Indigenous peoples of North America NA‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles NA This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Canada: Alberta Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

; Resources Alberta Source - resources about Alberta Heritage (places, people, etc), icluding some First Nations Canada Indian and Northern Affairs - Alberta Indian Reserves Statistics Canada - 2001 Census Aboriginal Population Profile Aboriginal Canada - Firts Nations in Alberta Alberta Municipal Affairs - 2005 Official Population list - Indian Registered Population. Alberta Government - Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development

I've recently created navboxes for First Nations in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, so I'm making a few edits in order to have all (Western) Canadian FN navboxes match each other.

The basic hierarchical organization should be pretty versatile: it primarily uses the tribal council structure, but has space for unaffiliated and unrecognized nations too. The ethnolinguistic/ethnocultural group section is more debatable. Here's the rules I'm holding myself to:

• I'm eliminating endonym/exonym distinctions because, although the motivations behind this bilingualism are certainly admirable, it puts a lot of exonyms on display which are no longer even current in the English language. I think a single name should be displayed for each nation, aggressively defaulting to the endonym unless there exists an exonym which is a) significantly more recognizable in everyday use and b) generally used in English-language materials by the specific nation in question. (For instance "Cree" passes this test.)

• Because the bulk of the navbox is dedicated to contemporary tribal governments and organizations, I'm thinning out nations which are no longer present in Alberta's territory, but still exist elsewhere. This removes some historical perspective, but I believe it magnifies the impact of the rest of the wikibox, which should be structured in a way which demonstrates that First Nations are relevant to the life of Alberta as we know it today.

Let me know if you have any thoughts about this, making these decisions right is important for the task of getting Canadian FN templates into shape.

Awmcphee ( talk) 04:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC) reply