This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Why is it necessary to reduce font sizes to these unreadable 80%? If it is done to reduce the height of the template, then there are other ways, as exemplified on
Oberliga (football). Please review and possibly revise that change...
Madcynic 11:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm with you. I'm all for using a standardized look across the German football competition templates, but the things should be easy to read. Going with fonts at 100% will match the rest of the page, as well as making it readable. There's room to spare so I can't see why not.
Wiggy! 13:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Bullet points
While I do understand the purpose of using nowrap, I don't think that bullet points help the readability of the template. For readability reasons, I'd like to revert to using | instead of bulletpoints, and if necessary, discontinue the use of nowrap. Opinions? --
Madcynic 19:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)reply
No objection here, though I'd prefer it if we didn't use arbitrary linebreaks instead. These make the template that little bit larger than it needs to be. Not sure if there's a {{nowrap}} template using the | divider, however. -
Dudesleeper ·
Talk 21:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I like the readability you get from making the names hang together in one piece. But I also like the bars rather than the bullets. A dilemma ...
Wiggy! 00:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Nicely done, Dudesleeper. Simple.
Wiggy! 03:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)reply
