This template is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Finance and
Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This template is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity Task Force, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the
private equity and
venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
This task force seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:
I noticed that the link labeled "
Bootstrap funding" points to the (differently "named") article on
Entrepreneurship. ("[[Entrepreneurship|Bootstrap funding]]"). I understand that there may be some story behind this -- (such as, perhaps there used to be an article on "
Bootstrap funding", which no longer exists?) (and, it now "re-directs" to the article on
Entrepreneurship); but I have not taken the time to study the history thereof.
Anyone care to clue me in? TIA, --
Mike Schwartz (
talk) 15:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Template Content
Should the top section be sub-divided to accommodate strategies (there are large, mid and small-cap strategies; also buyout, growth, minority, pipe etc; also different investment theses e.g. distress, operational alpha, financial engineering, tax engineering etc).
Also worth thinking about where tactics (?) like operating groups / partners, tied advisors etc sit in the taxonomy.
Super useful to have these though ! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
63.92.241.89 (
talk) 20:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)reply