Buddhism Template‑class

This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Tibet NA‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles NA This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This template needs some work. Everything is thrown in in a jumble. Let's think about adding some organization. Curious Blue ( talk) 23:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Agreed. I'm just going to go straight ahead and edit. Aero13792468 ( talk) 20:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC) reply

What is the criteria (if any) for a figure being included in the list of "key figures"? While there are many important figures there are many others who really don't match any sensible definition of that term - they are all jumbled together and the list grows ever longer. Perhaps on this page (or a sub page specifically for the purpose) people could cite a couple of reliable sources and give reasons why a figure should be on that list. Meanwhile I'm tempted to prune that list to a more manageable and useful size. Chris Fynn ( talk) 07:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC) reply