This template is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Hello,
Just a note that
North Tower (Salford) is not in Manchester. Can we look at finding a way to present this? -- perhaps with an asterix or some kind of marker/note? --Jza84 |
Talk 01:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Since the North Tower isn't in Manchester perhaps it doesn't belong on this template?
Nev1 (
talk) 16:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)reply
It's in
Manchester City Centre so no harm in it staying, there are a few non-Manchester buildings on the template but they are almost always referred to as being in Manchester e.g. Manchester's Trafford Centre. ┌Joshii┐└chat┘ 15:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)reply
We've also got the
Trafford Centre and
Old Trafford listed here. Same concern as before - do these belong here? If so, can we have an asterix or marker showing they are outside of Manchester? --Jza84 |
Talk 01:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)reply
18 months on..... I'm going to remove the non-Manchester entities. --Jza84 |
Talk 22:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Mills and warehouses
Sure this is a jest- Manchester had 1800+ warehouses by 1815- there are 94 cotton mills refered to in Williams and Farnie.
List of mills in Manchester refers. 6 mills (or groups of mills)have individual articles and many more have substantial information included in the list that merit a link. Loads of work still to do- if you have an idle moment. --
ClemRutter (
talk) 16:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Red links
Lots of red links here in the past 6 months. It is worth pointing out that, in line with
WP:REDNOT, "editors who add excessive red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or they may be removed from the template."
Cnbrb (
talk) 10:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
@
ChrisClarke88: as you apparently added all the redlinks, are you hard at work writing lots of articles to fill the gaps?
Cnbrb (
talk) 20:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)reply