This template is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This template is part of WikiProject AIDS, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to
AIDS,
HIV, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.AIDSWikipedia:WikiProject AIDSTemplate:WikiProject AIDSAIDS articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Bugchasing?
Under culture, shouldn't there be a link to
bugchasing?
Agree. It certainly should be added as it is part of the AIDS culture.
68.116.99.78 (
talk) 21:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but that doesn't belong here. Look at the template. It's not an anti-gay crusade.
OrangeMarlinTalk•Contributions 22:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)reply
It's a potentially notable phenomenon, or at least has drawn some coverage in
reliable sources. But the bottom line is that the
bugchasing article is a mess - poorly sourced, loaded with OR, filled with external linkspam, etc. Why not spend the effort on cleaning up and improving the
bugchasing article and link it from here once it reaches a minimal level of quality? This template is already huge, so we should be at least a little selective about adding to it. MastCellTalk 22:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)reply
It's a cultural phenomena, and I would doubt the notability. I'm not sure it belongs in what can be described as academic treatments of AIDS. The template could add lots of random stuff if we're not careful.
OrangeMarlinTalk•Contributions 22:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)reply
I agree that the
bugchasing article is not in good shape. Perhaps when/if it is brought up to a better standard, a link to said article could be added to the template. We might want to establish a specific criteria for how and when that is achieved. Regardless, it has been established that bugchasing is indeed a cultural phenomenon and therefore I believe it fits.
68.116.99.78 (
talk) 22:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)reply
It needs to be added. The way to combat ignorance is with awareness.
74.41.193.214 (
talk) 22:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Bottom of this template - other templates
At the bottom of this template there are links to other templates. The presentation is not good because it is not obvious where the links will go. Also while the templates are related I do not feel that they should be in this template because they are supercategories in which HIV is a member, but which are not about HIV specifically. Is there any objection to my removing all of these?
Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC)reply
How are HIV memorial and notable HIV-focused art projects not HIV and AIDS related?
Prokaryotes removed these three links and I'm not really sure why as they seem completely HIV & AIDS related, particularly the first two which are awareness-raising projects.
Bringing up for discussion.
Mabalu (
talk) 09:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply
These are projects, not topics and i don't think it makes sense to add a handful of random selected projects to outline the topics of HIV/AIDS. There are more projects in the template though. Projects belong into a new article for listing of HIV/AIDS related projects, but are not within the scope of outlining the topic. The template could then get a link to the project listing. --
prokaryotes (
talk) 09:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2023
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.