For sorting out the mess with the Manpreet Singh disambig page. Thank you! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC) |
It's a total disgrace that you are taking part in propaganda war of Bolivia coup. Serek ( talk) 15:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey. Is there any way to get Alejandro Tabilo unprotected from admin protection? I believe he has finally become a notable tennis player, nearly 10 years later. Adamtt9 ( talk) 15:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Repeated after you revdeled and protected. Longer protection probably needeed. Much appreciated. -- Muhandes ( talk) 16:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Interface administrator changes
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive.
Per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Enforcement_log, please add Jerusalem Academy of Music and Dance, Holyland Case, and Ohel Yitzchak Synagogue to the current Arbitration enforcement log. Buffs ( talk) 16:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the pointy edits from 80.233.49.145 :) -- Yamla ( talk) 13:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick action in enacting the range block on Special:Contributions/2607:fea8:929f:ec10::/64. Thank you also for protecting Paw Patrol; sorry for removing my request from RFPP just as you were protecting the page. I think the protection and the range block together will be a huge help to prevent the ongoing abuse. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 00:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
User:2607:FEA8:929F:EC10:E1B6:2C23:7F15:497F is abusing her talkpage. CLCStudent ( talk) 16:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Malcolm
I notice you re-arranged the PC protection on these pages. My apologies, I hadn't registered there was a protection issue here: I put a split proposal up a while ago, and no-one responded, so just went ahead. Should I have held back from the move?
Moonraker12 (
talk) 23:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#John Nicolson. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 17:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for revoking the talk page access of Special:Contributions/104.235.69.89 and for generally patrolling Wikipedia! Keep up the good work! Train of Knowledge ( Talk| Contribs) 22:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
You blocked Special:Contributions/158.222.229.245 at AIV a bit ago. This new account seems to be the same person evading their block. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 21:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
There's an entry in the edit history of Online Blockchain that you closed the afd as delete but the article has not yet been deleted. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
David Sidoni: this page is too new for deletion! Band1301 ( talk) 23:33, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
It just hopelessly hasn't came along here for a whole while, let that article be new here so hard. Band1301 ( talk) 02:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
David Sidoni: Please let this page come here! Band1301 ( talk) 21:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
PrimeBOT (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはMalcolmxl5たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P 03:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpretedrather than
reasonably construed.
Is the current revision of the image at File:Pokemon Stadium 2 battle.jpg too large? It is at 320x237, which is the native resolution of the Nintendo 64 game during gameplay. Matthew Cenance ( talk) 03:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Please remove TPA per NOTHERE; they continue to spam this on their talk page and not talk about their block. Thank you. Nate • ( chatter) 22:32, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Malcolm,
Could you please revive the deleted Enverus page? I see there was no counter argument given and that the page was deleted before any counter points could be made. I think some criticisems were fair but other comments in the deletion dicussion were not reasonable. Thank you again most appreciated De-Stavness ( talk) 21:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
To add to this, the article has been totally rewritten and cleaned up taking in all the valid criticisms. The sources have been cleaned up as well, in taking a second look there were several sources that could be used that wern't listed and would have helped the other wikipedians feel at ease if they had seen them.
See some references here:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2017/08/17/gilmer-we-should-view-the-permian-basin-as-a-permanent-resource/#498cefc156ff https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-22/drillinginfo-founder-changes-company-name-he-never-really-liked
Again please advise on next steps... When I saw the deleted article Wikipedia states to reach out directly to the Admin in charge. Thanks again
De-Stavness ( talk) 22:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Malcolm, I will adjust the Enverus article and provide updates and counter points. Thanks! De-Stavness ( talk) 21:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Malcolm, Looks like someone deleted it before I could add in the adjustments & links - could you relist one more time? Last time i promise- I have been away with no access to the internet over the holiday... Anyways the folks who deleted the article did not look closely enough, they only looked at the rebrand name 'Enverus' and not 'Drillinginfo'. All anyone has to do is Google Drillinginfo and it would make more sense. The CEO just made the cover of Shalemag.com https://shalemag.com/allen-gilmer-a-guy-who-knows-how-to-get-things-done/
De-Stavness ( talk) 21:12, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Again, so the article has been rewritten and I have many new credible links that will support the article along with Wikipedias guidelines. Would you be able to restore the article so that I may adjust it or should i ask the other Wikipedian who deleted the article to restore it? A third option would be for me to just recreate it and put it back up for review, but I want to make sure i follow the rules and have your blessing first. Thanks again De-Stavness ( talk) 21:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I have a question about your edits here and here. The outcome of AfD's for both Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NorthSideBenji and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houdini (rapper) was "delete" (not "redirect"). Shortly after both AfD's closed, the article's creator re-created both NorthSideBenji and Houdini (rapper) as a re-directs. When I nominated both redirects for speedy delete under WP:G4, you did not support this. However, G4 exemptions do not apply to articles recreated "to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy". This same editor also re-created Bvlly, which had been speedy deleted shortly before. Maybe I'm missing something. Thanks! Magnolia677 ( talk) 21:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)