This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Untitled
Would it be possible to add content to the code that would automatically add stubbed items to
Category:American writers? That would be a helpful addition, obviating the need for a separate action at the time of article composition as a stub. This would need to be a parameterized alteration so that the indexing term for the category is required at the time of stub template addition.
Courtland 04:18, 28 August 2005 (UTC)reply
I've never seen that done to other stubs, and I don't think it's desired behaviour. Once the stub has grown enough you are supposed to remove the stub tag and then you'd have to add [[Category:American writers|<whatever>]] to it anyway. Pluss if it's for example a novelist then [[Category:American novelists|<whatever>]] should be used instead and the American writers part becomes redundant contributing to bloading that category unnessesarily. It might be an idea to add the stub cat itself as a child of
Category:American writers though. That way people browsing for American writers will be more likely to find it. In fact I think I'll do that right now. --
Sherool 14:19, 28 August 2005 (UTC)reply
I think this template should refer to "American writers" instead of "US writers", just because that seems like a more grammatically correct way of stating nationality, and it seems to have become convention on Wikipedia.
Andrea Parton 17:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)reply
US -> U.S. per MoS
The Wikipedia Manual of Style says that U.S. is preferred over US. Could someone please change the template to reflect this?
Dismas|
(talk) 08:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Request for change of template
Since there is now a {{
US-poet-stub}} template, this template should say just "This article is about a United States writer", not "...about a United States writer or poet...".
J. Finkelstein 02:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)reply