This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
(The
task force template) also fails for apparently correct importance=low. The categorization is correct, but the presentation omits the importance. See for example:
[1] --
Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (
Talk) 18:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Jj98: Does the removal of this parameter affect Wikipedia 1.0 ? Please either restore the importance code to the template, or update the wikiproject and template documentation, and post a bulletin at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. The relevant documentation pages I checked before I reported this as a bug are at:
Not done for now: too much regression would result. Please base your changes on the current template, not one that is three years old. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 18:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Redrose64: I've updated the sandbox version with the current template, could you take a look at it again? This is my first template edit so any guidance would be appreciate. Thanks –
dlthewave☎ 01:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)reply
According to this edit by
Mr. Guye (
talk·contribs), four of the task forces are defunct, hence the associated parameters are deprecated. Is there a proposal anywhere to remove these parameters from the template proper? --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 07:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Redrose64 and
Mr. Guye: I just made some changes to the
template sandbox on this matter. It would seek to put the defunct task forces into the note section instead of side-by-side with the active ones. Would there be any objection to this change? –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 21:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Template-protected edit request on 4 July 2019
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
There has been no objection to this change, so I'm going to assume that it's fine. Please, Copy and Paste code found at {{
WikiProject Politics/sandbox}}. Cheers, –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 02:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)reply
nvm. Let me make some changes. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 03:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Template-protected edit request on 11 March 2020
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please sync with
Sandbox. I've re-ordered the task forces and added a new WikiProject which has merged with
WP:POLITICS –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 15:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
MJL, is there any particular reason for the rearrange, or is it just a convenient side effect of adding the new task force? What is the new order, and how is it different from the old?
Primefac (
talk) 17:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC) (please
ping on reply)reply
@
Primefac: I moved the inactive/defunct task forces to the bottom of the list (see
above; this was easier than what I said I was going to do). –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 19:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Template-protected edit request on 18 December 2020
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Add alias for {{{American|}}} and {{{American-importance|}}} to support {{{American|{{{american|}}}}}} and {{{American-importance|{{{american-importance|}}}}}} –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 19:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)reply