From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Genealogy Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject icon Hawaii Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please stick with the known fact that it is a debatable issue. And refrain from using terms like "almost certainly". I am fine with the change because it leaves Kaneikapolei as the mother without presenting who was the father. The line between her and Kalaniopuu should be removed to since it makes no sense to show her union with him but not Kamehameha. -- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 16:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I don't have to refrain from using ANY such terms. I have not used them in the actual tree and the fact is, yes most main stream academics do say that it is most likely that Kalaniopuu was the father. However we do know for a fact that Kanekapolei was married to Kalaniopuu and that should be shown. A disclaimer in the box of Pauli can make the information more clear.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 00:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC) reply