From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The Kekulé Problem"
Short story by Cormac McCarthy
Illustration by Don Kilpatrick III
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Genre(s)
Publication
Published in Nautilus 47
Media type
Publication dateApril 20, 2017 (2017-04-20)

"The Kekulé Problem" is a 2017 essay written by the American author Cormac McCarthy for the Santa Fe Institute (SFI). It was McCarthy's first published work of non-fiction. The science magazine Nautilus first ran the article online on April 20, 2017, then printed it as the cover story for an issue on the subject of consciousness. David Krakauer, an American evolutionary biologist who had known McCarthy for two decades, wrote a brief introduction. Don Kilpatrick III provided illustrations.

Summary

Black-and-white photo portrait of a bearded man
Kekulé
An illustration of a snake eating its own tail encircling a ring-like molecular diagram of Benzene
Kekulé's dream
The title refers to the chemist August Kekulé's realization of the ringed structure of benzene after a symbolic dream of the ouroboros. McCarthy asks how the non-linguistic unconscious mind could provide a meaningful solution to a fundamentally linguistic problem.

McCarthy analyzes a famous dream of August Kekulé's as a model of the unconscious mind and the origins of language. He theorizes about the nature of the unconscious mind and its separation from human language. The unconscious, according to McCarthy, "is a machine for operating an animal" and that "all animals have an unconscious." McCarthy postulates that while the unconscious mind is thus a biologically determined phenomenon, language is not.

Analysis

Despite appearing in a scientific journal, "The Kekulé Problem" lacks the formality and rigor found in most scientific literature. [1] The article lacks citations or references to other scientific authorities aside from McCarthy's acquaintances at SFI and Kekulé himself. [2] Instead it is written in the style of a reflective philosophical essay in McCarthy's own first-person voice. There are flashes of direct autobiography, such as an anecdote stemming from one of McCarthy's frequent lunchtime conversations with his friend, the physicist George Zweig. Such elements of memoir are virtually absent from any of McCarthy's published writings. [3] Peter Josyph called it "a reader's memoir. If you like, a thinker's memoir. A wonderer's memoir. Notes of a mental traveler. McCarthy Table Talk," placing it in the tradition of such essayists as " Seneca, Montaigne, Thoreau, Twain, Whitman, Huxley, Orwell, Cendrars, Saroyan, Woolf, Eisely [ sic], Vidal, Miller, Kerouac, Selzer." [4]

Publication

"The Kekulé Problem" was published in the science magazine Nautilus on April 20, 2017. [5] The essay is about 3,000 words long. [6]

Reception

In a review for The New Yorker, Nick Romeo said the essay was a successful adaptation of McCarthy's distinctive writing style into the realm of non-fiction, with its "folksy locutions and no-nonsense sentence fragments and even, at points, the vaguely biblical grandiloquence of his earlier novels", and remarked that the author's "thoughts on the unconscious", though "framed as scientific reflections ... also creep toward theology." [6] At Quartz, Lila MacLellan said the essay provided rare insight into McCarthy's thinking during his time at SFI and praised the way it "somehow distilled the lofty ideas, unanswered questions, and epiphanies collected during this long inquiry into a beautifully written narrative." [7] Steven Pinker, a Canadian-American psycholinguist and author, said he agreed with McCarthy's overall notion that "thought is not the same thing as language" but warned against drawing too many conclusions from the example of Kekulé's dream, noting that "[t]he vast majority of dreams and reveries don't solve major problems in the history of science." [6]

John Gray—a British philosopher and book critic for the New Statesman—said the subject of the Kekulé problem was "hardly surprising" for McCarthy, describing the author's decades-long career in fiction as an "unrelenting struggle to say the unsayable." [8] The McCarthy scholar Jay Ellis said that the paper's greatest value was the insight it provided into the author's worldview, and highlighted its latent dramatic qualities:

[T]he unconscious appears like a Beckett character, difficult to talk with, yet impossible to leave alone. ... The best example of McCarthy inferring intention from the unconscious comes in one of his many strings of rhetorical questions: "It's hard to escape the conclusion that the unconscious is laboring under a moral compulsion to educate us. (Moral compulsion? Is he serious?)" The logic here leaps with dramatic humor. [2]

References

  1. ^ Ellis 2019, p. 186.
  2. ^ a b Ellis 2019, p. 184.
  3. ^ Josyph 2021, p. 106.
  4. ^ Josyph 2021, pp. 105–106.
  5. ^ Ellis 2019, p. 183.
  6. ^ a b c Romeo 2017.
  7. ^ MacLellan 2017.
  8. ^ Gray 2022.

Sources

  • Baker, Erik (December 22, 2022). "Reenchanted Science". The Baffler. New York: The Baffler Foundation. Archived from the original on December 22, 2022. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
  • Berridge, George (March 23, 2018). "Madness and civilization: The literary influences and output of an American genius". The Times Literary Supplement. No. 5999. London. p. 23. Gale  A634283993.
  • Christman, Phil (March 2023). "Ghost Guilts". Commonweal. 150 (3). New York: Commonweal Foundation: 42–43. EBSCOhost  162251799.
  • Cooper, Lydia R. (2021). Cormac McCarthy: A complexity theory of literature. Contemporary American and Canadian Writers. Manchester University Press. ISBN  978-1-5261-4858-2.
  • Ellis, Jay (2019). "Chapter 17 - Science and Technology". In Frye, Steven (ed.). Cormac McCarthy in Context. Cambridge University Press. pp. 180–194. doi: 10.1017/9781108772297.018. ISBN  978-1-108-80869-9. S2CID  243436908.
  • Giemza, Bryan (2017). "Mirror-Image Asymmetry, Chirality, and Suttree". European Journal of American Studies. 12 (3). London: The European Association for American Studies: 1–29. doi: 10.4000/ejas.12336. ISSN  1991-9336.
  • ——— (2023). Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN  978-1-5013-8379-3.
  • Gray, John (October 19, 2022). "The Passenger: The phantom world of Cormac McCarthy". New Statesman. London. Retrieved July 1, 2023.
  • Josyph, Peter (October 16, 2021). "A Few Nice Things and a Few Problems with 'The Kekulé Problem'". The Cormac McCarthy Journal. 19 (2). Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press: 203–218. doi: 10.5325/cormmccaj.19.2.0203. S2CID  240982944. Project MUSE  814967.
  • MacLellan, Lila (April 21, 2017). "Cormac McCarthy explains the brutal, beautiful neuroscience of the unconscious". Quartz. New York: G/O Media. Archived from the original on May 4, 2017. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
  • McCarthy, Cormac (March–April 2017a). "The Kekulé Problem: Where did language come from?" (PDF). Nautilus. No. 19. New York: NautilusThink, Inc. pp. 22–31. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  • ——— (November 27, 2017b). "Cormac McCarthy Returns to the Kekulé Problem". Nautilus. New York: NautilusThink, Inc. Archived from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 1, 2023.
  • O'Connor, Patrick (2022). Cormac McCarthy, Philosophy and the Physics of the Damned. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN  978-1-4744-9728-2.
  • Romeo, Nick (April 22, 2017). "Cormac McCarthy Explains the Unconscious". The New Yorker. New York: Condé Nast. Archived from the original on April 24, 2017. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  • Stagg, Guy (February–March 2023). "The Solitary Road". The London Magazine: 65–71. ISSN  0024-6085. EBSCOhost  161597867.

External links

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=The_Kekulé_Problem&oldid=1186487256"