This template is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New Zealand and
New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
I think it is a very bad idea to add nowrap templates to this topic. For people with screens or browser windows less than the length of a full line, then they will have to scroll to see the full table. The exact resolution will depend on font size used, but I think even people with 1024x768 resolution will have trouble. This is very poor design, and so I have removed the templates.-
gadfium 20:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Never mind, I realise that the job was only half done. I've finished it.-
gadfium 20:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Fortifications
Why is
fortifications in this? They're not particularly important.
I agree that the fortifications are not of sufficient importance to be included.
By all means add a "People" line. I suggest not adding individual nationalities such as
Samoan New Zealander, because there is no clear point at which to say that certain nationalities are sufficiently important to be included, and others aren't. All such groups are or should be covered by
Immigration to New Zealand.-
gadfium 20:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Prostitution
Is prostitution in New Zealand really worth being on this template?
Adabow (
talk) 06:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Probably not I think. Certainly many other topics that are equally important are currently omitted (see e.g. the articles in
Category:New Zealand society). --
Avenue (
talk) 22:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Palmerston North
Why is Palmerston North included in the list of cities? I would suggest changing the list to either only include 100,000+ cities or include
all cities, because cutting it off at those points makes sense, whereas cutting it off after Palmerston North seems to me like a very arbitrary and unusual choice. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Videomaniac29 (
talk •
contribs) 08:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)reply
It was the
previous edit that added the list of cities. I have to agree that Palmy North is an unusual cut off. The editor appears to be doing a lot of work on templates, and would not appear to be from New Zealand. I suggest we simply remove Palmy North, and that leaves 100,000+ cities. Schwede66 09:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)reply
I have removed Palmerston North. The only other 'cut-off' that would make sense would be to include all cities, but that would make the list become two lines, so I would suggest leaving it as it is now. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Videomaniac29 (
talk •
contribs) 05:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Just commenting to note that the number of lines the row takes up is dependent on the size of the browser window.
Ollieinc (
talk) 08:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)reply