This template is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its
documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject My Little Pony, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
My Little Pony related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.My Little PonyWikipedia:WikiProject My Little PonyTemplate:WikiProject My Little PonyMy Little Pony articles
Minor cast and crew
Is there really any reason to list so many minor people who worked on the show once? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.26.30.240 (
talk) 22:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)reply
A lot of templates I've seen do that; and it doesn't really clutter it up at all. --
Yellow1996 (
talk) 16:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Shouldn't there at least be some distinction between the core and non-core cast and crew? --
98.26.30.240 (
talk) 22:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Actually, that's a pretty good idea! If you have an idea on how that could be organized, then please go ahead and make the change. --
Yellow1996 (
talk) 23:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Discord article
I created a separate article for
Discord; I believe this template should link directly to it.
User:Immblueversion (
talk) 01:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)reply
I agree with this. This template is to be used to navigate between articles, not to present info like crew members or spinnoffs. Info can be found in the articles, therefor there is no need to include it here. When the articles about them are written, they can be included again.
Gial Ackbar (
talk) 16:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Correct List + Linking
I assume the correct way to fix this onto this template. This should be it.
Season 1 ("Friendship is Magic" - "The Best Night Ever")
This template links to exiting articles, it is not supposed to give the first and last episode of a season, only episodes that have articles about them.
Gial Ackbar (
talk) 15:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)reply
A bunch of new cast links
I'm concerned with the large number of cast links added recently. There is a
long-running discussion about how the "bidirectionality" of navboxes should be implemented. That is: Should every article that includes (
transcludes) the navbox also have a link? And vice versa? I'm leaning toward the view expressed by some in that discussion: If it's not appropriate for the article to include the navbox, then it shouldn't be linked from it. In that case, the links here need some serious pruning.
Anon126 (
notify me of responses! /
talk /
contribs) 21:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)reply
I would agree that there should be bi-directionality, otherwise why have the navbox? (Note that Categories can still be used to further classify MLPFIM-related staffers if we wouldn't otherwise include a box on their page). --
MASEM (
t) 22:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)reply
What should you do to that navbox, if I want to prune that? --
Allen(
talk to me! /
ctrb /
E-mail me) 23:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)reply
I have a feeling that the title of the "Fandom" subgroup should link to the main fandom article, similar to the "Episodes" link. But that would leave the term brony/bronies absent. Thoughts?
Anon126 (
notify me of responses! /
talk /
contribs) 05:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Hi, please discuss the table title here. I believe it should be "
My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic" because all the content listed is spun-off from the series. There is no separate "2010 toy line and media franchise".
Furry-friend (
talk) 17:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Since G4 is coming to a close, I think the proper title is Friendship is Magic, since there won't be any other My Little Pony toys and media that are not derived from the Friendship is Magic television series, and G5 is positioned as the "successor" for the TV series.
Furry-friend (
talk) 13:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Is this template really necessary? Couldn't all relevant information be place in the relevant sub-heading in the main
MLP template.
惑乱 Wakuran (
talk) 19:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)reply
What you said is so. There's just so much G4 content that it needs its own navigation box, but it can be within the overall nav box on non-G4 articles.
Dogman15 (
talk) 07:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)reply
What's the procedure in that case? Would you add a Merge-into -tag proposal on top or something?
惑乱 Wakuran (
talk) 13:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)reply