This template is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
Consider joining this project's
Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are
transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
Looking good
I would re-word the "subsidiaries" section as that is usually refers to corporate business structure, not food. --
Jeremy (
Blah blah...) 08:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Move
I renamed this to the original title to conform with developed standards for food and drink related articles. --
Jeremy (
Blah blah...) 05:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Good job. The main title is "Korean cuisine" and previous move by Sardanaphalus was unfit to the article. Everything is back to normal.--
Caspian blue (
talk) 11:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Piture
Please use another picture. Kimbap is Japanese, not Korean. It's the Korean word for the Japanese food during the Colonial period, an era of Korean history where Japanese people try to assimilate and destroy Korean culture. There must be a more representative picture of Korean food than one with
sushi.
Curb Chain (
talk) 13:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)reply
I thought the same thing. As far as I know, Gimbap is at best a Korean interpretation of maki-zushi. Even if that were not the case, the gimbap dish presented in the picture seemed quite haphazardly cut and served. I thought about changing it to File:Gimchi.jpg, File:Korean.cuisine-Bulgogi-01.jpg or File:Korean cuisine-Bibimbap-08.jpg, but File:Korean.food-Hanjungsik-01.jpg seemed to be the most aesthetically pleasing (personally). I'll gladly take any criticisms.
Humorahead01 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 19:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC).reply
Navbox
This should be a navbox instead. It's anyway placed at the end of articles most of the times, and looks seriously ridiculous there. Navbox format would be better, see
hu:Sablon:Koreai gasztronómia.
Teemeah편지 (letter) 16:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)reply
You are free to move the sidebar to a better place in the article. No need to rebuild it. The Bannertalk 18:40, 24 March 2013 (UTC)reply
In fact, the template used to be a rather massive nav box, until it was condensed to a side bar in 2011. Unfortunately, the guy that did the rebuilding, did not move the side bar to a proper place. The Bannertalk 19:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Exsqueze me? Whatch yu talkin' about Willis? I most certainly put it in the proper spot, at the head of the article. That is where these types of templates go. Stopping away in much maligned huff... --Jeremy(
blah blah •
I did it!) 21:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Perhaps you did, and somebody else reverted it. But the effect is quite unfortunate. I have done a few now but I don't know how many more has to be done. No worth fighting over. The Bannertalk 22:10, 24 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Amended "조선 요리 (joseon yori)" to "조선 료리 (joseon ryori)" which is the standard spelling for "요리 (yori)" in North Korea.
DandanxD (
talk) 02:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Kimchi bokkeumbap a staple but kimchi is not?
Question about Staples: is there a good reason why Kimchi bokkeumbap is listed as a staple, when it seems to be a composed dish including two other items on the list? Kimchi, however, is not. I'm not Korean, so I won't change this, but is it possibly accurate? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.86.48.255 (
talk) 03:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)reply
transliteration templates
Hi, I just put all the non-English text in transliteration templates. I'm not 100% confident this is correct (do these rules still apply in templates like these? I think they do?), but my understanding of the
MOS:LANG and
MOS:FOREIGNITALIC seems to suggest this
toobigtokale (
talk) 00:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)reply