 | Archaeology Template‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Norse history and culture NA‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | England Template‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | The contents of the Template:Viking Invasion of England page were merged into Template:Viking activity in Great Britain. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Compare this with Template:Viking Invasion of England. I think that is more comprehensive; has more of the battles. But doesn't have all the people. Also, I'm not too excited about the Etymology "List of Places." I think most of those should go.
Anyway, they should probably be compared, IMO. Student7 ( talk) 21:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Given the lack of objections, page moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 ( talk) 20:51, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Template:Scandinavian England → Template:Norse activity in the British Isles – Per WP:CONSISTENCY with main article Norse activity in the British Isles. PPEMES ( talk) 17:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. B dash ( talk) 04:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
@ Primefac: Following Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_5#Template:Viking_Invasion_of_England, isn't rather Template:Viking Invasion of England due to be merge here with Template:Norse activity in the British Isles, than the other way around? PPEMES ( talk) 19:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- I read the only "vote" as indicating a preference for the name to be at "Viking Invasion". If I misread it or it makes more sense to merge everything here, go for it; there was clearly not a lot of opposition to the merger (or really any preference for anything).
Primefac (
talk) 23:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Updated infoboxes accordingly.
PPEMES (
talk) 12:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- I've decided to keep the name here as the scope is slightly larger, but I would not object if anyone went ahead and changed it. -- Trialpears ( talk) 23:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Updated infoboxes accordingly.
PPEMES (
talk) 12:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.( non-admin closure) Celia Homeford ( talk) 14:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Template:Norse activity in the British Isles → Template:Viking activity in the British Isles – The usual term for the Scandinavian invaders is Vikings not Norse. The Oxford Illustrated History of the Vikings has a chapter by Simon Keynes with the title 'The Vikings in England, c. 970-1016'. Krakkos has pointed out many other examples at Talk:Norsemen#The common name for the Old Norse-speaking peoples of Viking Age. The word Norsemen is occasionally used as a synomyn for Vikings, but more often specifically for Norwegian rather than Danish Vikings. The articles and templates which use the term Norse for Viking should be changed to avoid confusion. The previous move to the current name was carried through with no discussion. Dudley Miles ( talk) 13:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRECISION. It might be an idea to change the title of Norse activity in the British Isles as well. Krakkos ( talk) 11:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I noticed that the links for the battles of Chippenham, and York currently lead to subsections within the articles for those places. Standalone articles for these - Battle of Chippenham and Battle of York (867) - have recently been created for these. I'm not sure how best to update templates, or if there is any particular process, but please could these be updated?
At the same time, if the battles are meant to be in chronological order, should the battle of Chippenham appear before the battle of Cynwit?-- CSJJ104 ( talk) 11:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- All done. Thanks for pointing these out. Dudley Miles ( talk) 12:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)