This template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
I have
reverted your edit on "Template:Universalism" as the reason you gave was not appropriate.
It is mention in the intro of the article
Universalism that, "In terms of religion, in a broad sense, universalism claims that religion is a universal human quality". This exactly matches the Jain view that "dharma" is the very nature or quality of the soul.
Another statement in the intro read, "A community that calls itself universalist may emphasize the universal principles of most religions and accept other religions in an inclusive manner". This is exactly what
Jainism's most fundamental doctrine of
Anekantavada is about.
Many other Jain philosophical concepts have universal applicability. I don't see even a single reason as to why "Jain philosophy" shouldn't be part of the said "Template".
@
जैन: thank you for your explanation. I'm afraid, though, that this is your personal understanding, c.q.
WP:OR. The article on
Jainism doesn't even mention "universalism." Start with adding info on Jain-universalism to this article; otherwisel linking to this article is as relevant as linking to any other random religion without info on universalism. Have you got sources which say that Jainism calls itself "universalistic"? See, for example,
[1] and
[2] on Jain universlaism in the 20th century. David Gordon White, on the other hand: " From the early christian era to the twelfth century,Jainism was a proselytizing religion with no universalistic claims."
[3]. Best regards,
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk! 16:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply