This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography This template is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{ WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs Maps This template is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles Open ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

I like this template very much, but I guess "equivalents" groups should be improved. I have added OSM template to all the possible entries (as it is with all the navigating templates I know), but at least one such addition was lately reverted. I was also not 100% sure, so I think we should make this template more closely OSM-related. One thing could be removing "OSM closed-license equivalents" and for me that could be enough, but if we think it's still too broad, we could also remove "Other crowd-sourced projects and equivalents". Those entries belong to the more general template {{ Earth}}, I think. Currently they are collected there under "Imaging" group (OSM is one of them), but we could rework it if needed. What are your opinions? -- kocio ( talk) 10:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Kocio: I don't think this template should have the "Similar free projects" or "Proprietary equivalents" rows at all. If readers need to see these links at the bottom of the OpenStreetMap article, then the links can go in a "See also" section or in a separate "Online maps" navbox template. As it is, it doesn't make sense to me that, for instance, there would be a direct link to Yahoo! Maps or Ordnance Survey Ireland at the bottom of the article about JOSM or Missing Maps. After all, this navbox wouldn't be appropriate to add to the Yahoo! Maps article. –  Minh Nguyễn  ^💬 19:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC) reply