I get it. But I would argue that "for whom articles exist" is not a good criterion. If an entity is important and an article does not exist then it should be created (at least a stub). By the same token just because an article exists does not mean it merits inclusion.
WRT Laredo, I would argue that this is not a great navbox either. For one it is way too long. {{Template:New York City}} is a pretty good one. {{Template:Chicago}} and {{Template:SF Bay Area}} are decent too.
In a small town with a limited number of businesses, especially those of any size, I think the inclusion point becomes moot. If the business article survives based on WP:RS and WP:NOTE, it can probably merit inclusion (based upon the limited number of total businesses).
WRT Laredo, I wasn't discussing the merits of the Laredo infobox, just simply stating the Galveston one was based upon it. --
nsaum75¡שיחת! 15:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC)reply
OK, whatever. Just suggestions. --
Mcorazao (
talk) 19:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)reply