Forestry Template‑class | |||||||
|
I have removed the 'woodworkers' section. There is no indication that the woodworkers listed are more important or influential than the 90+ woodworkers in the category furniture makers, or the 100+ names in the luthiers category. I do not see how this template could accurately list the most influential names from such a large pool. There are probably other categories with similar overlap. Dialectric ( talk) 14:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Timber framing is a type of carpentry which has it's own article. Should it be added to this template? For that matter, Log cabin and Log house could be added or a new article which covers all kinds of log building techniques could be started and then added (there are many, ancient techniques and uses worldwide).-- Jim Derby ( talk) 18:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, or even have its own dedicated template. Go for it, Jim Derby! HLHJ ( talk) 18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
The entry for Linden/Lime/Basswood is under the softwoods. However they are deciduous dicotyledonous angiosperms and therefore hardwoods. MFdeS ( talk) 03:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough, I've always seen it as softwood due to it's characteristics, but I guess in scientiffic terms it's classed as a hardwood. Moved it to Hardwoods Raymond Holmoey ( talk) 20:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
For plum wood see this link Peter Horn User talk 21:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Marquetry, parquetry, intarsia, purfling, binding (woodworking), edge banding, etc. seem like they need a category. HLHJ ( talk) 18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Delete the following lines from 'occupations':