Home
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<
User:Antaeus Feldspar
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Robert_Vaughn_Young&diff=next&oldid=15324926
Robert Vaughn Young
removed
Category:Scientologists
category text clearly stated at that time that it included former Scn
Category:Former Scientologists
not created until June 23, 2005
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Robert_Vaughn_Young&diff=next&oldid=15709413
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Robert_Vaughn_Young&diff=15714473&oldid=15709386
AI's claim that RVY is not a Scn "even if he once was"
Removing
Free Zone
from
Category:Scientology
Article
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=15443536&oldid=15376575
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=17993516
"-cat this does not define Scientology and is already sub-categorized"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18014962
"rv ref:KSW" -- what KSW is is never explained
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18029084
"reverted edits by Antaeus Feldspar to correct version of 1 July 2005, 18:21. See Talk:Free_Zone#Categorization"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18034634
puts on disputed tag which claims that the
factual
accuracy of the article is disputed
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18097198
"REVERT"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18360214
"REVERT"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18365447
"RV "related" is not the determining word in Wikipedia policy about categories"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18369552
"+disputed tag, the misunderstanding is on Antaeus' part, not mine."
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18606868
"-cat The Free Zone is not Scientology"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18717489
"-cat"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18852014
"-category The FREEZONE is not to be categorized under the main Scientology category. Keep it in Category:Free Zone!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18910554
"-cat"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18924520
"rv already explained before"
Talk page
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=18033616&oldid=18028984
- quotes the policy, complete with example to show its proper application, but applies it improperly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18033616
Disputed
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18034760
it is explained how the policy actually works and that the "disputed" tag is for disputing factual accuracy, not categorization
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18098100
repeats misunderstanding that
Free Zone
must define the
parent
category
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18359036
"Quit playing word games and quit wasting my time Antaeus, is Irmgard paying you?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18359238
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18505500
explained again that the answer is "both the category
and
the parent category
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18606704
Is the factual accuracy disputed?
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18638806
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18647407
AI changes a section header in order to completely alter the meaning of the next sentence
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=prev&oldid=18647608
AI changes the indentation to make it seem like part of his dispute
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18717776
asks two rhetorical questions...
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18745570
one which proves to have non-rhetorical answer.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18779657
AI tries to shift the subject to the accidental non-signing of a post
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18856985
AI tries to justify the "disputed" tag on the article by pointing out that
I
removed a first-person anon contribution
Placing
L. Ron Hubbard bibliography
in
Category:Scientology
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:L._Ron_Hubbard_bibliography&diff=18098901&oldid=17718035
My explanation of why it's being removed
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=L._Ron_Hubbard_bibliography&diff=next&oldid=18098695
"rv. What defines scientology? LRH's bibliography"
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=L._Ron_Hubbard_bibliography&diff=next&oldid=18369302
"rv edit to most recent version from BTfromLA in contention with Calton and BTfromLA. Antaeus, take a walk."