This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : *
Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) *
Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize
Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. *
Sport in the United Kingdom - the
Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Please note that per
WP:NOTRED and
WP:EXISTING, it is not appropriate to include unlinked and redlinked text in this navbox, as naboxes exist to provide navigation between existing articles. --
Rob Sinden (
talk) 10:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)reply
And the guidelines also allow links were something is part of a series. Olympic sports are part of a series. Some of the other stuff linked looked like a data dump, last I heard bowling is not an IOC sport, so I agree that those should be tossed, they may even have been prank edits. I think that less than a half-dozen redlinks are fine now.
Montanabw(talk) 18:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)reply