This template is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
Start
I just started a template for topics related to the end of human civilization, humanity, the Earth, and the universe. It's still very much a rough draft right now, and isn't ready for any articles, but eventually it should be wroth something. Named
Template:Doomsday for now. --
Wasted Sapience 21:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm going to go ahead and add this to a couple of articles in order to get the word out. --
Wasted Sapience 21:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)reply
End of the world
End of the world and
Doomsday cover a lot of the same thing, but different terms. I might have called this template "End of the world" and linked to it as the top-level article.. but then I can see why Doomsday was chosen also. How we do we deal with Doomsday vs EOTW and are there any others like that? --
Stbalbach 00:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Astronomical links
If no-one minds, I will delete the astronomical links in the template. Doomsday, according to the article, is a possible ending to all human life, in an scientific or metaphysical way. The
ultimate end of the universe doesn't seem part of it, in my humble opinion. --
Soetermans (
talk) 13:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Move request
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I've fixed the request, assuming you want it to remain a template. --
BDD (
talk) 18:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Default oppose. No rationale offered for move, template has a stable name. Template name doesn't always have to match the "header."
SnowFire (
talk) 20:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose Template names are often a memorable shorthand to use in {{
inserttemplatename}} for editors, not meant to correspond exactly to the title displayed, which may may be formatted in a different way because of layout or other reasons.
walkvictor falktalk 18:08, 6 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.