This template is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This template is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this template, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Header links
I've removed the links to Man, Boy, and Masculinity from this template per
WP:NAVBOX criteria #1, 2, and 3. Placing these links directly underneath the link to Masculism implies that the latter is an umbrella topic covering all aspects of the former, which is clearly not the case. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk) 22:51, 12 May 2019 (UTC)reply
That seems reasonable to me. --
Aquillion (
talk) 17:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)reply
There is a move discussion in progress on
Template talk:Masculism sidebar which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
RMCD bot 04:31, 31 May 2019 (UTC)reply