This template is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
health and
physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
have added it now, as there were no objections.
EvM-Susana (
talk) 21:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)reply
update 2015-11
Done most of the maintenance job
ICON
Below bar
Top bar
list check
should only come back here once half years for quick scan.(if encounter any question leave in my talk page) --
Composcompos12 (
talk) 05:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Disputed content
An IP user posted at
Wikipedia:Help desk#Help with Template:Public health objecting to
this edit and
this edit by
Bazj, having already reverted the changes. I have repeated most of the removals. This template is already very large, perhaps too large to be useful as a navbox. What should and should not belong here? Does anyone care to comment?
DES(talk) 17:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
As for the template, even stripping the template back to
a version predating Composcompos12's contributions would leave it full of bloat. Including a chunk on statistics is as irrelevant as including a section on pen-manufacturing because folks working in PH write stuff down.
I'll post a request for help at
WT:MED.
Bazj (
talk) 20:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Bazj as per
WP:LOGOUT "There is no policy against editing while logged out." and doing so is not sock puppetry, unless the editor attempted to deceive others into thinking that multiple different editors were making the edits. So it doesn't really matter if the IP is in fact
Composcompos12 or if they merely agree. I agree that the current template is over-large, and should be cut down.
DES(talk) 20:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
DESiegel, Logged out user reverting to reinstate edits of logged in user would constitute puppetry as it creates the impression that two editors favour that version rather than just one. 1st & 5th example at
WP:ILLEGIT.
Bazj (
talk) 21:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Possible improvements needed
I also wonder if this template has become too big and complex but I am not so sure what the guidelines would say and perhaps public health is a large and complex topic? Nevertheless we shouldn't go into too much detail on sub-topics of public health, I guess. - What are the other areas where improvements are needed for this template? What are your suggestions? Perhaps
User:Doc_James has an opinion?
EvMsmile (
talk) 03:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Maybe we should add a whole new sub-category here about professions/occupations of those working in public health?
EMsmile (
talk) 15:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)reply