From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because there is enough articles to suffice navigation, plus it will only expand at this point. Nice4What ( talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ) 11:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC) reply

It was recently deleted by means of a TFD discussion, which deemed there were not enough articles to warrant a navbox. The rule of thumb is often around 5 articles per WP:NENAN. It seems the artist in question has recently released an EP, and there is now an article for a non-single song from that EP, which is of dubious notability. -- wooden superman 11:59, 25 June 2019 (UTC) reply
The article for the non-single exists and still counts. woodensuper's personal opinion that the article shouldn’t exist does not equate to consensus. Speedy should be declined.— N Ø 13:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Like I said, the very recent discussion was based on WP:NENAN, which calls for five articles as a rule of thumb. To re-create this such a short time afterwards, without it meeting this threshold, means that the decision at TFD has not been respected. -- wooden superman 13:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC) reply
You’re misrepresenting, though. Five articles are included on the template currently. It’s you who thinks one of them shouldn’t exist, which does not equate to a consensus and thus there’s no grounds for speedy deletion of this template. "Rodeo" is bound to chart and become notable in less than a week as it’s charting at #14 on iTunes and #7 on Spotify. So this template is here to stay whether you personally agree or not.— N Ø 13:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Four entries, excluding the subject. All already well linked, as they are all tracks from a single EP. -- wooden superman 13:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Fair enough. It’s very likely that more than one EP track ends up charting though. So your dedication to keep this template deleted feels like a useless time sink. There’s barely a difference between 4 entries or 5.— N Ø 14:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC) reply