Palaeontology Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Arthropods Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

While SJG was many things a notable trilobiteologist does not seem to fit the bill, given that his Wikipedia entry does not mention trilobites once... my understanding is that it was Niles Eldridge who did the actual trilobite studies. Psuedomorph ( talk) 13:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Feel free to remove him and replace with Niles Eldridge. I'm actually not familiar with both (or any of them for that matter). I simply followed what sources pointed as possible important trilobitologists.--  Obsidi♠n ^Soul 13:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

I edited the Hypostome link for more precise direction. Additionally, if the "notable fossils" are so notable, why are most of them in red? Of the species with articles, only Isotelus clearly explains notability (largest complete fossil). Without defining notability, this list could be mistaken for bias, e.g. an editor's favorite taxa, and/or articles they've created. --Animalparty-- ( talk) 22:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC) reply