From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Israel Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Campaignbox structure not suitable

Once, the campaignbox structure is not suitable for this topic. It makes it look like a war campaign. What you should use is navbox such as Template:Arab–Israeli conflict (topics). In fact, you should just add occupations issues there, rather than standalone navbox. GreyShark ( dibra) 05:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Greyshark09: I thought about the same, but on reflection military occupation is part of war, even if unnaturally extended over decades. Onceinawhile ( talk) 06:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Military occupation is the legal ending of the war in line with Geneva conventions, establishing temporary governance over occupied areas. Your idea here however is quite different - it deals with Israeli take over of Dar al-Islam, which is seen illegal from Islamic theology and stands for Arabic: احتلال, no matter the legal international status (temporary governance, annexation, autonomy, etc). Most of those issues are not military occupation per definition - Gaza has no military governance, neither South Lebanon ever had, State of Palestine is not military governed by Israeli Army (except Area C by COGAT), Golan is annexed. All past occupations are already described under Israeli Military Governorate and Israeli Civil Administration. Forking is not helpful, but waste of time on your behalf. GreyShark ( dibra) 05:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Changed to navbox, you are welcome to play with it - much more relevant navbox than military campaignbox. GreyShark ( dibra) 05:44, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Interesting idea. I much prefer the smaller version. Maybe we should have an RFC to compare the two versions? Onceinawhile ( talk) 06:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Your are welcome to do an RfC. GreyShark ( dibra) 09:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply

I am avoiding "war campaign" semblances by keeping it WP:NPOV, this way it is just a navbox for the articles related to the status of the situation and not just the war efforts of Israel. To be specific, the Golan Heights annexation is globally-contested and so I am replacing the link with simply "Status of the Golan Heights", this way it is NPOV and not a war campaign at all anymore. The navbox is indeed very useful for such an important topic. Best, Altanner1991 ( talk) 23:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Navbox width query

Does anyone know how to increase the width of the default navbox display format when expanded - it is currently displaying incorrectly: see this example usage. Iskandar323 ( talk) 08:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC) reply