This template is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This template is part of WikiProject Theatre, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the template attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
{{#if:{{{1<includeonly>|</includeonly>}}}{{{id|}}}{{#property:P4456}}
|[http://www.lortel.org/Archives/CreditableEntity/{{Trim|{{{1|{{{id<includeonly>|{{#property:P4456}}</includeonly>}}}}}}}} {{#if:{{{2|{{{name<includeonly>|</includeonly>}}}}}}|{{{2|{{{name}}}}}}|{{PAGENAMEBASE}}}}] at the [[Lortel Archives|Internet Off-Broadway Database]]<includeonly>{{EditAtWikidata|pid=P4456|{{{1|{{{id|}}}}}}}}{{WikidataCheck|property=P4456|value={{{1|{{{id|}}}}}}|category=Internet Off-Broadway Database person ID}}</includeonly>
|<span class="error">{{[[Template:Iobdb name|Iobdb name]]}} template missing ID and not present in Wikidata.</span>{{Main other|[[Category:Iobdb name template missing ID]]}}
}}{{Main other|[[Category:Articles with Iobdb links]]}}<noinclude>
{{Documentation}}
</noinclude>
Not done: please establish a
consensus for this alteration before requesting template edits. Also, see this
ArbCom motion. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 04:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Request for Comment for Updating for Wikidata
I would like to request an rfc on whether to update the template to pull in Wikdiata information. I do that their was an ArbCom notice back in November of last year about establishing need for it. I would like to suggest that this template be updated to use and pull the Wikidata information, such as the identifier id for it. While some may say why rely on Wikidata, while we should not you need to realize that most of our infobox's pull stuff from Wikidata especially those on our other language versions of Wikipedia, as that is why that project was founded as a catalog of information to make putting information into templates and connecting pages across the language spectrum easier. We don't need to update the template to only pull information from Wikidata but of course allow still the usage of putting the identifier id in manually. Some may think that opens it up to cross project vandalism, well maybe so but Wikidata does have active editors and admins that maintain it. --
Clarkcj12 (
talk) 03:42, 29 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Wikidata really doesn't have active anti-vandalism measures, which is a large part of the problem. Nevertheless, I think I can support, contingent upon there existing a way to manually override the Wikidata value and upon all articles which have currently defined a value being opted in to that override. That way, nothing that currently is correct will be be rendered incorrect by nonsense on Wikidata's end. —
Compassionate727(
T·
C) 13:43, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
How many templates do we have on the English Wikipedia that pull from Wikidata by default? I haven't been paying much attention to Wikidata arguments lately, but the last time I read through one, everyone seemed to be pretty firmly against this kind of thing. -
165.234.252.11 (
talk) 20:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Strong support - tracking IDs for things is what Wikidata does best. Even entries that otherwise have no data usually have at least one ID.
ARR8 (
talk) 14:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose to anything linked with Wikidata. They have continually shown they are unable to handle vandalism and having such info outside of the purview of enwiki is not a good idea.
Nihlus 04:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Moved from
Wikipedia:Requested templates
Not done: please establish a
consensus for this alteration
before requesting template edits. Also, see this
ArbCom motion. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C) 04:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)